97 Replies to “Pandemic of the Vaccinated”

  1. There’s some problems with these stats.

    The people who die from COVID are almost entirely old, where the vaccination rates are much higher. Thus the donut on the left has little to do with the donut on right. They are two different populations which should not be compared.

    Let’s see the stats solely for those over 70, which make up around 90% of the deaths and where the full vaccination rates are around 95%.

    1. Except that’s not the issue. We always knew that the old were susceptible. And it depends on where they draw the line at saying they are “fully vaccinated” or “boosted”. By shifting the time from injection until they are “protected”, the numbers shift. For instance they could convert any death or case that occurs in days 1-21 after the booster into COVID in the unvaccinated. This converts adverse vaccine reactions into COVID in the unvaccinated.

      And if you look at the data out of the UK vaccine surveillance reports (the last one where they provided the breakdown by age group and vax status, Week 13), you find that the vaccinated in the plus 70 age group has over 91% of the Covid deaths….the entirely unvaxxed in the same group is 8.19%

      The “vaccines” are abject failures.

      1. Yes, we know the old are susceptible, which means the person who made this display was likely being intentionally deceptive, knowing that many people are poor are detecting even fairly obvious statistical sleight of hands.

        1. That’s an admission that the CDC’s been LYING to us for two years about “why” people are dying. As you correctly assert … old people have been dying of OLD AGE!!! Instead of a respiratory illness named “pneumonia” or “the seasonal flu” … old people’s deaths have been named “COVID” deaths.

          We have been LIED TO … from the beginning.

          And BTW … didn’t the official Fauxci CDC narrative say that being vaccinated didn’t PREVENT COVID … but improved the outcomes? How’s THAT LIE workin out for them?

        2. Yeah, the BC gov’t is now pushing “anti-vax” propaganda.
          Your mind has officially entered into pretzel configuration.

          1. Except it isn’t “anti-vax propaganda”. It is data….and they can no longer hide the facts. Just like the UK. This pattern has been obvious for many months…..certainly by the beginning of January, 2022. It has only gotten worse since.

          2. You are correct. This chart was put out by the B.C. government.

            Not too bright of them to do so. They should have broken it down by age group. That would have told a very different story.

          3. Art:

            I didn’t say the data was wrong. I said that data does not support the conclusion that vaccines don’t work. You have to break the data down by age group, or you can easily reach a spurious conclusion.

          4. It’s on purpose that the data is cloudy and vague, not differentiated by age.
            Bonnie and Dix WANT THE PUBLIC LIVING IN FEAR.
            Witness all the masked idiots wherever I go. After a long weekend in the interior, where very few Maskots exist, a visit to Costco Victoria yesterday, proves that this region is full of delusional hypochondriacs.Oh well, they will all soon succumb to ADE inflicted serious health problems, and death.
            The die is cast.

      2. Here is a proper statistical analysis about the effectiveness of vaccines on the death rate.

        https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/421-010-CasesInNotFullyVaccinated.pdf

        When they compared 65+ year old unvaccinated people to 65+ who have completed the vaccination primary series, (which I think is two vaccinations) they found:

        1. COVID case rate is 2.7 times higher.
        2. COVID hospitalization rate is 3.4 times higher.
        3. COVID death rate is 4.6 times higher.

        This is in line with many other studies. Vaccination saves lives.

        1. Boy, have you been sucked in. Did you happen to look at the time frame for the data? Because that tells the tale. For example, they tend to (sometimes they show it, sometimes they hide it), go back to February, 2021. But that’s not relevant….because at that time very few people were “fully vaccinated”. And the deaths occurred by Delta. The true measure now is from January 1, 2022 (peak of Omicron).

          Some vaccines save lives. These don’t.

          1. If you look at page 6 of the report, you’ll see that almost all of the cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were after June 2021.

          2. Pretty weak defence KM.

            Triple jabbed elderly are dying in larger and larger numbers, as time goes on.

            And you call that “vaccinations work”? You need psychiatric help, or a rubber room.

          3. DanBC:

            Please present the evidence for your claim. Preferably something credible.

        2. When KM is presented with official data, published by the government, that undermines his narrative, he simply plugs his ears and starts singing “La La La!! I can’t hear you!”
          Suggesting that the BC gov’t is being “intentionally deceptive”, essentially publishing what KM thinks is “anti-vaxxer” propaganda is truly evidence of his coming completely unhinged.

