Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Don't Run
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Trolling skill level: well over 9000.
“Julian Assange’s internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party.”
Yes, but if you know it’s a “state party”, why not identify the state?
Surely that’s exactly the sort of thing an outfit like WikiLeaks would want to expose?
They have, it was Equador.
Funny, but I for one am worried about Assange. His treatment has been a travesty of justice and danger to him seems to be increasing in recent days. Now who do you suppose might be behind that?
The activist organization WikiLeaks says the Internet connection for its founder, Julian Assange, has been severed by what it called a “state party.”
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/10/17/498243075/wikileaks-says-julian-assanges-internet-access-cut-off-by-state-party
Let’s guess who threatened the Ecuadorian government and server.
WikiLeaks talks about a “contingency” plan. Hopefully it works out for him.
I never supported Assange in the past, but, considering what we have collectively discovered about the evil cabal trying to consolidate its power in the US and over the American people, I have a 180 and hope he exposes all the political corruption in the US. Maybe he could also expose the political corruption in Ottawa. One can wish.
Asange is a hero.
That one man, with a bit of help, has done more for the cause of justice than every state player in the world for the last two decades.
Unless or until the unknown “state party” is actually “named and shamed”* by WikiLeaks, we are left to conclude either hypocrisy** or fantasy or a mixture of both on Assange’s part.
* And I mean with substantive proof here, not with accusations.
** An organization putatively dedicated to getting secret dealings out into the public forum that won’t identify a “state party”?
“[It] was Ecuador.”
(Should have read your comment before posting my last.)
“We can confirm Ecuador cut off Assange’s internet access Saturday, 5pm GMT, shortly after publication of Clinton’s Goldman Sachs speechs [sic].”
– WikiLeaks
Proof please? Or are we supposed to just take Assange’s word for it?
Now if Ecuador did indeed cut off Assange’s Internet access, will he denounce his hosts?
Will he leave the embassy on principle?