When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal

17 Replies to “When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal”

1. It has been shown now that US laws have political biases.

2. What changed for Judge Sullivan?
   What facts of the case emerged that made him change his mind from his previous decision to not dismiss the charges?

   If he could dismiss the charges now why couldn’t he dismiss them months ago?

   1. why couldn’t he dismiss them months ago?

      Reply: Nancy didn’t want Trump to win anything….The POPE was pissed

      1. Because he is a petulant, corrupt Democrat.

         If you dig, he has a shady past, including covering for his criminal son, getting charges thrown out, with the cops assisting, while on the bench. Of course, that’s JUST speculation.

         He’s dirty as NY snow

   2. Stan, because O’Butthole!!!!

3. In the Ununited Soviet States of America, USSA, all institutions go through a partisan, soon to be one party lens.
   Hillary committed a crime, but didn’t mean to. Donald Trump didn’t commit a crime, but meant to. Justice depends on party.
   Your identity is your party affiliation. A minority subjected to oppression? Nope, only happens to Democrats.
   Candace Owen is a white supremacist. Changing state laws without consent of legislatures is good governance.
   Everybody’s a politician, scientists, judges, big tech oligarchs, the neo untouchables, free to lie to courts and oblivious, naïve voters
   Your freedom, career and your life will soon be judged by your vaccination/party papers, with good sycophants first in line.
   When will people understand they’re voting for, not against policies and leaders, replacing something with nothing?

   The bland leading the bland. Their failed policies do zero and likely worsen covid “cases,” so in collectivist boilerplate fashion, they double down on their failed measures while blaming and punishing those who play by the rules. Soon, none of that will matter, you’ll be told what kind of car to drive, what place to live in, what the apparatchiks allow.

4. didn’t John Epstein Roberts say there were no political judges??

   1. Can the 25th Amendment be used against a SCOTUS Judge? Because there’s something deeply WRONG with Roberts. A psychotic personality defect whereby he issues rulings accompanied by a Satanic smirk like Strozk’s.

      Oh, sorry … you don’t believe in Satan. Or is that only God you eschew?

      1. Kenji, Lin Wood posited the question if the own of the name John Roberts, that appeared on the Epstain flight logs, had been identified?

         1. How is that trial (presumably) of Ghislaine Maxim coming along? Where’s the dirt?!

5. Yes, Judge Sullivan … moot. Not the case … but YOU! YOU are moot.

6. The flailing last gasps of the deep state, or so it would seem. Only the SCOTUS can save the Republic now.

7. Sullivan should be removed from civilization – he has no respect for the laws that form a society. Dump him on a deserted island somewhere. If God forgives him, then Sullivan will survive the fall from the helicopter and can live out a quiet life away from humanity.

8. At a minimum he should be charged with abuse of power while still on the bench, and then removed.

   He wanted to make an example of Flynn and show everyone what happens when you challenge Democrat state power, an example should be made of him, and many like him.

9. Sullivan should be disbarred, not simply removed from the bench.

   1. Sullivan should be LYNCHED, not simply removed from the bench.

      FIFY

      1. Well, I’m gaining a preference for the old English punishment for sedition. I can’t describe it here or I’d be banned. Just look up what really was done to William Wallace; the movie Braveheart was HIGHLY sanitized.