How do you legitimize neo-Nazis?
Right-wing protesters, including known neo-Nazis, marched through Berlin’s government quarter on Saturday, chanting “Merkel must go” and “We are the people” in an anti-immigration rally that drew ten times more people than police had expected.
Create the society they warn of.
Update: Angela Merkel is punished in crucial state elections as far-Right party wins big vote with call to stop flow of refugees
Here we go again – Nazis were NOT “right wing”, they were @#$% socialists! When will the media stop trying to rewrite history? That was a rhetorical question, I know they will never reform.
The funny thing is that these protesters pretty much want one very specific small thing. They simply want the flow of immigrants from the Middle-East and Africa to stop. They understand that the majority of people are not in any danger and are choosing places of asylum based on social benefits and quality of life.
Considering how a large part of the population want the same thing they will have political success if they get organized.
What will probably happen next is a mainstream party will adopt the same position as these protesters and win the next elections big.
Germany is currently governed by a woman who has clearly been driven insane by her loathing of her own Country.
I wish the best of luck to whoever removes that lunatic from Office,by whatever means necessary.
Progressives pretend to hate NAZI’s, but are actually of that political bent, but to give them the benefit of the doubt,maybe they are so far “gone” they don’t consciously recognize that.
Germany and the rest of Europe is not going to find it’s salvation in a “nice” Leader.
This is a Euro/Brit thing. There is no “right” in Europe/Britain, only 50 shades of left. So in their addled minds, a “right-winger” is the leftist on the extreme right of the left spectrum. All of the real right wingers headed for the colonies decades ago….
If you don’t love and respect Islam and Muslims…..you are a Nazi.
You should get to know some neo-Nazis (they’re not hard to find — some even hang out here on SDA). They do in fact share a number of “right-wing” traits — only, by definition, with more extreme fervour. Things like nationalism, anti-immigration, xenophobia, rejection of egalitarian social and economic policies, nativism.
Along the left-right political axis, both extremes — left and right — reject capitalism and support heavy-handed authoritarian action. The key difference is in how they understand equality.
kt >
So what you’re saying is that Feminists, Gays, Hezbollah, and Hamas have allot in common.
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=1fe37eb3-0908-4dc3-99fb-c076cea69e17
http://www.blogwrath.com/canada-anti-semitism/toronto-anti-semites-and-terror-supporters-rally-against-israel/6078/
Yup they do indeed all march together on Canadian streets.
“the whole of National Socialism” was “based on Marx”.
Marx’s error, Hitler believed, had been to foster class war instead of national unity – to set workers against industrialists instead of conscripting both groups into a corporatist order. His aim, he told his economic adviser, Otto Wagener, was to “convert the German Volk to socialism without simply killing off the old individualists” – by which he meant the bankers and factory owners who could, he thought, serve socialism better by generating revenue for the state. “What Marxism, Leninism and Stalinism failed to accomplish,” he told Wagener, “we shall be in a position to achieve.”
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100260720/whenever-you-mention-fascisms-socialist-roots-left-wingers-become-incandescent-why/
Even Netflix couldn’t dream up anything as whacked as the ongoing EU reality show. I think the final season is playing out right now. It’s gonna a be a blood bath once the gun runners have armed the human side of the equation.
J >
Absolutely!
The Liberal “Progressive” Left has been herding Europe towards Civil War for decades now.
It looks like they will finally get their wish.
“So what you’re saying is that Feminists, Gays, Hezbollah, and Hamas have allot in common.”
Sure, some feminist and LGBT groups share with Hezbollah and Hamas a general opposition to Israeli foreign policy and the state’s treatment of Israeli Arabs. And sure, some feminists and members of the LGBT community are undoubtedly even anti-Semites.
Of course, none of this means that all, or most, or even many, feminists and LGBT groups oppose these things for the same reasons that Hezbollah and Hamas oppose them, or that they are otherwise in any way supporters of Hezbollah and/or Hamas. It should go without saying — though I know this is a point that has historically been difficult for SDA folks to grasp — that being critical of Israeli doesn’t necessarily make one an anti-Semite (though of course it doesn’t mean one’s not, either).
