45 Replies to “We’re not Argentina”

  1. I don’t know how much the MRNA vaccines cost per shot, but I’ll wager it’s a helluva lot more than ivermectin pills which averaged less than US$5 per pill. I can’t help but think there’s a moral there. No morality. Just a moral.

    1. I believe I read it’s $29 a shot going up to $150 as shot next year.
      That’s why Trudeau wants to lock Canada into a 4 year contract with the drug companies at a fixed price.
      See, I saved Canada a shit load of money locking us into contracts with these Snake oil salesmen.

    2. The full course of treatment, 7 days, costs less than $5. It’s as cheap to make as aspirin. They sell it in gallon jugs at the farm store. Or they did, but now the farm store keeps it under lock and key because its BANNED in Canada.

      Just sit there for a second and think about that.

  2. The man needs to be rounded up. Obviously a fear monger spreading hope…er,…um…well besides the point. Not. A. Team. Player. That’s sufficient enough.

  3. Just think of all the people who have died because of an irrational hatred of Donald Trump.

    1. Trump mentioned Hydroxychloroquin, which also works quite well indeed. Ivermectin, Trump never mentioned that one.

      So this is something else than the irrational hatred of the Donald who is not even in office anymore. For my money that makes it even more sinister and worse than dirty politics.

  4. To think I served this country….where not 1 of the trough feeding slack jawed asshole Politicians had the BALLS to come out and say the same….not 1 Senator, not 1MP, not 1 MLA (ok maybe Hillier in Ont), & certainly not one Mayor.

    But that wasn’t the game was it..hmm?? It was all about NAZI STYLE Lies and propaganda to herd the populace to accept garbage jabs as their salvation so that you all could reap the FINANCIAL GAiNS to be had as we die off..be it in a week, month or 2 yrs from now.

    Every one of YOU EVIL NAZI Bastards deserves a hemp rope….every one of YOU.


    1. THE Hydroquinine Trump took kills Part of Some ewes other aids VIRUS AS WELL.
      CAN YOU SEE NOW WHY THEY WERE SCREAMING THAT THIS WAS A DANGEROUS DRUG AND NOT TO DARE USE IT. Behind The Scene Studies Are Now Coming Forth That Show Its Effectiveness, & Chemistry cheaper. other Diseases As Well And works even On Cancers.

    1. Jeff, They were snorting an iota-carrageenan nasal spray. The ivermectin was by oral drops. Considering this was a 10 week study, the 2 weeks of ivermectin held out very well.
      In research of this nature you start with a high enough dose to prove effectiveness and then try to figure out optimal dosage. Around here people are mostly on once monthly regimen. I haven’t heard of anyone taking ivermectin getting covid.

    2. Believe the real point is that people should have a choice. Also, while you may be correct about the how the Ivermectin was administered in this study, believe the current practice is pills.

    3. We in cow country take 1.5CC’s in our OJ once a week. If you get the Rona, it’s 1.5 cc’s a day for 3 days or until you’re cured

    4. Come back Jeff when you learn how to read a scientific paper.
      You are annoying the adults in the room.

        1. Yeah you linked to it but clearly you don’t understand what it said.

          The national-scale experiments being performed by India, Mexico, Argentina etc. indicate that Ivermectin works a lot better than the “vaccine” aka experimental MRNA gene modification treatment.

          One study is easy to ignore. Entire -nations- of evidence is harder.

          And by the way, you’ve been paying attention to the results of having more than half the population “vaccinated” in Israel? More people with two doses are catching WuFlu than people who took Ivermectin once a week.

          But then it isn’t really a big deal because very few people under the age of 85 died of WuFlu during this whole pandemic.

          So, just to recap because you don’t read well: The “vaccine” which is not a vaccine has not-really-great efficacy and it’s expensive. Ivermectin has amazingly good efficacy given what it is, and it is super cheap. The WuFlu probably won’t kill or maim you if you’re under 85 and don’t already have one foot in the grave and they other on a vaudville cliche. Whole countries are having excellent results beating WuFlu with Ivermectin, kind of crap results with the “vaccine”.

