When asked whether or not the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, is operating in the United States, Homeland Security Secretary (DHS) Jeh Johnson did not directly answer the question.
Related.
h/t Frank
When asked whether or not the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, is operating in the United States, Homeland Security Secretary (DHS) Jeh Johnson did not directly answer the question.
Related.
h/t Frank
Deash is now slowly coming into usage in Europe to describe these cut-throats.
In its original Arabic, the acronym of what they called themselves is close to the Arabic word Daes, which has derogatory connotations that fortunately closely resembles their activities.
Anyway, I’ve researched it.
It would be worth everybody’s else time to do their own research and change the terminology.
As long as Obama is president, they will not be allowed to say Islam and terror in the same sentence, because that is the religion of Obama.
Obama has once said the sweetest sound he ever heard was the call to prayer, the Islamic one, not the one from the Pope!
I guess at this point the question is confusing because first you have to determine whether the Administration is operating or not.
Slowly the layers are being peeled back from the onion. I was able to post an article written by a retired military intelligence officer who discussed the kidnapping of the two Qatari royals while on a falcon hunt in southern Iraq. In one of the embedded links he added to his story is the admission that the US created and funded ISIS. US troops are in Jordan training ISIS as I type this.
Alert citizens are also documenting and reporting the covert transport of unknown groups into the US under the cover of darkness and under the official state protection of DHS. I have witnessed first hand the caravans of unmarked buses protected by unmarked car police convoys departing an airport late at night. On another occasion, When I was returning to the US from Frankfurt, Germany, all “normal” families were detained at the gate and we were put through a secondary inspection and questionnaire at the boarding gate before we were allowed to board away from the Jet Bridge where it was not possible to see what was going on. It was INFURIATING and we knew they were up to “something”, which apparently involved having our passports seized by the gate agent and interrogated like WE were the criminals. (not just our family, but any “average” looking American family waiting to board.) Our seat assignments were also changed, even though we had paid for upgraded seats. When we boarded, the entire middle section of the plane had been already seated and the passengers concealed behind a curtain. We estimate about 120 or so were concealed behind the curtain. Any passenger who attempted to walk past this area was immediately interdicted by the cabin staff. These passengers did not appear in the normal customs processing area upon arrival. We were watching and waiting, staying at the jet bridge as long as possible to see if we could observe who was deplaning until we were shooed away.
Draw whatever conclusions you may from that. I’m not trying to blog whore on Kate’s blog but I am very worried about the recent increasing tempo of these types of incidents and average trusting people need to be aware and informed. Your own eyes don’t lie.
http://tinyurl.com/odhctfn
https://www.facebook.com/matt.bracken.98/posts/1076341742385265
The present US Administration is pro-ISIS (ISIL, Da’esh, IS, or whatever). That is evident.
The Left is pro-ISIS. They will not need much force to submit, i.e. to become Muslim. They hanker after submission to God.
It is interesting. The Sunni Gulf states (who have large Shia minorities) and the Saudis and Ergodan the Turk )not the military) are all devout supporters of ISIS. They give them money and arms and buy their oil.
But then things start going not according to genera:
1.ISIS wants a sharia state, just like Saudi, but Saudi is supporting ISIS and ISIS wants to kick out the Sauds.
2. The Shia are fighting ISIS and the Saudis.
3. The Turks have moved a batalion (roughly) of their army into Iraq, supposedly to attack Mosul, but just sit there.
4. Obomber pretends to bomb ISIS and yet cozies up to the Shia in Iran.
In finding answers to these riddles may help us work out what is going on.
1. The Saudis want to control as much oil as possible. ISIS wants to get rid of the corrupt Saudi ruling family and replace it with their own theocracy, a la Iran.
2. To be expected, this is like the West’s 30 years war. A religious war to the death.
3&4. Probably they are there to back up ISIS if Mosul is seriously attacked. It is interesting how uninterested the Shia or US is in retaking Mosul. Maybe there is an agreement between them along the lines of:
We want to keep oil supply restricted so that Iran can start pumping again now sanctions are off.
Don’t know what the US gets out of this.
Not sure this really covered enough ground to be useful.
Aha! Light just went on!
I bet the Turk batalion North of Mosul is there to guarantee the security of the oil supply to Turkey from ISIS.
The present US ‘administration’ isn’t only pro-ISIS; they are heavily involved in its genesis:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-17/missing-link-islamic-state-iraq-and-now-documented-cia-connection
For those who don’t want to follow the link, it details how one Johnathon Greenhill, who for 11 years (through Clinton, Bush II, and Obama) was
Senior Operations Director, Directorate of Operations, CIA, has on his RESUME for freak’s sake, the following:
“conceptualized and orchestrated strategy for an Iraqi Sunni movement.. to create an autonomous Sunni region in Iraq or an autonomous Sunni state”
Although he claims this was to “confront ISIS”, in fact, ISIS has absorbed the manpower and materiel the US has put into the region. Good job!
Shades of John Kerry “I was against the war before I was for it”.