          1. No, I don’t question the data. I question putting together a display which compares two things which can not be compared.

          2. When presented with evidence of his unhinged reasoning, he then changes the subject, and proceeds to contradict his previous posts, which went as follows:
            “the person who made this display was likely being intentionally deceptive”.
            Notice that he never fails to insert a weasel-word, for good measure.

        3. You draw an incomplete conclusion.

          If the overall numbers in the graphics are correct, and so are yours for the elderly, the correct complete conclusion has to be…

          Vaccination saves lives for people over 65+ (the highest risk group from Covid), but for younger people who were forced to get vaccinated despite extremely little risk from Covid, not only did the vaccination not save lives it is needlessly costing lives from Covid and vaccine side effects.

        4. I think that is a stretch. Since most people under 60 do not die from Covid without co-morbidities, you can hardly claim the vax is saving them. The absolute effectiveness of the vax is 1%. On top of every thing else, a shocking number of young people are dying from the vax. The whole vaccine agenda is based on deception.

        5. That study uses from feb 2021 to now. It’s therefore irrelevant garbage.

          1. james:

            As I’ve already pointed out…

            If you look at page 6 of the report, you’ll see that almost all of the cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were after June 2021.

        6. Phil:

          I don’t draw any conclusion from the graphic about whether the vaccinated are of greater (or lesser) risk of dying from COVID. In and of itself, there’s not enough information.

    2. Not to mention the selfish bastards filling up the funeral homes: A cynic would reply to the lead ‘Quit clogging up our hospital system’. Thank god I’m not a cynic.

    3. COVID-19 health outcomes by vaccination status and age, BC, 03 Apr. – 30 Apr. 2022
      AGE 70+
      TRIPLE VAXXED DEATHS 142
      UNVAXXED DEATHS 11

      Check the link provided and go to Vax Donut Charts “TAB”

      Hope this helps!!

      1. Yes indeed, those Quackxines look like they are working as intended.

        DePop.

    4. KM, what you point out is valid as far as it goes, but more stratification is needed to really say anything EXCEPT: The fact that any benefit has to be teased out to be determined, coupled with the data in the VAERS and the European equivalent, mean there is no way these should have been approved, and it appears there may be pharma data shenanigans, in which case they should have their liability protection revoked. In the released Phizer data, they had 1,223 vax deaths I believe. Usually 2 deaths will kill a drug is what I saw quoted from a source I believe to be reliable.
      Additionally, informed consent was not obtained, since the data required was hidden. This is a violation of the Nuremburg code to which both Canada and the US adhere, and should result in criminal prosecution of everybody knowingly involved, including the ultimate penalty for those found guilty of murder.

        1. Our point: Better off unvaxxed if ya don’t wanna die sooner rather than later.
          Your point: Not if COVID is the only cause of death that you care about.

          So yeah, we’re both right.

          1. No, my point is that the above graphic does not prove a damn thing concerning vaccines making death by COVID more likely.

            Seriously, you don’t even understand the point I’m making.

          2. They only prove death is more likely if vaxxed, and sooner rather than later.
            You see, most folk don’t care how they die, so long as its later and less painful.
            You only care if its COVID deaths, just like the gun control people who only care about gun deaths as a pretext for gun control, but ignore the totality of homicide statistics.
            So, how many jabs will you get? The 4th seems to be available in some places, so have you gotten it yet? If so, will you get a 5th, 6th or 7th? If so, why? If not, why not?

        2. Well no we don’t. If you want to play the age game, then you also have to consider PRE vaccine deaths in the plus 70 age group. Because as you say old people die. Yet for the vaccine, we give the data the benefit of the doubt, but pre-vaccine, we did NOT give the data the benefit of the doubt and merely claimed that Covid deaths in the plus 70 age group were legitimate. So if we are going to sniff around age groupings, then let’s really get down to it. Furthermore, is there any data available which shows how many in that age group died within say 28 days of getting their “life saving vaccine”? And how many of those deaths were actually CAUSED by the “vaccine” itself? I know of two in our family….both my in-laws. Mother in law had a stroke a week after her second shot and father in law died 3 weeks after his.

