Carol Jamieson: The Plot Thickens

Stephen Taylor has his eye on the oft-quoted “Trojan Tory” , who apparently, has never met a Tory party leader she couldn’t organize against. Now she’s issuing her own “news releases”.
It’s no surprise that the Harper hater is so popular with the Toronto Globe and Mail’s Gloria Galloway . Reportedly, Jamieson “coverage” will expand to the CTV news this evening, though I don’t know the nature of it.
Though, I can guess.
update here’s the online version.

64 Replies to “Carol Jamieson: The Plot Thickens”

  1. It is a politicians job to turn out the vote.

    If Mr. Harper wants to win he has to get ALL his ducks in a row for election day.

    Support and loyalty from his conservative base has to be earned.

    IMO, a strong leader will get that support and weak one will not.

    Personally, I think Mr. Harper has earned the right to another shot at being PM and I hope he succeeds but he has a very tough row to hoe.

    There are back stabbers and fair weather friends all around him.

    Makes one realize why it is that President Bush values loyalty so highly.

  2. Peter Loewen: You know how things go in the blogsphere, so many conspiracies, so little time and space.
    Sometimes, the facts just get confused.

  3. Hate to say it, but I’m with Peter. Where’s the Carol/Magna stuff? Hope CTV/Liberals didn’t send Bruno over to whack your knees, Kate. It would be something they’d do, just because they can. I think we should all take a deep breath. Conservative coffers are overflowing with people who donated to the party, and presumably they know who’s leading it. They’ve also increased membership, again, with the full knowledge of who the leader is. This is all a push by the Libs and their friends to create the appearance of chaos within the ranks. The battle is being won on the ground, on the doorstep and in the blogsphere. Tune out the MSM and life will be sweeter. Can you imagine how bad this story would be if Don Newman and the CBC were on it?

  4. Hey Enough, I got that letter too. I think it’s from the Liberals, frankly. They can’t shore up the same financial support the Tories have, so they’re using Paul Martin’s offshore companies to plead for money/investments for whatever cause they espouse today. Don’t send money or promise to marry this woman or her daughter, okay? They’re probably Liberal, and God knows, we don’t need any more of them in this country.

  5. Harper said he would not respond to the dissidents.
    “The Conservative leader who wins, the leader who brings Conservatives together and unites them, is a leader who, frankly, ignores such people.
    “It is a leader who does not spend his time attacking other Conservatives, it’s a leader who spends his time attacking the Liberals and that’s what I intend to do.”
    Harper said he will win the next election not through the media, but by reaching out to people locally.
    The stepped up attacks have added another piece to the puzzle of when that election will come.>>> more
    http://www.rapp.org/url/?DXD32MG7
    ctv

  6. Damn right this is an attack by Magna and there thieving Liberal friends but you will never see this in the biased media we have in this country today even National Post has this story running no facts checked just another sound bite attacking the only honest party leader in Ottawa.I mean come on people take a good look and what have you got Limousine Jack, Mr. Dithers, and a seperatist. Damn right the left is panicing.

  7. Pretty sure that Carol Jamieson is not Nancy Jamieson.
    About 10 years older than Nancy who was only 25 when she told Joe that he didn’t have the votes. Didn’t Nancy Jamieson try to get the nomination in one of the Ottawa ridings during the last election.
    I hope Carol Jamieson is more successful with this latest attemp than her rumoured involvement with the Enza Supermodle campaign.
    All here…
    http://capitalxtra.on.ca/queercapital/cx102/cx102_enza.htm
    Here’s Carol Jamieson’s webpage for her unsuccessful run for Toronto council
    http://www.caroljamieson.com

  8. Vitor reconsidered the Magna post after talking privately to one of the people named. I also talked to him, and after explaining his involvement (or lack thereof) in more detail, I agreed to revisit it.
    I invited him to write a brief response, which I offered to post as an update/retraction, but he said he would prefer to have it pulled in its entirety.
    Which was fine by me. There was nothing that wasn’t factual in the original post – Vitor decided that he’d accept the explanation that the ties were coincidental so he removed it. As my post hadn’t been up that long, I chose to delete it, as I hadn’t added anything by way of my own commentary.
    In the time I’ve been posting here, that’s only the second such deletion of a post – I forget the other. Don’t read anything more into it than I just explained.

Navigation