“Far right”…..meaning center.
“a woman who has clearly been driven insane by her loathing of her own Country”
What a stupid remark. To anyone who has bothered to examine her political career, her time in office has been devoted to keeping the hard left, an SPD-Green coalition, out of office. Please note that all of the gains of the right have been at the expense of the CDU. The hard left SPD and Green Party are as strong as ever. All that the anti-immigration parties are doing is fracturing the right, not the left. They are correct on their anti-immigration stance, but in the short term all that is being achieved is handing political power to the left.
“Germany and the rest of Europe is not going to find it’s salvation in a “nice” Leader.”
There will be no salvation of any kind. There are already sufficient illegal immigrants in Europe to plunge much of the EU into chaos for years to come.
Strange because Im pretty sure the Nazis and Muzzies got along quite welll.
A left/right axis means absolutely nothing outside of when the terms were coined during the French Revolution. The NSDAP and the Soviet communists were allies until the day that Hitler invaded the Soviet Union. This is when the Soviets decided to label the NSDAP as right wing, and they did it to distance themselves from the party who were there allies the day before.
Politics are way too complex to be defined on a line. you need at least a plane or three dimensional matrix.
Good point Markon, I had forgotten about that.
“What a stupid remark.”
What an inflammatory remark by an anonymous keyboard warrior.
Merkel has often claimed that because of Germany’s past, she cannot allow people in need to be turned away,thus she is allowing entry to all the ME’ers that want to come and partake of Germany’s generous welfare benefits.
I stand by my remark, Merkel shows every sign of having had what sophisticated people call a “nervous breakdown”, as she watches her Country fall apart, but refuses to allow anyone to even speak negatively of Muslim immigrants/invaders.
She feels massive guilt over the Jews, so is flooding her Country with people who are more akin to the NAZI’s she allegedly despises,than they are to civilized Europeans.
I can’t wait for “Oktoberfest”.
Well … they ARE ‘right’ … Merkel DOES need to GO … If Germany is to survive. America and Germany are the worlds two largest Capitalist economic superpowers, er “RICH” countries … and they are being taken-down from within by stealth (and not-so-stealth) Socialists. Merkel and Obama (and now, Trudeau).are within a 100k or so illegal immigrants of the complete destruction of their respective countries. The world is going to turn really, really, ugly. I weep for what I see coming.
Are you sure there will be an Oktoberfest this year? Pork has been banned from school menus, so why not prohibit a celebration where there are copious amounts of alcoholic beverages and pork sausages served?
FAR RIGHT GERMAN PARTY SAYS “SHOOT IMMIGRANT CHILDREN”
At least, that’s what the German MSM says. So it must be true, right?
Well, not really. Actually, not even a particle of truth in it. But it’s an exciting headline, isn’t it?
Here’s the media entrapment interview that started this, with Dr. Frauke Petry, leader of the “Alternative for Germany” party (AfD). They just won massive support in elections today. Frauke Petry is about as far right as the Canadian NDP. She has four kids, and wants better welfare and other new social policies. But she opposes open borders immigration.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Frauke Petry: [A border police officer] must prevent illegal border crossings. In emergencies, he can use firearms. That is in the law.
Mannheimer Morgen: There is a law that contains an order to shoot?
Dr. Frauke Petry: I didn’t use the phrase order to shoot. No police officer wants to shoot refugees. I don’t want that either. But the use of firearms is permitted as a last resort (Ultima Ratio). The important thing is not to let things go that far. We must put the brake on the stream of refugees by agreements with Austria and checks at the EU border.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So then Mannheimer Morgen runs off shouting that “Petry wants to shoot refugee children.”
Here’s how one level-headed German commenter settles the issue:
“Given that she represents the party which is the pinata of the mainstream media, she’s been denounced as crazy, as a fascist, or the new Honecker.
And yet she’s right. German law in fact does permit border guards to ‘use firearms’ to enforce compliance with border checks. Section 11 of the Law on the Direct Use of Force to Enforce Public Order by Law Enforcement Officials permits the use of weapons (g) by border guards against people who ignore ‘repeated orders’ to stop or to permit searches.
