When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal

More here.

9 Replies to “When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal”

  1. The FBI … didn’t want to get CAUGHT … using the COLOR of AUTHORITY … to ILLEGALLY, and UNCONSTITUTIONALLY … SPY … on a candidate that THREATENED the Deep state autonomy.

    There, I, rewrote the offending and absurd observation by the NYT’s

  2. Heh

    The FBI has working there some clever people. They figgerd (sic) it out.
    So wise, stand back.

    Are these not actions of a police state? Kind of, sort of, something like the national socialists, fascists, “democratic” socialists or them communists would do.

    When will the ‘merican people wake up to the realization that their republic is rotting, degenerating into a police state totalitarian dictatorship?

    What the hell is going on? They, the big giant head decided to call those that point it out, populists.
    Are you bloody kidding me.

    They are at the forefront to socialism.
    To call Trump all those names like fascists, Nazis and other such is to distract and cover their tracks of where they want to be.

    1. Lev, I agree. Trump messed up and stopped the progress along the path that the Marxist social progressives were taking the US. The corruption in the FBI is not the only governmental institution in which this is happening. The snake is everywhere. See my today’s reader tip for how this has happened.

  3. I have a lot of time for Mollie. What a level headed clear thinker who will always stand up for her (and my own) convictions! Oft outnumbered, but absolutely genuine! Brava.

  4. Gotta wonder how much of this stuff is working itself into our agencies. The Jasper Atwal affair and Mr. Daniel DickHead Jean’s lapdog response at the request of PM Spawn to save his face shows us that we might be losing the security state’s apolitical foundation. That ain’t good with a narcissistic mental case heading the tyrannical Liberal Party of Canada show.

  5. Speaking of rigged…if you are looking for an alternative to Twitter (who now admits that Shadowbanning opinions they don’t agree with is their policy)… give GAB.ai a look. Very similar platform founded by a free speech Libertarian…with about 500,000 participants at the moment…and about to grow significantly.

    I know, off topic…but then again…somewhat relevant.
    Cheers,
    Orson

  6. The question now is has Mueller given Comey immunity… The FBI gave all the Hillary bad actors immunity…that ended the investigation.

    When Comey testified before Congress he was asked if Hillary’s (under oath) lies to Congress were investigated. He said her statements were not within his scope of investigation… Sounds odd that prior perjury is not relevant to the FBI… Was Comey on a short leash….

    Getting hot for Comey if he doesn’t have immunity….

Navigation