    5. This is true, and could be extended to all groups, as healthy folk would be less likely to jab, double Jab or triple jabbed. However, given the low number of unvaxxed in the province the conclusion that vaccinations are not saving folks is likely sound. Getting vaccinated won’t prevent you being infected and your vaccinated old relatives will not be protected from illness or death from the disease you give them. Vaccination therefore seems to have little benefit, and may even increase the problem.

  2. So the unvaccinated have half the death rate of the vaccinated? Interesting. Why isn’t the government telling us?

    1. I can’t believe how stupid governments are…..instead of protecting Pfizer, Moderna, etc., they should be screaming these numbers from the roof top. Governments do NOT want to be see colluding with the fraud that Pfizer and Moderna have perpetuated.

      Governments should be investigating this stuff relentlessly and calling public “health” officials (i.e. government bureaucrats) on the carpet for answers.

      1. And yeah, people like Theresa Tam and Bonnie Henry still are behind vaccine mandates. Time for the media to start telling people the truth and asking questions. We need an enquiry.

        1. Linda,
          The Media??
          Every newscast is sponsored by Pfizer.
          They “media” have been bought, either by pharma or the government.
          This is going to take a Freedom rally to the tune of millions to force Premiers and bureaucrats to resign and then be charged.
          I think the Freedom Convoy was a tune up. We now know how they acted.
          Trudeau ran off and hid like a spurned prom queen and then sent his goon squad in.
          Totally unjustifiable.
          I believe they are terrified of the consequences of what they have done and justice is coming. That’s why there is this push about disinformation, they are losing control of the narrative.

  3. 7% deaths among the unvaccinated.
    76% deaths among the “fully vaccinated”

    Implies that the “vaccinated” have a 76% / 7% = 10.85 x greater probability of death.

    In short, “fully vaccinated” are approximately 11 x more likely to die than unvaccinated.

    For those of us in the mathematics/physics world the probability of death, among the “fully vaccinated” is increased by an ORDER OF MAGNITUDE! 🙂

    This is represents a failure of epic proportions, by EVERY METRIC…enjoy your health while it lasts!

    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group “True North”

    1. As I mentioned above, this is not the correct conclusion.

      The donut on the left is for the entire population. The donut on the right is mostly for the old, as that makes up most COVID mortalities,. They have very different vaccination rates than the population as a whole.

      Thus the two donuts are comparing two different populations. They should have broken the chart down by age group.

      1. Completely false allegation, as one is comparing the population who are precisely at greatest risk for death…ie those who are in the 70+ age category. It is the 70+ age category that are among the highest “vaccination rates” (double vaxxed and boosted) thus the mathematics is correct as one is comparing apples to apples.

        Where exactly did you get your mathematics degree? I earned mine at a university that doesn’t subscribe to “woke mathematics”…

        Cheers

        Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

        1st Saint Nicolaas Army
        Army Group “True North”

        1. The donut on the left is for the population as a whole — all 5.3 million of them. It says right there.

          The donut on the right is about 90% made up of those over 70 years of age, cause that’s where most mortalities come from. Their vaccination rates are much higher.

          I got my masters in mathematics from the University of Waterloo, thanks very much.

          1. Brilliant, but the entire time (approximately 3 years) the Public Health Officers across the land have been telling the public the greatest risk was to the elderly… ie the 70+ age category. So if the vaccine was so “safe and efficacious” one would expect that the numbers should have been reversed in the above calculation. That conclusion is not borne out by the data in the age 70+ group… Rather the data suggests as I stated before the mRNA experiment was an epic failure.

            Notably, my wife as a dental hygienist practiced her profession throughout the Covid-19 debacle, and she deals with aerosols all day long. She should have been dead a hundred times over given the hysteria the public has been subjected to by the PHOs. Unvaxxed, she caught Covid-19 and survived and now has robust natural immunity. She did however get properly inoculated for hepatitis A & B; as that is a greater proximate risk factor in her profession than Covid-19. Notably, not everyone in the entire population is MANDATED to take the hepatitis A & B vaccine.

            Vaccines are usually stratified or recommended to “at risk groups”. The PHOs simply caved to the corrupt politics of the CDC… see the links to Dr Robert Malone, and Dr. Peter McCullough.

            I’ll stand by my comparison as it relates to the correct at risk age group.

