Target rich environment: “They’re already prepared to attack reporters. ‘Any reporter who tries that will be hit with 30-second spots of all their ridiculous claims about collusion,’ said the source, who, like others interviewed for this story, requested anonymity to describe private conversations. ‘Their tweets have all been screencapped. It’s all ready to go..
Link?
Safari cannot open page. Url not shown (?)
Is this the link?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/03/trump-wants-campaign-mueller-report-2020/585967/
“An armed society is a polite society” works on so many different levels.
Link to nowhere.
I hope they have files on never-Trump cheerleaders Keith Boag, Lyndsay Duncome, Steven de Souza and Paul Hunter (don’t know if I spelled the names right; don’t care) from the CBC’s Washington bureau. They probably don’t care what the CBC flock in Canada says.
Ms McMillan, I recommend that you seriously consider requiring (real) full names on any comments. The requirement (self-imposed in my case) requires the correspondent to pause before sending. If you can’t have your name attached to a comment, why make it? I don’t read your comments a lot, but I do see senders who confuse automatic gainsaying with witty repartee.
Many of my beliefs are contrary to those of my employer. Your requirement would silence me because I would not be willing to risk my job by publicly opposing them. Few in senior ranks are woke, but their numbers seem to be increasing.
So reporters are the sort of people who think someone pointing out what they’ve said is an attack.
Reporters are scum. Who cares what they think. I mean really. What kind of sick person would want to be a reporter? They deserve what ever scorn is cast upon them.
It’s nice to see actual battle preparation for once, with proper recognition of who the enemy is.