Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Good God. Where was this taken?
Wouldn’t bother me to see some of Canada burn a bit, lets start with the mosques.
Muslims in general come across as cowards, and this is just another one those disrespectful cowardly acts.
Stephen, it was taken in Toronto.
Mosab Hassan Yousef, author of “Son of Hamas”, says there is no such thing as a moderate Muslim, only one who has not yet decided to take his mission seriously.
The apologist trolls are already working overtime on the newspaper message boards claiming that no muslim would ever use allah’s name like this, that it had to be an ignorant white kid just trying to stir up trouble. I just have one question to these fools, what do the muslim fanatics shout when they blow up a bus full of innocent children?
Can’t be an ignorant white kid. The spelling is correct.
Nothing a mass deportation wouldn’t cure.
@knacker
LOL!!
i don’t understand why they wait until an event to show thier true colours.
The Sun has a story on this … http://www.torontosun.com/2012/11/12/coronation-park-war-memorial-defaced-canada-will-burn-praise-allah
Toronto has become the worst city on the continent.
This calls for reciprocity.
Go to the nearest mosque,and scrawl “Allah will burn,praise Canada”.
Then sit back and see which one is prosecuted in the MSM and HRC’s as a hate crime.
I’ve always been against our involvement in the Afghan conflict for two reasons – first, I do not feel traditionalist Afghanis are worthy of the sacrifices our people make attempting to pull them from their mediaeval tyranny/squalor, and secondly the majority of Afghanis don’t want our help nor do they favour a liberal democracy over Sharia tyranny and theocratic barbarism. I have no animosity or hatred of the Afghan people – they are what they are – an unevolved barbaric tribal culture. One can no sooner blame them for this than one can blame a hyena for being a hyena. You don’t “hate” the hyena because it is by nature a savage pillaging tribal creature but neither do you go looking for trouble attempting to domesticate it nor do you open your home to undomesticated wild animals and allow them the run of the place. Such wild creatures are best left alone because any attempt to change their strongly engrained nature almost always results in having to kill the creature when it violently resists change (domestication) – just as some atavist cultures are best left to their insular xenophobic tribal ways – to change them you must fight and kill them – why? This is so counter-productive and hypocritical of liberal democratic conventions. Just leave them alone to evolve at their own pace. Even progressives like Margret Mead knew this.
One of the benefits of libertarian non-aggression/non-interventionist foreign policy is the fact you never find yourself suffering loss of military personel to protect/change people who neither want it nor deserve it. And the highlight of libertarian immigration policy is the entry safeguards which ensure you only naturalize immigrants who are culturally compatible with, or accommodating of the established national culture. We are a liberal democratic nation and a free society under rule of common law – if an immigrant has enough distaste for this convention that they engage in radical protest to change it, perhaps they have not chosen the right nation to adopt as a new home. We save ourselves a lot of fractious divisive social disruption if we ensure culturally unaccommodating people never come here in the first place – we shouldn’t meddle in changing their culture any more than we want them changing ours – it’s the least we can do to keep faith with our fallen who died to defend our liberal democratic culture and its free society.
Hey Mr Ford.Did Mr Kahdr and his muzzie family phone you and say sorry,wasn’t us moderate muzzies. Of course not,because as noted above,there is no such thing as a moderate muzzie.
Although the msg is true,and Tarawna is a good place to start.
Deport the savages. Citizenship papers are irrelevant to them, let’s use the same criteria – their ‘citizenship’ is irrelevant to civilized people.
“I’ve always been against our involvement in the Afghan conflict for two reasons”
I can give you more reasons, ones the media never reported.Afghanistan has major oil pipe lines running through it.Why do you think the Russians spent all those lives there. Its all about big oil profits,and they waste our solders in order to protect it.Whats worse is these oil companies are American controlled, and Canada has no interest in protecting them.
My Jehovah’s Witness neighbours have been going around and saying essentially the same thing for years.
So the dude wants to burn…Canada.
Liberally, apply flame thrower which should burn the paint off PDQ. May also incinerate the graffiti artist with the spray can…
I believe Canada used the Wasp flame thrower tank in WWII, maybe the idiot wants to be a demonstration.
Alternatively, apply thermobaric weapon for similar results. You can blast them all the way back to MOAB. GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast
aka “Mother of All Bombs” and they can have all the ‘burning’ their little hearts and minds desire.
Obviously, this mentally challenged dweeb was trying to provoke outrage. If you are that discontent in Canada, we invite you to return to the dust swept middle east potentate of your choice.