As this informative blog post at Deutschlandfunk (g) points out, courts have interpreted this provision strictly — a border police officer can only use deadly force for direct defense of his or others’ lives in a situation of ‘uncontrollable danger’. Otherwise, they risk prosecution themselves.
Petry never personally demanded that border guards shoot, and merely noted the law permits this as a ‘last resort’. Petry’s comments reflect current German law reasonably accurately.
Everyone who is outraged by them is probably better advised to direct their outrage toward existing German law.””
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But being level-headed is no fun, is it?
Sure: “extremists” abound in the left and the right. But leftist extremists are those who want to impose their views on the rest of us via intimidation, hatred, violence and top down state tyranny. Feminists, the BLM movement, anarchists, the LGBT crowd, etc. don’t want “equality;” they want dominance, mastery over the hated “other” and revenge on ordinary folk for having ordinary, happy lives. Glenn Reynolds on Instapundit said it well: “I’m beginning to think that most lefty movements are just about broken people trying to manipulate the rest of us so they can feel good about their broken selves.”
These days, the “extremists” on the right seem to just want to be left alone by everyone. They want to get away from the crazies and they want to build walls around the communities they create, to keep the world the way they like it. They don’t want to dominate society the way the leftist activists want to dominate; right-wing “extremists” are more like: “Fine, have your leftist, multi-culti and multi-gendered-identity-i utopia. Stay there and leave me alone. And keep your hands out of my wallet and yourselves away from my kids.”
Alas: the leftist extremists have our dollars and are indoctrinating our children, handily. So anarchists and activists can talk about bringing bottles full of urine to fling at Republican supporters at the Republican Convention coming up, and all the blame will fall on Republicans for even existing to have urine flung at them. It’s how the left rolls. And they’ll get away with it.
ANything that isn’t to the left these days is described as far-right.
To merely suggest that there is no free lunch, is to self identify as extreme right wing.
In the eyes of the parasites.
To suggest kleptocracy is self limiting and unstable… heresy.
When you let the glibbering assholes of modern media define your values, or “Inform you” as to someone else’s values, that is beyond stupid.
And if you tell a freeloader to fend for themselves, why you must be a far right national socialist.
Whatever that be.
Sounds like twister.
“alliance of left-wing groups, unions, churches and Germany’s Turkish Association”
here folks are those who WANT open borders, and yup, the CHURCH is right in there
And Skip has it rite, 50 shades of left, that’s all there is in europe, they don’t know what ritewing is, and that include the churches. Fact Merkel is a bible banger
Well said.
Exactly! Everyone who does not agree with the destruction of his national heritage and country is labeled “fascist, neo-Nazi” etc.
In Canada the Liberals have told us that because we do not agree with their vision we are bad Canadians.
“Sure: “extremists” abound in the left and the right. But leftist extremists are those who want to impose their views on the rest of us via intimidation, hatred, violence and top down state tyranny…These days, the “extremists” on the right seem to just want to be left alone by everyone…They don’t want to dominate society the way the leftist activists want to dominate; right-wing “extremists” are more like: “Fine, have your leftist, multi-culti and multi-gendered-identity-i utopia. Stay there and leave me alone. And keep your hands out of my wallet and yourselves away from my kids.”
Isn’t it pretty to think so?
Sorry, but it’s hard to take you seriously when you insist on defining your political enemies as violent, hateful authoritarians out to control others and yourself as some non-judgmental innocent party who “just wants to be left alone”? It’s just all a little too self-serving.
Question: do you actively oppose those on the right who want to limit the legal definition of marriage as bent only between a man and a woman, since that would be using the state apparatus to control the lives of “the LGBT crowd”?
Do you support others having access to abortions, or do you think the state should use its power to control other women’s body?
Do you believe the US and Canada to be secular nations, founded on the principles of religious freedom and the separation of Church and State and thus the right of your fellow law-abiding citizens to practice whatever religion they choose wherever they choose, or do you believe our countries to be fundamentally Christian nations?
Did you, like many others here, support a ban on others wearing the niqab in Canada?