          And Ivermectin is banned for use on WuFlu in Canada. Okay? Get all that? That’s where we are.

          Connecting a few dots, this makes me think that A) our politicians were bought, because they can’t be that stupid. That’s “can’t wipe your own backside in the bathroom” level stupid. Also B) somebody somewhere really, really, really wants MRNA techniques to become mainstream right away. And that somebody has enough money to buy the Liberal Party of Canada.

          I encourage you to stop being a sheep and start thinking for yourself. Please prove me wrong if you can, because that’s a really ugly picture I just painted and I’d very much like to be wrong.

    5. A five day cycle for the HCQ cocktail and a similar routine for ivermectin . Taken when flu symptoms develop. The not-vaccines can kill you and cannot prevent infection or transmission. 99.8% recovery rate, it is a flu. If you have serious underlying medical conditions your health is at risk from the common cold.

      1. Hahahahaha … that ONLY applies if you’re a young black woman getting an abortion.

        It just occurred to me that The Government is ONLY interested in medical procedures that kills people … The Government doesn’t much care about LIFE

    6. “788 self-administered ivermectin oral drops and an iota-carrageenan nasal spray five times per day over a 14 day period.”
      So you are really Umee?
      Reading in shit that is not there?
      Where did this;
      “Is the idea that we would just do this forever to avoid Covid?” come from?

      You go ahead,get the “Vac” , in fact ask for double cause the dose lined up for me is just going to be wasted,So you preach it baby,
      Get your Government Goo,its double plus good, for you.
      Hell,its so good,for you,you can have mine too..

      Your blind trust in Government Goodness is charming..
      After 15 months of outright self contradiction,lying and incompetence,you still trust…
      No need to verify,just have faith….Keep that faith..
      Amazing how fear of a flu can make a complete serf out of you..

  5. Six of the Democrats legislators that jetted off to DC have now tested covid positive. Can Abbott require that they take ivermectin so they can return to work safely? The jabs they’re pushing on everyone sure aren’t working.

    1. A test is not a case. The WHO has said that running the pcr test at over 35 cycles will produce 100% false positives. Unless someone is actually sick with the flu they cannot spread the flu.

  6. Has a single Canadian MP stood up in Parliament and made a speech like this? And if they did, would the Canadian media even report it?

    1. Has a single Canadian MP stood up in Parliament and made a speech like this?

      Given the propensity of our media and government to memory-hole such activities, how the Hell would we even know?

    2. Max has been arrested for speaking out about the insanity. Sloan has been speaking out about it around the country and Hillier in Ontario.

  7. L – The price of electing scientifically illiterate, invertebrates to elected office is:
    massive unnecessary suffering and death and economic impoverishment in Canada.

    Just as Marxist agriculture starved millions in the Soviet Union and Communist China.
    Here we have Marxist Medicine killing and maiming huge numbers of individuals.

    Socialized Medicine without the Scientific Method isn’t medicine. It’s a crime against humanity.

  8. Just to let you know that the politician Craig Kelly has been banned from YouTube and Facebook and been described as a conspiracy theorist by Australian MSM. He has also resigned from his party (Liberal equ to Republican in USA) as they disowned him.

  9. I’m all for being skeptical and not just appealing to authority but the shrill anti-vaxx path of SDA is getting cringe.

    1. It isn’t anti-vax. It’s anti- quackery.
      By all means, get yourself a dose of DNA altering vaccine for a disease with a survival rate of 99.85 percent.

    2. Jeff, I’m glad there were no adverse side effects for you from the jab. Just as I’m glad I’m not experiencing any adverse side effects from ivermectin. Unfortunately my (until then healthy) neighbour nearly died of a blood clot shortly after her jab. She was airlifted three hundred km to the hospital.

      If you figure I’m antivax because I’m anti-jab, I’ll counter that you’re an uninformed politician. Many medical people are not pro jab.

  10. You’re talking about vaccines here. Pfizer also has drugs for the treatment of the Wu flu. They run about nine hundred a dose.
    There’s no money in cheap drugs, and with big pharma it’s always about the money.

