Because We Admire Their Basic Dictatorship

Bio-warfare experts question why Canada was sending lethal viruses to China

Last month, an acclaimed NML scientist — Xiangguo Qiu — was reportedly escorted out of the lab along with her husband, another biologist, and members of her research team. The agency said it was investigating an “administrative issue,” and had referred a possible policy breach to the RCMP. Little more has been said about the affair.

Reassuring.

23 Replies to “Because We Admire Their Basic Dictatorship”

  1. Is this what Justin means by Canada is back? “Actually Made Canada Great Again”(by selling germ warfare to China)

    1. Why was Canada sending lethal viruses to China? Anyone who does not know the answer are as stupid as those who did it, they are all stupid.

  2. Eventually one of these “flu” seasons is going to be a real bummer, but then we can just up our immigration levels to a million per annum. I’m sure the Chicoms would be more than willing to help us expedite the process.
    Everyone sing together, “A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian…”

    1. President Trump will be happy to, on the day he addresses liberated Canada over the network formerly known as the CBC.

  3. The failure of Canada’s Nuclear research had/have the same fuzzy thinking wonks….Advanced Knowledge is not cheap when shared with those that may have obvious EVIL intent……..Looking in the mirror maybe scary…..Brain dead PhD’s live in low level cloud clusters.

  4. Beijing is working on genetically engineering an airborne plague that will cause a hairy butter-stinking white devil to die in agony in three days but to which a pure-blooded Han Chinaman will be immune—reducing the barbarian population to a level easily marched off to the killing fields, but leaving cities and farmland intact and in perfect condition for re-settling the surplus population of China’s horribly overcrowded cities.

    Now ask a difficult question—such as how the Chinese expect to make any technological progress after murdering us all, because they haven’t had a genuinely new idea in millennia.

  5. Conrad Black on Trump and China:

    “China is a poor country with few resources while the United States, with a year to retool and reorient itself, would not have to import any necessities except perhaps small quantities of rare earths. China still has 300 million people who live pretty much as they did 2,000 years ago, a 40 percent command economy, no institutions that command any respect except the People’s Army; and not a word or figure it publishes about its economy can be unreservedly believed. It is trying an end run around the entire world economic system at the same time that it asserts itself with conjoined military and economic expansionism in susceptible areas. Of course this president will save China’s “face” if that’s what it comes to, but in contrast to all the havering ninnies in The Economist and like-minded places, the strongest cheering section President Trump enjoys in the execution of his China policies consists of China’s neighbors: Vietnam, India, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Australia. They are a ready group of important states to resurrect a refined containment policy slightly modeled on the North Atlantic alliance but with more emphasis on economic issues.”

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/08/trump-faces-down-china-threat/

    1. Oh no, let me guess, who could it possibly be?

      Hmmmm, thinking, thinking more………………….

  6. We got SARS from China… only seems fair we send them Ebola back..

    huh ? We didn’t just dose up a Libtard and fly them to Peking ?

    soft Western governments….

  7. Why would China want the Ebola virus from Canada when they can get the fresh stuff direct from Africa?

  8. sending pathogens?
    pffft. we’ve sent them bloody everything else, jobs, mfg’ing, 100s Billions in cash, their elites educated in our
    colleges and universities (guess what they major in).
    are we sending back the beetle infested pallets that gave us millions of decimated hectares of forest?
    and he STILL “admires” their “basic dictatorship”.

  9. From the article:

    “That could mean an offensive agent, or a modified germ let loose by proxies, for which only China has the treatment or vaccine, said Giordano, co-head of Georgetown’s Brain Science and Global Law and Policy Program.

    “This is not warfare, per se,” he said. “But what it’s doing is leveraging the capability to act as global saviour, which then creates various levels of macro and micro economic and bio-power dependencies.”

    China doesn’t necessarily have to release a bio-weapon. It can wait for someone else to do it and then rake in the big bucks selling vaccines.

    It’s cornering another market and all the West is doing to attending pervert parades.

    1. Interesting angle.

      I’m betting the Chinese are more interested in DNA specific biological weapons above all others.

      Maybe with enough kick-backs Trudeau can get taxpayer money working on it for them.

Navigation