“Sure: “extremists” abound in the left and the right. But leftist extremists are those who want to impose their views on the rest of us via intimidation, hatred, violence and top down state tyranny…These days, the “extremists” on the right seem to just want to be left alone by everyone…They don’t want to dominate society the way the leftist activists want to dominate; right-wing “extremists” are more like: “Fine, have your leftist, multi-culti and multi-gendered-identity-i utopia. Stay there and leave me alone. And keep your hands out of my wallet and yourselves away from my kids.”
Isn’t it pretty to think so?
Sorry, but it’s hard to take you seriously when you insist on defining your political enemies as violent, hateful authoritarians out to control others and yourself as some non-judgmental innocent party who “just wants to be left alone”? It’s just all a little too self-serving.
Question: do you actively oppose those on the right who want to limit the legal definition of marriage as bent only between a man and a woman, since that would be using the state apparatus to control the lives of “the LGBT crowd”?
Do you support others having access to abortions, or do you think the state should use its power to control other women’s body?
Do you believe the US and Canada to be secular nations, founded on the principles of religious freedom and the separation of Church and State and thus the right of your fellow law-abiding citizens to practice whatever religion they choose wherever they choose, or do you believe our countries to be fundamentally Christian nations?
Did you, like many others here, support a ban on others wearing the niqab in Canada?
Racist, Bigot, Nazi, Redneck… are all libtard labels for people they don’t like. In their world the labels ‘allow’ them to be intolerant of those others’ beliefs.
What’s happening in Europe and Scandinavia should be a warning to North America.
=This is What Happens to Countries that Muslims Occupy =
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a “peace-loving minority”, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
United States — Muslim 0.6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
Sweden shows what becomes common at 5% muslim occupation, and how political correctness ignores it and buries the stories.
“Muslim Rape Epidemic in Sweden and Norway — Authorities Look the Other Way.”
http://fjordman.blogspot.dk/2005/02/muslim-rape-epidemic-in-sweden-and.html
Sweden: A New Hell for Women
http://www.d-intl.com/2013/10/15/sweden-a-new-hell-for-women/?lang=en
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we’ve seen car-burning, riots, and now terrorist attacks.
As a group they simply cannot be trusted. They won’t integrate and will always want special treatment. We’ve already got a large group of first immigrants who do that. We don’t need any more.
“Update: Angela Merkel is punished in crucial state elections as far-Right party wins big vote with call to stop flow of refugees”
Not exactly. Baden-Württemberg was won by the pro-refugee Greens. Rhineland-Palatinate was won by the pro-refugee Social Democrats (SPD).
Yes, the AfD made gains, but so did the left-of-centre parties. If this was indeed a “referendum” on Merkel’s immigration stance, then the results were hardly conclusive.
Did you, like many others here, support a ban on others wearing the niqab in Canada?
The niqab ban related to covering one’s face at a citizenship ceremony, and banning face coverings for people in the public service.
Our culture uses facial ‘tells’ to determine if a person is being honest. For many good reasons we don’t trust people who cover their faces in public, especially if the face covering they choose identifies them as members of a cult that preaches it’s OK to lie, cheat, and steal from non-believers.
So if Hitler believed that ‘the bankers and factory owners who could, he thought, serve socialism better by generating revenue for the state’ is being paraphrased by those who want to tax the rich. Interesting. I also note that the phrase far right is being replaced by extreme right whereas loony left covers all contingencies.
“Do you support others having access to abortions, or do you think the state should use its power to control other women’s body?”
kt, I’m going to blow your mind.
“You do have a right over your own body – it is your body. But the foetus is not your body; it’s someone else’s body.” — Pierre Trudeau, The Montreal Star, Thursday, May 25, 1972
“Did you, like many others here, support a ban on others wearing the niqab in Canada?”
Well, I did. Because I’m an Canadian with real Canadian values.
But by all means, shine the shoes of your masters ky – they are counting on the brain dead to recite their lines.
correction *kt*.
Notice how I didn’t call kt a commie, like it/she/he is?
Hey KT. Can women sell their kidneys in canada. It their body right? If bill gates needed a kidney what do you think he would pay for a match?