    1. To be fair, Big Pharma are not meant to be social workers. They exist to make a profit. The problem is state’s willingness to roll over to them and grant them monopolies.

    2. And they can’t get the fast track emergency authorization for a new drug if an existing safe one like Ivermectin works.

      Billions of dollars…

  11. Those 780 health workers who didn’t get the virus are Covid Deniers.
    The gummint needs to infect them with Covid to be fair to the others who did get Covid.

  12. Much better study and newer, June 2021, peer reviewed and all that.


    For those of you who don’t care to wade through a long detailed statistical analysis appropriate to a well prepared meta analysis

    “Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.”

  13. Try these pages, quite well done
    Vitamin D for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 90 studies
    Covid Analysis, Jul 21, 2021, Version 70 — added Savitri (V1 Dec 17, 2020)
    @CovidAnalysis Share Tweet PDF Studies Submit Feedback
    •90% of 30 vitamin D treatment studies report positive effects (15 statistically significant in isolation).
    •Random effects meta-analysis with pooled effects using the most serious outcome reported shows 78% and 47% improvement for early treatment and for all studies (RR 0.22 [0.12-0.39] and 0.53 [0.44-0.64]). Results are similar after restriction to 27 peer-reviewed studies: 83% and 51% (RR 0.17 [0.07-0.42] and 0.49 [0.38-0.63]), and for the 18 mortality results: 78% and 57% (RR 0.22 [0.12-0.43] and 0.43 [0.29-0.63]).
    •Late stage treatment with calcifediol/calcitriol shows greater improvement compared to cholecalciferol: 80% versus 43% (RR 0.20 [0.13-0.31] and 0.57 [0.39-0.83]).
    •Heterogeneity arises from many factors including treatment delay, patient population, the effect measured, variants, the form of vitamin D used, and treatment regimens. The consistency of positive results across a wide variety of cases is remarkable.
    •Sufficiency studies show a strong association between vitamin D sufficiency and outcomes. Meta analysis of the 60 studies with pooled effects using the most serious outcome reported shows 57% improvement (RR 0.43 [0.35-0.52]).
    •While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 7% of vitamin D treatment studies show zero events in the treatment arm.
    •Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Not doing so increases the risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and increases mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage.
    •All data to reproduce this paper and the sources are in the appendix.

  14. And for the 2d leg, here’s the Ivermectin meta review page:
    Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 60 studies
    Covid Analysis, Jul 20, 2021, Version 101 — removed Elgazzar, updated Hashim (V1 Nov 26, 2020)
    @CovidAnalysis Share Tweet PDF Studies Adoption Submit Feedback
    •Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 74% and 85% improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis (RR 0.26 [0.16-0.43] and 0.15 [0.08-0.25]), with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis, restriction to peer-reviewed studies, and restriction to Randomized Controlled Trials.
    •64% and 96% lower mortality is observed for early treatment and prophylaxis (RR 0.36 [0.15-0.85] and 0.04 [0.00-0.59]). Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, cases, and viral clearance. 26 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation.
    Studies Prophylaxis Early treatment Late treatment Patients Authors
    All studies 60 85% [75‑92%] 74% [57‑84%] 43% [26‑56%] 21,838 574
    With exclusions 50 88% [75‑94%] 76% [66‑83%] 50% [28‑65%] 17,437 513
    Peer-reviewed 39 88% [70‑95%] 75% [59‑84%] 43% [21‑59%] 11,593 408
    Randomized Controlled Trials 30 84% [25‑96%] 67% [54‑76%] 30% [2‑50%] 5,206 358
    Mortality results 23 96% [41‑100%] 64% [15‑85%] 59% [35‑74%] 10,797 236
    Percentage improvement with ivermectin treatment

  15. More at the link as they say.
    Deep dive the data, very rich resource and easy to drill down, export as PDF and so on.
    Thorough website, clearly a quite knowledgable crew that put this together, very well done IMHO.
    Try this one too; Analysis of the efficacy of early treatments for COVID-19
    And the FAQ’s are an Interesting read