            Cheers

            Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

            1st Saint Nicolaas Army
            Army Group “True North”

          2. Hans:

            I am not following your argument.

            My claim is simply that the donut on the left should not be compared to the donut on the right. They are apples and oranges.

            As I said elsewhere here, if 97% of old people are vaccinated (which is about correct), but 93% of deaths among old people are vaccinated, the vaccines have reduced your chances of dying.

          3. “I got my masters in mathematics from the University of Waterloo, thanks very much.”

            I’d ask for my money back…

          4. Dumb Biker:

            And what part of my argument, precisely, do you disagree with? Point out the flaw.

      2. Well then let’s look at the last donut alone.

        Since that is mostly old (including the unvaxxed portion) it would seem that it’s safer for an old person not to have the vaccine.

        BTW, I’m old with a co-morbidity – diabetes. I caught the alpha strain and fully recovered.

        1. Dirtman:

          You have made what is called a “base rate error”. You have not taken into consideration the number of old people who are vaccinated versus the number of old people who are not.

          If 97% of old people are vaccinated (which is about correct), but 93% of deaths among old people are vaccinated, the vaccines have reduced your chances of dying.

          1. That’s ignoring diet, lifestyle, sex, location, co-morbidities, body weight, psychological factors and so on, so that data is flawed, right? Just like this data is flawed for not including age brackets?
            We were all told that going to Costco or Walmart was OK, but going to the mom and pop furniture store or church or burger joint or pub was verboten, heck, they even sent armed goons to shut down said smaller operations, so, obviously, those mentioned factors must be so significant that an armed response was warranted, right?
            Again, you’re reasoning is entirely unhinged, unless you actually like the sort of armed response and coerced behavior that we’ve seen over the last two years, in which case your moral compass is irrevocably broken.

          2. HiHo:

            One question: Do you believe that the display at the top of this article is compelling evidence that vaccines increase mortality rates due to COVID?

          4. So you agree with me that the above display is not evidence that vaccines increase mortality due to COVID.

            Well then, I think I’ll go work out.

          5. Killer, the vaccines have NOT reduced a person’s chance of dying if they are under 60. They may have some marginal benefit for the elderly, but not significant. Plus, you completely ignore heart issues, blood clots and cancers increasing in parallel with the vaccines — likely due to a weakened immune system. It is really hard to make a solid case for these vaccines and the outrageous public expense incurred be a use of the vaccine ” rollouts” to all those people sho never needed the vaccine.

          6. LindaL:

            I would be my great joy to debate these issues at some time, but my *ONLY* point today is that the display at the top of this article is not evidence that COVID vaccines increase your chances of dying from COVID.

          8. Except 97% of old people are not vaccinated. It’s actually 85% that are “fully vaccinated and boosted”….and the funny thing is, if you look at the UK vaccine surveillance data, it is the BOOSTER that has the highest percentage of deaths in that age group.

            The vaccines have failed.

          9. That depends on your definition of old. If you mean 80 and above, yes. If you mean all seniors 65 & above, not.

      3. You should not take any satisfaction in your Quackxine favouritism KM.

        The data clearly shows that Quackxines have little effect on deaths, ICU visits, hospitalizations or cases. Differences in rates per 100k population are statistical noise.

        The Quackxines are of little benefit, in fact, over time, the result is one’s immune system becomes a Covid enabler for the jabbed. The jabbed are more susceptible to Covid as a result, than unjabbed.

        Some success.

          1. If you look at the Covid deaths from January 1, 2022 (Omicron) of all the provinces in Canada and then compare the deaths per million to the percent of people “fully vaccinated” and “fully vaccinated and boosted” for each province, you will find there is virtually ZERO correlation. In other words, the vaccines have zero effect on death rate per million.

        2. Art: The Ontario report is in line with the observations of a radiologist in a major Toronto hospital. Unvaccinated patients are grossly over represented among COVID patients in the ICU. If you’re a wondering, he’s a strong conservative and rejects the idea of vaccine mandates.

          https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-069317?utm_source=STAT+Newsletters&utm_campaign=c159fd3b41-MR_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8cab1d7961-c159fd3b41-116322369

          Also…

          https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-069317?utm_source=STAT+Newsletters&utm_campaign=c159fd3b41-MR_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8cab1d7961-c159fd3b41-116322369

          To quote: “Higher vaccination coverage was associated with lower rates of population level covid-19 mortality and incidence in the US.”