So do women have a right to do what they choose with their bodies or not? Can they sell their organs?
I am doing everything in my (weaker) male power NOT to hit on you, albeit in some faux kind of Internet way. And for all I know, you could be some lumberjack-looking dude who cross dresses in the guise of a middle-class ‘housewife’. But I am falling for your clarity of thought and direct communication
If I can even dare to amplify your words, allow me to add this; Living here in the SF Bay Area, I have come to refer to the city of San Francisco as the “Island of Misfit Toys” (see; Frosty the Snowman animated Christmas classic, narrated by Burl Ives). The label is appropo because SF has become a magnet for every flake, whack job, and angry, militant gay in the nation) And the looniest of these societal misfits get elected to the SF Board of Supervisors. The board of Supes appear to have one single goal in mind … I.e. “correct” all the societal “wrongs” that they fled to arrive at their new island kingdom ( yes … I KNOW it’s a peninsula and not an island). Be it declaring SF a ‘Sanctuary City’, or choosing to not prosecute all “non-violent” drug crimes, or to mandate a “restaurant tax” of 3% to fund homeless healthcare (remains intact, even after Obamakare) … or to facilitate the murder of Kate S. by the hands of a thrice-deported illegal Mexican (the kind Trump referred-to). Ever since SF’s brothers in arms in Sacramento raised the Bay Bridge Toll to $ 6.00 during peak commute hours, I have avoided traveling to SF.
And therein lies the BEAUTY of angry leftists remaking society in their own degenerate images in SF … it is contained. I can live peacefully in my quiet suburb mostly avoiding the EXTREMISTS living in their self-imposed ghetto of political correct burg. I am happy because I can live my life in peace, free from the boot heel of leftist lunacy. I can “vote” with my automobile (non-electric) by never crossing the Bay Bridge. The PROBLEM occurs when STATE and FEDERAL government begins to resemble the Island of Misfit Toys. I will not tolerate my country becoming Obama’s de facto Sanctuary Country. The only “escape” available to me is the ballot box … and sadly … Donald Trump. Everyone else has already sold-out to the Misfit Toys.
No, I’m talking about the idea of a state-enforced ban on the niqab, full stop: http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/2015/12/if-you-asked-me.html#comment-1008203.
“kt, I’m going to blow your mind.”
And I’m going to blow your mind right back: Pierre Trudeau was wrong on abortions.
See how easy that was? The world actually isn’t the hyper-partisan, Team A vs Team B clash of civilizations that SDA portrays. It’s OK to disagree with those within “your own ranks”. Pierre Trudeau isn’t some sacred figure beyond criticism or reproach.
That’s actually a fascinating bioethical question that I would be happy to engage in, except I suspect your only real motive in posing it is to try to trap me in what you think is some kind of crippling logical inconsistency.
So I will simply point out for now that selling abortions for profit isn’t a thing, so your analogy is a false one. Apples v. oranges.
Live life however you want, leftists. However you want. Marry who you want. I couldn’t care less about your choices and your lifestyle. I’m utterly indifferent to it, in fact. Just stay out of my wallet, stay away from my kids, and leave my church alone. Just pay your own way. Your choices will have consequences. Don’t force us to pay for the consequences of your choices. Pay for your own abortions. Pay for your own STD medications. Pay for your own sex-changes and your own needles used for your substance addiction. Pay for the crime and security forces needed to deal with fatherless, feral children from social policies you promote.
Deep down, though, leftists don’t want tolerance and acceptance. They want forced conversion and revenge, and the utter ruin of those who live lives they despise. Plus, they need our money, since they’re an unproductive lot. The Instapundit quote applies to them: broken people manipulating the rest of us so they can feel better about themselves.
Separation of church and state: it’s the left that forces nuns to pay for birth control and Christian business owners to bake cakes for gay weddings (though the left is curiously indifferent to Muslims wanting to stop work to pray a few times a day in factories, or to not allow dogs or liquor in their taxis). I couldn’t care less what someone’s religion is, provided they leave me and mine alone, and what’s more, I respect others’ beliefs as vital to how they live and work. I would never demand that a male Muslim barber cut my hair, for instance, as a Toronto lesbian did a while back. I would find another hair dresser. I never did agree with the niqab ban … I thought the whole problem could have been solved with the lady privately showing her face to a female officer and then taking the citizenship oath. But Harper was still a better choice for PM than Trudeau, for a host of other reasons.
