Not to mention “an apologist and propagandist for European Jewry, an elite tool of the Zionists, a fomenter of hate, a warmonger ideologue, a peace-movement slanderer, a Ziocon creep and an infiltrator. I’m a diatribe-mongering Islam-despising, war-loving former girl named Teri who had a sex change operation, a Coulterian protege-provocateur, a friend of George Bush, a shill for the Israel lobby, a CIA agent…”
That’s what his fellow progressives called BC journalist Terry Glavin when he wrote something they didn’t like.
Now he’s posted a new short short film by the guy who brought us the immortal “Spiders on Drugs” movie masterpiece.
This new one mocks 9/11 conspirazoids, particularly their “‘God’ spelled backwards is ‘dog'” mode of “deduction”. Don’t miss it.
Absolutely beautiful!lol
You forgot “racist”?
Seems like there are two sides in the conspiracy debate incapable of dealing with inconvenient evidence.
Like I told Terry, put this on a t-shirt and sign me up for 1/2 a dozen. “I’m a gatekeeper to the Ziocon false-flag hegemony”
Clinton cant get a BJ in the oval office wothout the world finding out but thousands of people involved in destroying the WTC and nobody talks, UH HUH. Fools, or is that tools?
Now that is an insult: shill for the Israeli lobby!
Still all better than being a commie.
This is a classic example of the fact that nobody hates like the neo-leftists. And their worst hate is for any FORMER leftist, who is considered a traitor. (That’s a trait they share with Islamofascists.)
It’s ironic, they’re exactly what they accuse conservatives of: intolerant, intellectually blind, historically ignorant, hypocritical, expediently amoral.
Well, in fairness, he is a peace movement slanderer. The “girl named Teri” bit is hilarious, though. Where on earth did that come from? Inquiring minds want to know.
And you’re just a plain old-fasioned slanderer, aren’t you, Paul Baglow?
SOMAS
“Paul?”
Nope, I don’t slander anyone. But leaving the impression that the peace movement are a bunch of Hezbollah supporters is slander, all right.
More here.
That’s “peace movement is.” Attention to detail is important.
Free: “Clinton cant get a BJ in the oval office wothout the world finding out but thousands of people involved in destroying the WTC and nobody talks, UH HUH. Fools, or is that tools?”
What has this got to do with the fact the 9/11 report was truncated and was totally vague in several areas. For me the question marks are up for WTC building 7 which came downin its footprint at faster than free fall after firemen and rescue workers were told to stand back because it was going to be “pulled”. This Building was not hit by hijacked jets and had a small localized fire on one office of 1 floor only…it was also a Federal building with disaster command centers for the FBI, CIA, FEMA, and the mayor’s disaster bunker…the archetechual plans state it was built to withstand bomb blasts and 2X the natural forces other buildings are built to withstand…but a small local office fire (extinguished early by the NYFD) Brings it down???? The official report ststes that the cause was largely “unkown”…yet all forst hand witnesses testimony was not compiled for the report.
The greatest disaster event in US history ( in the midst of the info age) rates the pathetically vague single report tabled by congressional commity?
Ya you can trust the Feds 100% and they never lie and are always right and have never been caught before covering up incompetence or wrong doing.
To even think so makes one a “constoiracy theorist”.
Sorry that anti-intellectural dismissal is too trite to hold water in the face of the weak investigation into the greatest disaster of our generation.