“Is the staff at Dena’s unionized? If not, why not?”
9 Replies to “Hugo Boss Socialists”
Related fact: owning and operating an inn took the hard edge off George McGovern’s left-liberalism – at least, the econo-cratic side of it. He found out what it was like to be the regulatee after plumping for so many regulations when in politics.
Wants it McGovern the liberal dip-wad who said COME HOME AMERICA? or who else he was ovious a ultra liberal who was a big favorate of the liberal left-wing news media
Well that’s amusing!
A shopkeeper who advocates for labour and wishes to become elected as a representative of a non-socialist community!!
Seems to me the business end must be the wife… the husband is clearly a public titsucker of the first order….
Not only are these NDPers political poseurs, they present themselves as “carriage trade” and can’t even write a grammatically correct sentence.
The following quote from Dena’s website demonstrates, in only 22 words, FOUR errors: a sentence fragment, use of the wrong pronoun, misuse of the definite article, and a singular noun/plural pronoun disagreement. Here’s the grammatical hodge-podge:
“Primarily targeting the professional business woman between the ages of 30 to 50 which desires the confidence in the way they look.”
Here’s a free editing job:
1) There’s an incomplete sentence here: it’s not a sentence because there is no predicate for what appears to be the subject, “Primarily targeting the professional business woman between the ages of 30 to 50” . . . IS what? DOES what? MEANS what? etc.
(Isn’t this also discriminatory? How about the many women, business or not and UNDER 30 or OVER 50, who might like this type of clothing? I know, the word, “primarily”, lets Dena’s off the hook, but this still sounds somewhat exclusionary to me!)
Here’s the sentence before this fragment, as well as the start of the fragment: “Dena’s has been offering the highest quality women’s clothing from top designers and well-known manufacturers for over 16 years. Primarily targeting the professional . . . ”
A comma after “years” and a lower case “p” on “primarily” would solve the incomplete sentence problem very nicely.
(Don’t worry, I’ll give a complete grammatical make-over at the end!)
2) The word “woman” denotes a person, so the correct pronoun would be “who”, not “which”, a word that denotes an inanimate object.
3) The word “confidence” here is used in a general sense. Therefore, the use of the definite article “the” is unnecessary.
4) The noun “woman” is singular. The pronoun “they” is plural. Therefore, there is a singular noun/plural pronoun disagreement here.
TA-DAH! HERE’S THE FULL MONTY GRAMMATICAL MAKE-OVER:
“Dena’s has been offering the highest quality women’s clothing from top designers and well-known manufacturers for over 16 years, primarily targeting the professional business woman between the ages of 30 to 50, who desires confidence in the way she looks.”
OR IT MIGHT BE WRITTEN LIKE THIS:
“Dena’s has been offering the highest quality women’s clothing from top designers and well-known manufacturers for over 16 years, primarily targeting professional business women between the ages of 30 to 50, who desire confidence in the way they look.”
For continuity with the first sentence, I think I prefer version two, which sticks to the plural, e.g., “women’s clothing”.
There’s no conflict here.
Look for Dena’s to become an international chain if this guy gets in with a majority. Non-union of course! Also look for all the other clothing stores in the province to go belly up.
This is the NDP way.
they rent them do they, I was wondering why the same bunch of hairylegged birkenstock broads and deheveled men with squirels in their beards, is at every protest. They work on that look of outrage that only Jack Layton or Ed Broadbent can conjure up on every issue from autoplants to lactating mothers. to add a stupid dimension then CBCpravda will cover the story.
you don’t have to look very far to see more of this kind of NDP capitalism. a well connected NDP”er in Regina owns a bunch of D——–Q ice cream restaurants, (or did). non union, you bet. socialism at it’s coldest.
Related fact: owning and operating an inn took the hard edge off George McGovern’s left-liberalism – at least, the econo-cratic side of it. He found out what it was like to be the regulatee after plumping for so many regulations when in politics.
Wants it McGovern the liberal dip-wad who said COME HOME AMERICA? or who else he was ovious a ultra liberal who was a big favorate of the liberal left-wing news media
Well that’s amusing!
A shopkeeper who advocates for labour and wishes to become elected as a representative of a non-socialist community!!
Seems to me the business end must be the wife… the husband is clearly a public titsucker of the first order….
Not only are these NDPers political poseurs, they present themselves as “carriage trade” and can’t even write a grammatically correct sentence.
The following quote from Dena’s website demonstrates, in only 22 words, FOUR errors: a sentence fragment, use of the wrong pronoun, misuse of the definite article, and a singular noun/plural pronoun disagreement. Here’s the grammatical hodge-podge:
“Primarily targeting the professional business woman between the ages of 30 to 50 which desires the confidence in the way they look.”
Here’s a free editing job:
1) There’s an incomplete sentence here: it’s not a sentence because there is no predicate for what appears to be the subject, “Primarily targeting the professional business woman between the ages of 30 to 50” . . . IS what? DOES what? MEANS what? etc.
(Isn’t this also discriminatory? How about the many women, business or not and UNDER 30 or OVER 50, who might like this type of clothing? I know, the word, “primarily”, lets Dena’s off the hook, but this still sounds somewhat exclusionary to me!)
Here’s the sentence before this fragment, as well as the start of the fragment: “Dena’s has been offering the highest quality women’s clothing from top designers and well-known manufacturers for over 16 years. Primarily targeting the professional . . . ”
A comma after “years” and a lower case “p” on “primarily” would solve the incomplete sentence problem very nicely.
(Don’t worry, I’ll give a complete grammatical make-over at the end!)
2) The word “woman” denotes a person, so the correct pronoun would be “who”, not “which”, a word that denotes an inanimate object.
3) The word “confidence” here is used in a general sense. Therefore, the use of the definite article “the” is unnecessary.
4) The noun “woman” is singular. The pronoun “they” is plural. Therefore, there is a singular noun/plural pronoun disagreement here.
TA-DAH! HERE’S THE FULL MONTY GRAMMATICAL MAKE-OVER:
“Dena’s has been offering the highest quality women’s clothing from top designers and well-known manufacturers for over 16 years, primarily targeting the professional business woman between the ages of 30 to 50, who desires confidence in the way she looks.”
OR IT MIGHT BE WRITTEN LIKE THIS:
“Dena’s has been offering the highest quality women’s clothing from top designers and well-known manufacturers for over 16 years, primarily targeting professional business women between the ages of 30 to 50, who desire confidence in the way they look.”
For continuity with the first sentence, I think I prefer version two, which sticks to the plural, e.g., “women’s clothing”.
There’s no conflict here.
Look for Dena’s to become an international chain if this guy gets in with a majority. Non-union of course! Also look for all the other clothing stores in the province to go belly up.
This is the NDP way.
Here’s a bunch of striking workers hiring homeless people to picket for them. I wonder if they get double time for overtime and dental benefits?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/23/AR2007072302011_pf.html
Here’s a story on rent-a-hippys, you can hire them to do your protesting for you.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6292341.stm
they rent them do they, I was wondering why the same bunch of hairylegged birkenstock broads and deheveled men with squirels in their beards, is at every protest. They work on that look of outrage that only Jack Layton or Ed Broadbent can conjure up on every issue from autoplants to lactating mothers. to add a stupid dimension then CBCpravda will cover the story.
you don’t have to look very far to see more of this kind of NDP capitalism. a well connected NDP”er in Regina owns a bunch of D——–Q ice cream restaurants, (or did). non union, you bet. socialism at it’s coldest.
@spurwing plover:
Yes, that was McGovern.