Let us go, leftists. You hate us. Let us walk away from you and make our own country without you. You won’t do that, though. While you despise our opinions and our religion and our way of life, you need our money and our work ethic and the stable communities we create to support you. If we got away from you, you would do your best to get into our new home. But we just want to get away from your soul-sucking, civilization-draining selves.
Kenji, I’m too old, frumpy, and have too many kids. Plus I’m happily married. You might find a lumberjack more fun to have a few beers with. But I appreciate the compliment. And look up HUD, by the way. The leftists know all about the happy suburbs, and their hatred is translating into action against these shelters, too. Hope your suburban shelter avoids the activist tyranny.
Somehow, nobody has a nimble mind and deep thoughts until they get to be ‘old’. However, frumpy is a choice 😉 Not to worry … I am not the stalker-type, and since I even REFUSE to join Facebook, or Tweeter, you won’t have me ‘cyber-stalking’ you either.
Oh, I know all-too-well what Obama’s HUD has in mind. A FEDERAL mandate to ‘diversify’ the suburbs with their ‘fair-share’ of low-income housing (read: urban thugs moving into town). Seems as though the government is ‘onto’ our plans to ESCAPE their hell-holes of sicko-diversity and (once-again) SHOVE IT down our throats – Federal-style. My own little town (and many like it in CA) is already under assault by the STATE of CA for lacking its fair-share of ‘low-income’ housing. We are threatened by everything from withholding of funds (re-distribution of taxes) to withholding our city charter … until we provide our ‘fair share’ of housing for the poor. Sorry, but it’s kind of hard to do when the ‘starter’ home price is well over 7 figures.
These State and Federal agencies don’t have a clue about how the FREE market works. You see, ALL of the VALUE of the town I live in is in the QUALITY ‘schools’, which is simply the result of QUALITY ‘parents’. I laugh when we are accused of SPENDING more $$ on our schools (we actually have one of the lowest per-pupil govt. funding in the State … which is nearly LAST of all States) and THAT is why our schools are so good. WRONG ! It is the parents. Our HS’s have a 99.99999999% rate of college-admitted students. Duh, their PARENTS are all college grads, type-A, intelligent over-achievers.
It has always been fashionable to BASH the suburbs as “sprawling” and “anti-eco” because they are automobile-dependent. All of this was just code for the suburbs being too “white” or too “successful” … er sorry … not “diverse” enough. So the shaming tactic has given way to the equivalent of FORCED bussing. If you can’t beat them, join them. HUD is trying to permanently bus po-people into our community. This fits the current educational narrative that the po-kids will become successful if they can just sit next to a smart kid instead of a gang-banger in training. Hate to break it to them, but it doesn’t work that way. They might want to emulate Ben Carson instead … i.e. start READING now ! put a book in your hands instead of a videogame controller (or MAC-10).
Plus … there is another laughable trend the Bay Area. Young 20 and 30-somethings (without kids) all live in SF or Oakland for the kewl ‘urban’ vibe of the ‘city’. They are ALL liberals ugggh – “progressives” However, the moment their first child reaches kindergarten age … the all FLEE to the (formerly mocked) suburbs. It is really laughable, all the young leftists who have sold-everything to get their butts into my little town. There was NO WAY they were going to drop their kids off at the neighborhood ‘urban’ school. AYFK !! NO WAY. It was OK for their kids to attend a diverse, pre-school and play with the cute little diverse ‘urban’ children with two mommies and whatnot. But at the moment play-school becomes REAL-school, they are GONE to the suburbs. Just another example of FAILED progressive thought … ‘celebrate diversity’ UNTIL it impacts YOUR child’s future … then FLEE to the white kingdom. Kinda like the Clinton’s and Obama’s putting their kids into PRIVATE school … all the while ‘talking’ about our ‘wonderful’ public schools and teachers.