  4. The jabbed are a danger to the unjabbed, they want us segregated, for starters.
    They also fell for the Orwellian re-definition of “vaccine”, which now includes experimental mRNA technology, but which, prior to COVID, only meant weakened or inactive virri.
    Like KM above, they are like Jen Psaki, they will say anything to further their narrative, and when evidence comes out which contradicts it, they “circle back” and tell some more lies.

  5. I’m guessing the majority of the vaccinated people dying belong to the same group that have been dying throughout the fake pandemic. The elderly.

  6. There’s only one way to interpret this data for BC for the month of April. If you’re over 70 and triple injected and get the coof, you’re as good as dead. And if you’re not injected, you account for 7% of deaths the health authorities ascribe to the coof.

    1. I don’t think so. Even with a triple vaxx or quadruple vaxx your chances are low. It’s just higher if you’re boosted for sure. NO REFUNDS boomers.

      1. Boomers.
        Average age of deaths – 82.
        IFR worldwide 1.2%
        “It’s just higher if you’re boosted” You figured it out.

  7. 1.6% chance of catching the disease.
    If you catch it, 17% chance of being hospitalized.
    If you’re hospitalized, 14% chance of going critical or dying or both.

    204 deaths out of 5.3 million people = 1 chance in 26 000,or .004% chance of dying, vaxxed or unvaxxed.
    Out of that .004%, 7% were unvaxxed, making for a .00028% chance of dying, or 1 in 357 142. If vaxxed, still at around .004% chance of dying, ie an order of magnitude.
    The vax is at best useless, and as time goes on, and more adverse effects of what is essentially experimental mRNA tech come out, it’ll most likely be shown to have negative efficacity on the longer term.
    COVID is over, now it’s time for the vax deaths to kick in, and this is exactly what we’re seeing.

    1. Obesity and diabetes have been known from the start to be significant co-morbidities. It’s only natural that the vaccines would be less effective on those with those conditions.

  10. I have no competence in statistics but it is glaringly obvious that those in the single-dosed category appear to be weathering the covid storm significantly less disastrously than those in all the others. Can anyone throw any light on why this is so?

  11. Look bigots the vaccines make the death less painful ok. You don’t want to die in pain do you? Better get booooooosted.

    1. False. We are ALL leaving this world, one way or the other.

      If the doctors give you morphine, that would actually dull one’s pain; not to mention consciousness.

      The narrative of “easing your suffering” as a political tool to garner one’s cooperation in getting the jab; will not ease your pain. Vaccines have never been marketed as “pain relievers” until most recently. I would regard that nostrum as FALSE ADVERTISING.

      When PHOs sugar coat death, they are merely in “marketing mode”.

      Death pretty much sucks all the way around; regardless of the particular way you exit this life.

      Cheers

      Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

      1st Saint Nicolaas Army
      Army Group “True North”

      1. “Vaccines have never been marketed as “pain relievers” until most recently. ”
        A rather profound statement that I had not considered, until now.
        Thanks, Hans.

  12. In retrospect, it is astonishing how many people hopped on the ” vaccine” bandwagon when everyone knew they had not been properly tested. Canadians are terribly gullible.

  13. “You must get on the boxcar, at risk of a, b or c human agency.”
    “You must get the jab, at risk of a, b or c human agency.”
    The difference is one of degree, not kind.

  14. Not hard to pick out the guys who are triple-jabbed and scared, eh? 🙂

    1. Jamie.

      After some 70 replies, lol, ya hit the nail on the head.

      Neither myself or my wife are vaxxed….& at no point in the past 28 months have we ever seen a DEMONSTRABLE NEED…?? Precisely the same reason neither of us has taken a seasonal flu shot.

      Our “limited” scientific knowledge tells us to take our vitamins, eat properly, and stay active….and rely on our European genetics, and our Immune systems.

      Covid was/is 100% (Imo), a Psy-Op of global proportions designed to kill Western humans…via Biological Weapons: aka mRNA jabs.

      Period end of Story.
      Many out there who profited and proliferated this Nazi like campaign are deserving of a Nuremberg Neckless….many.