Luke 17:1-2
1 And he said to his disciples, “Temptations to sin are sure to come; but woe to him by whom they come! 2 It would be better for him if a millstone were hung round his neck and he were cast into the sea, than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin.
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
Occam is correct. No multicultural nihilism exhibited in his comment.
One shouldn’t expect a non-uniformed enemy to act as if it were one. That’s also why fighting a war against such an enemy in their own wastelands under the rules of conduct designed for (relatively civilized) uniformed soldiers is futile and senseless.
Private discrimination is the only peaceful solution to creeping Shariah,IE, Zero civil tolerance of the retrograde religion enforced by warlord theocracy (shariah).
Given that private discrimination is not allowed by the state in Canada and the political establishment along with the institutional left sees all identity groups equally as constituencies, the (1400 year old) war is now in your backyard. Have fun with it!
Just keep bringing these proud new “Canadians” over by the boatload, while every country in Europe is trying to figure out the best way to get rid of them. Too late for them.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Opinion-Polls.htm
The difference between a radical Muslim
and a moderate Muslim:
The radical Muslims want to kill us
The moderate Muslims want the radical Muslims
to kill us.
Islam has no borders or real Nations. Only a Caliphte is recognized.Certainly not an kuffar infodel One or its laws.There is only the Ummah.
Islam hates Democracy. Why do we allow these people who want us dead to come here?
It makes zero sense, infact borders on the insane
Did anyone notice that the idiot reporter who covered this decribed the vandalism as “spray paint” …. ?
Because the vast majority of these people are ordinary apathetic human beings like the rest of us who are fleeing truly terrible conditions in their homelands and want a shot at a nicer life, and basic humanitarianism argues that we give them that shot as much as is possible and we can afford to. They don’t want anybody dead, personally; they just want to be left alone and are perfectly happy to leave the Jihad to that tiny crazy minority who actually want to fight it.
The problem is that, understandable and sympathetic as these motivations are, it renders this apathetic majority worse than useless when it comes to stopping the tiny crazy minority, because in both an ideological and a practical sense they become the human shields for the jihadists; no legal practice nor military action can ever be wholeheartedly embraced because nobody — not even the Muslims themselves, by the very definition of Islam — can viably separate the passive Apathetists, who have not actually committed any crimes, from the active Jihadists who have and do, and the cost to the passive nonhostiles is always deemed too high to seriously go after the active hostiles.
It may be that our concern with separating innocents from combatants is a tactical weakness that Islam, which does not make nearly so forceful or fundamental a distinction between the two, is bound to always have an advantage in exploiting. But I think it is still worth upholding that principle. Let us not pick up the Ring from a desire to do good.
@ Stephen J.
There are many sects within Islam. Of these, two are notorious for their promotion of terror — Wahhabi maniacs and Shi’ite Khomeiniacs. Many Muslims are pacifists, and as you correctly pointed out ‘are fleeing truly terrible conditions in their homelands and want a shot at a nicer life’.
62% of the American people do not personally know any Muslim. What one don’t know one fears — human nature.
As far as discriminating between civilians and combatants is concerned, Islam has strict laws of warfare. The terroristic cults/sects will neither adhere to nor acknowledge that these apply to civilians but they have no authority to rewrite the laws of war.
I believe this was don’t by a nonmuslim vandel, as, as muslim would use “god is great’, or Allah Akbar!!
The author was probably inspired by the CBC’s attack on our military. And I’ll choose to impose a reverse onus policy, just as the CBC likes to do, and assume the state broadcaster was the inspiration behind this attack until evidence comes in to prove otherwise.
And I wonder how long it will take them to say the Praise Allah part “might suggest” (editorial insert by the reporter/anchor, of course) it “could be” the work of an agent provocateur, whose aim was to pin this on Muslims.
If this “brave” individual had a reason to fear repercussions from such a cowardly and disrespectful act, we would not be discussing this now.
I would merely note that after WW II, the Rules of Engagement for Germans who attacked Allied personnel were SOMEWHAT different from the CURRENT Rules of Engagement. And I would also note that WW II was the LAST war the West has won. In spite of FDR and Truman…
@ Mark Matis at November 13, 2012 12:37 AM
“And I would also note that WW II was the LAST war the West has won.”
Well…sort of…kind of.. There are some Veterans out there that would argue we had decisive victories in Grenada in ’83 and Panama in 1990. On a scale of 1 to 10 they would barely register but since you put LAST in capital letters I figured I better throw this in just to keep yu’ honest:)
Remember boys and girls, this is what the MSM will claim is the VICTIM that committed this act.
This message was staged.