  15. Geert Vanden Bossche predicts the next variant will still be highly infectious but will be much more virulent due to immune pressure causing immune escape and this will primarily harm the vaxxed and moreso the more shots they have had. Ironically, the same vax-created non-neutralising anti-body that makes omicron more infectious also makes omicron less virulent (milder symptoms) https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/videos-and-interviews/international-vaccine-expert-geert-vanden-bossche-speaks-up-again

    His take is that the only hope for all the highly vaxxed countries now is massive prophylactic administration of something like ivermectin. He believes public health authorities will be forced to promote ivermectin. Too naive I think. It will all
    be blamed on Putin, or maybe climate change. Anything but admitting they goofed.

    It ain’t over till its over.

    1. Governments will do the opposite instead.

      MOAR QUACKXINES!

      Just the other day, my F-I-L ran into another geezer at the mailbox. The geezer said, he just got back from getting his 4th jab of mRNA damage, and had to beg for it. The staff didn’t want to give it to him, but he persisted and demanded it.

      Can’t fix stupid!

      1. I think you may have come upon a new law of nature:
        “It is impossible to subjugate entire populations without quackery.”

    2. I’m sorry. Ivermectin is horse paste. As such, its use in the treatment of der coof ist verboten, schweinhund. That is all.

          1. Those weren’t trials.

            The actual research showed it to be effective against COVID and not only that, they found that it is effective in multiple ways so the chance of a mutation being able to be unaffected by it is almost zero.

  16. Willis Eschenbach from 2yrs ago

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/03/24/the-italian-connection/

    With regards to

    Updated: April 2022
    Published: March 2020
    Share on: TG / TW / FB
    Powered by

    Fully referenced facts about covid, provided by experts in the field, to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment. (Regular updates below).

    “The only means to fight the plague is honesty.” (Albert Camus, 1947)
    Overview

    Lethality: The overall infection fatality rate (IFR) of the novel coronavirus in the general population (excluding nursing homes) is about 0.1% to 0.5% in most countries, which is most closely comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1936, 1957 and 1968.
    Age profile: The median age of covid deaths is over 80 years in most Western countries (78 in the United States) and about 5% of the deceased had no medical preconditions. In many Western countries, about 50% of all covid deaths occurred in nursing homes.
    Vaccine protection: Covid vaccines provide a very high, but rapidly declining protection against severe disease. Vaccination cannot prevent infection and transmission. A prior infection generally confers superior immunity compared to vaccination (in part due to mucosal immunity).

    […]

    https://swprs.org/facts-about-covid-19/

  17. This is true, and could be extended to all groups, as healthy folk would be less likely to jab, double Jab or triple jabbed. However, given the low number of unvaxxed in the province the conclusion that vaccinations are not saving folks is likely sound. Getting vaccinated won’t prevent you being infected and your vaccinated old relatives will not be protected from illness or death from the disease you give them. Vaccination therefore seems to have little benefit, and may even increase the problem.

    1. You know this. I know this. Everybody with eyes and ears knows this. I’m sure THEY know this.
      That makes the question “What are THEIR motives for the levels of coercion we’ve been subjected to?”

  18. Imagine being dumb enough, scientifically illiterate enough, to think these data indicate what the OP is stating. How much brain damage does this take? Why do you hate critical thinking?

    1. I would assume around your level of brain damage there UnMe, since the data is pretty conclusive if you go down to the individual bar graphs for each age bracket and vaccination level. It shows the if you are triple jabbed in the 70+ age bracket the death rate in April in BC was 13 times greater that if you where unjabbed. 142 triple jabbed 70+ died versus 11 unjabbed 70+, you can do math, right? Even the Donut graph shows only 7% all cause deaths among the unvaxxed versus 93% among the jabbed. The 70+ triple jabbed are fooked.

  19. How many are dead and how many took the shots. Raw numbers only, everything else is propaganda.

  20. What’s the shift in the above numbers if vaxed is counted from the time of getting jabbed? (as compared to 3 to 4 weeks after, as is the current practice).

  21. A few questions:
    How many people that took horse paste ended up hospitalized with covid?
    The hospitalized people that died or ended up in ICU – what was their vitamin D blood level upon entering the hospital?
    What are the all cause mortality rates for each group, including the group that’s jabbed, but not yet considered vaxed?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation