Margin Of Fraud

Margin Of Fraud 60 Comments

Among the analysts who question the legitimacy of Biden’s victory is Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert whose technical expertise was touted by the New York Times last September and who has been described as a hero in the Washington Monthly. It’s unlikely that either publication will be singing his praises for his work pursuant to the recent election. His damning analysis of the electronic manipulation of votes that occurred in the early hours of November 4 appears in a sworn affidavit included with C.J. Pearson v. Kemp, a lawsuit filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. His nine-page affidavit (Exhibit 26) describes how it is possible to manipulate votes, where this occurred, and sums up his findings…

Related: In this election, [Michigan] officials mailed out more than 300,000 ballots that no one had requested.

60 Replies to “Margin Of Fraud”

    1. President “select” Plausible Deniability doesn’t know his ass from next Tuesday, he knows nothing about what went on or how.

      He won’t wear any of this, which is probably as it should be for seniors with dementia.

    1. Having heard all the Arizona voter fraud testimonies on Monday,
      Dr Shiva’s, posted above and one below were the two best and most compelling pieces of evidence against Joe Biden, imo.

      h/t Quicksilver who posted this yesterday in case you missed it:
      https://populist.press/dod-cyber-officer-confirms-dominion-was-communicating-with-frankfurt-on-election-day-video/

      Read the comments section in the above link someone wtote:
      Chinese spy said Biden has already negotiated a pardon for his crime, if you can believe it.

      Today Rudy Giuliani and his team are in Michigan, I believe.
      Hearing begins @ ~8 am.

      P.S. I really like Dr Shiva’s graph. I saw the perfection of it instantly. Dr Shiva invented e-mail at age 14. He is a genius with 4 degrees.

      1. I thought it was pretty dirty of Arizona’s Gov Ducey to sign off on the election for a Biden win in his state right when the hearings were being held yesterday. The crowd there booed that decision!
        Rudy said that he called the Gov before coming to Arizona and Ducey wouldn’t return his call. Giuliani said after 50 years of doing what he does, he understood the rude gesture spoke volumes.

        https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/arizona-governor-ducey-defends-signing-off-fraudulent-election-dirtbag-ignored-massive-evidence-fraud/

        1. Dirty for sure, but the lack of urgency on the Trump side leads me to believe they are waiting for the results to be certified before bringing out the heavy artillery. This will ensure felony convictions for all who certify.

          I wonder how old Katie Hobbs will sleep tonight?!?!

    1. Cults and “condpiracy throries” are quite different. A conspiracy comes about when there is some evidence for nefarious goings-on, but the evidence is incomplete. This is not surprising, since those perpetrating crimes often try very hard to cover their tracks and keep some things hidden. Conspiracies can be quite real. Due to media conditioning, people have come to equate a conspiracy theory with something that is not true. This is foolish, and it helps keep the evidence of wrong doing hidden from public view. No one likes being called a conspiracy theorist because it has come to be equated with tin foil hats. In this case, the experts bring real knowledge to bear in their analysis and testimony, and it brings us closer to the truth. Suggesting they are influenced by a non-true conspiracy is an attempt to deflect.

  7. Conservatives will now finally have seen that the electoral process is pointless. Hope the left is ready to eat lead and shrapnel.

    History is a tough schoolmistress.

  8. I asked this question yesterday at a few sites. Why has no one been charged. There are thousands of fraudsters available. Pick a dozen from each area and charge them. The evidence then has to heard in a court of law and presenting evidence without a charge seems rather pointless. Judges refusing to see evidence of a fraud is then eliminated, as those charged have to defend themselves against the crime and the evidence. Not a legal eagle here but with any other crime that is how it works.

      1. To which I ask, why is Hitlery not in the Big House? Just her one e-mail by itself would’ve put anybody else entrusted with “Official Secrets” behind bars for eight years.

        “erase the caveats and send it plain” – that is openly ignoring the law on classified material, and she should’ve been arrested and charged as soon as it was made public. Why wasn’t she? – I mean apart from being a Clinton, and a Presidential contender, and figurehead of the Democorruptocrats, and the monster at the bottom of the swamp, etc etc etc…

        And the only answer I can come-up with is, “It’s good to be king!”

        1. To ask the question is to answer it. The FBI, DOJ, CIA, DOD, etc. have all been thoroughly corrupted and turned into Deep State agencies. Clinton was the ultimate Deep Stater and she was destined to be the next POTUS after Obama. Ergo the Deep State would do nothing and I mean nothing to stand in her way. Just as they will not stand in Biden’s way. He’s one of them.

          But Trump? No no no, Trump isn’t one of them, so he had to be destroyed. Utterly, totally destroyed. It will go down as one of Trump’s failures in office that he did not perform a substantial purge of the Deep State when he could have; I don’t think he fully grasped just how bad it was until they had already tied him in knots with the Mueller probe. Then he was stuck; any action he took to defend himself or to remove the bad actors would get instantly spun as obstruction and down he would go, with Deep State Republicans a plenty willing to fill his back with knives. By the time he finally got that past him, the pandemic was beginning.

          And still the Deep State had to resort to great trickery to pull Biden over the finish line. I suspect we’ll never know the true vote counts in those swing states. The Deep State has won. Great evil controls America now. There may be no way to save her shy of civil war.

          1. “Great evil controls America now.”

            What’s interesting is that the ‘great evil’ knows they are the ‘great evil’ and they don’t mind.

            I mean, who you gonna call?

          3. “To which I ask, why is Hitlery not in the Big House?”

            – Further, I really don’t understand why Slick Willy isn’t in jail too; and not just for his 26 trips on the Lolita Express ( – the which, he’ll never have to worry about any of Pedo Island’s underage girls testifying against him – they wouldn’t kill themselves either, anymore than Epstein did – ), but for his well-documented misuse of funds from the Clinton Foundation charity – which has gone-on after he ceased being President, so they aren’t covered by his blanket pardon when he left office. The IRS usually doesn’t cut ANYBODY any slack:

            “Clinton Foundation CFO Andrew Kessel made the admissions to investigators from MDA Analytics LLC – a firm run by “accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators,” who have been probing the Clinton Foundation for some time.
            Kessel told MDA “There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds, according to MDA’s account of the interview. “Bill Clinton mixes and matches his personal business with that of the foundation. Many people within the foundation have tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no talking to him.”

            MDA compiled Kessel’s statements, as well as over 6,000 pages of evidence from a whistleblower they had been working with separately, which they secretly filed with the FBI and IRS over a year ago. MDA has alleged that the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities, and may owe millions in unpaid taxes and penalties.”

            https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-06/i-know-where-all-bodies-are-buried-clinton-foundation-cfo-spills-beans

    2. These are civil lawsuits. Until someone with law enforcement authority steps up to the plate (FBI, DoJ) nothing happens. It seems clear that those operations are deep state.

      1. From what I read and see, at this point they are not even lawsuits, if they are then just who is being sued? I see only one side, who is being sued? One side standing up in court against a judge?

    3. Trump should’ve cleaned house from top to bottom and put in his own people. Everywhere. He found himself surrounded with the deep state clan who stuck around like flies, thinking that everyone would defer to him, the President. The gang he’s fighting goes back to papa Bush. He said so himself that he didn’t know just how deep the swamp was. I guess he just found out.

      I’m beginning to lose hope for DJT , seems like his only bestie is Rudy Giuliani who charges $20,000 per diem.

      If he loses this election because of fraud he has 4 years to plan and come back in 2024 with people of his own choosing. Ultimately, who can he trust?

      We’ve learned that the deep state don’t like guys with money who they can’t control. He made them sweat. They don’t like to sweat.

      1. It is one thing I always said of Trump; he is uniquely immune to being bought by the special interests, lobbyists, globalists, etc. who truly run Washington DC. He has his own fortune and doesn’t need theirs, so he’s perfectly free to tell them all to pound sand.

        Every other politician in Washington occupying some seat of power or influence is thoroughly bought & paid for. The ones who don’t play along simply don’t last. They serve a term or two, never advance, and then leave.

      2. There is one essential point to Trumps way of doing things.
        He wants results.
        Hi hires people and expect nothing short of desired result. If they don’t produce, they are out.
        That is how he run his business.
        The massive bureaucracy that is the US government does not operate like that, they would not need the hundreds of thousands paper-pushers.
        When they had a problem at the space station, the americans had all kind of special tools and they did not have the one that they needed so they had a problem, their ruski colleagues mentioned in passing that you don’t need a special tool when a hammer would do the job.

        That’s how bureaucracy works, the more obstacles the more need for meetings, rules, regulations and so on.
        If you have ever worked for a large corporation you may have noticed when you needed something simply done your flaky supervisor would tell you, just follow the rules.

        This is deeply embedded in todays psyche of the ruling class.

    4. Good question and you know the answer, VOWG. There is no evidence of crimes. Irregularities here and there. Some Republican individuals attempts at fraud here and there (and they were charged by the way). Some Democrat attempts at fraud too no doubt. But nothing to change one single district, let alone state results.

      That is why every single Trump lawyer to actually go in front of a judge admits that they are not actually claiming fraud because they don’t have any evidence of it anyone committing any fraud. They just don’t like the results so it must be fraud.

      Trump’s team in actual filings and statements *in court*:
      “[We] are not “proceeding” with allegations of fraud” (Arizona, Linda Kerns)
      “This is not a fraud case. It is not a stealing-the-election case.” (Arizona, Kory Langhofer)
      “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots.” (Pennsylvania, pleadings)
      “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any impropriety in connection with the challenged ballots.” (Pennsylvania, pleadings)
      “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any misconduct in connection with the challenged ballots.” (Pennsylvania, pleadings)
      “This is not a fraud case.” (Pennsylvania, Guiliani)
      “We do not plead fraud with particularity.” (Pennsylvania, Guiliani)
      “We do not plead fraud.” (Pennsylvania, Guiliani)

      Not once have they attempted to plead or provide evidence in court of anyone committing any actual fraud.

      They only do that when the cameras are on, the microphone is on, and the twitter feed active. But not when a judge is present.

      I used to think Trump was doing this to steal the election. Now I think he is just doing it to screw Biden and because he thinks you are all chumps who will buy anything he is selling.

    5. hey old fool, you don’t scare the perps too much, as evidence destruction then goes into over drive. They need to build a solid case, and be ready to arrest ALL the perps, before private jet embark for foreign shores

    1. Ya with Harris in tow. When she takes over she’ll have Hilary as V.P. then soon enough, HRC will be in charge — with Willie in tow.

      Billy, Billy, bo Billy, banana bana bo Billy, fee fie… bo Billy…B-i-l-l-y !

      And BO with MO in tow will go on to Comedy Show reruns on Netflix.
      And they’ll all take orders from Brussels, from the boss,
      Justin Trudeau, head of the One World Government.

  11. It’s hard to know what is the truth about claims about widespread fraud and a cheated election.

    – On the one hand, you have: Donald Trump, his family, his lawyers (but only in public, not once in court), most (but not all) Republican Trump supporters, far-right pundits.

    – On the other hand, you have: most Americans, every single Democrats, almost every single independents, many Republicans, even many Republicans who support Trump, even some of Trump’s own long-time close friends, Republican leaders, Trump-supporting and Trump endorsed Governors and senators, judges not appointed by Trump, Trump appointed judges, election officials not appointed by Trump, Trump appointed judges, independent technical analysts, left-wing news, right-wing news, left-wing pundits, right-wing pundits, multiple audits, multiple recounts.

    And also Trump’s own lawyers when they are in court – every single one of them claims fraud outside the courtroom, but agrees that they are not claiming fraud when they are actually in the courtroom where it matters, including Rudy “we are not asserting fraud” Guiliani.

    So hard to tell who is telling the truth and who is trying to spin a huge, devastating, embarrassing loss.

    1. hey twatthetrooth, they are buying time to get the whole picture, and all the evidence that is needed to convince even stupid people like you. Fraud is a whole lot different kettle of legal fish, so it is foolish to go there. The getting and understanding things before sticking your foot , that has dog shit on it, in you ignorant pie hole

      1. And yet they say, in court, they are not claiming fraud. Go figure, eh?

        The biggest fraud of the most important and sacred democracy – involving thousands of people, including die-hard Trump-supporting Republicans – and they are just “biding their time”. Go figure, eh?

        Election challenges aren’t about “the whole picture”. They are about votes, individual votes, and the counting and certification of same, which happens at the county and state level. And Trump has tried many many many many times, over 30 now, and has failed on every single challenge. He has not won a single challenge of a single vote.

        But losing once is not enough for him, I guess. He likes losing so much he wants to do it over and over and over again. He likes to be the biggest at everything and is well on his way to being the biggest and most losingest loser there ever was.

        1. fraud would cloud the issue, as it is harder to prove, and and is an issue the judge would dismiss much more readily, and it is a criminal charge, so hard for a civil lawyer to put forward . When you haven’t a clue, don’t git on the net an prove such, just some friendly advise

  14. The hearings about voter fraud in Michigan have taken on a new style.
    Tune in for a look, even for a few moments.

    (1) Rudy G is not there. (2) The witnesses only have 3 minutes to give testimony. (3) They are allowed to provide a written statement (4) not all of them are questioned (5) there is a panel of both Republican AND now Democrat state senators fielding questions.

    The ones that interrupt the witnesses are definitely Dems. Very weird today. Not like Arizona at all.

    Watch  LIVE: Michigan State Senate Committee on Oversight Holds Hearing on Election Issues 12/1/20
    https://youtu.be/X0-vyw9qbdw

    1. That’s because this is a hearing, i.e. a formal/official proceeding of the state. It has established rules of procedure and document/statement/evidence production.

      It is being conducted by politicians to appease Trump, and may result in some pithy statements or reports about the need to do some clean-up of election procedures, but one change one single vote and won’t stop or block certification, because they cannot.

      Arizona was a meeting of die-hard Trump-supporting Republicans that people called a hearing. It involved a bunch of die-hard Trump-supporting Republicans saying all sorts of things that they won’t say in a court of law.

      It is being done by partisans and essentially meaningless because it has no legal or political impact, and definitely can’t change a single vote.

      1. It’s the ‘process’ being discussed here today in Michigan. On voting day there was a lot of bullying, name calling, unwarranted threats and intimidation going on. There were cops who threw out Republican vote checkers for trying to do their jobs.

        This Michigan bunch call themselves the
        Senate Oversite Committee. What are they going to report? Perhaps a new world order, One World Government?

        1. I agree there is nothing to report because… there is nothing material to report on… and this Republican ploy is just window dressing.

          But every legislature has a standing Oversight Committee that is responsible for overseeing operations within its mandate, in this case elections. The Republican-controlled Oversight Committee has called hearings because they want to pretend that maybe there is something to be done here and to try to keep Trump happy. They may even write up a report saying there was evidence of some irregularities and they could have done a better job, but they won’t say there was any widespread fraud – because there wasn’t – and they can’t do anything about the voting – because they don’t have the legal authority and, besides, overturning the will of the voters would be criminal and fascist.

  16. Breaking: Barr says no evidence of widespread fraud – https://www.foxnews.com/politics/william-barr-doj-fbi-voter-fraud-2020-election

    “To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told The Associated Press.

    Is Barr now part of the Deep State!!!

    So let’s update the ‘how on earth can you tell who is a partisan sycophant and who is for the truth’ count:

    Claiming fraud: Trump, his family, his paid lawyers (but only in public, not once in court), most (but not all) Republican Trump supporters, far-right pundits.

    Claiming no fraud: Trump’s Attorney General, Trump’s Elections Cybersecurity Director, Trump-supporter/Trump-endorsed Governor of Arizona, Trump-supporter/Trump-endorsed Governor of Georgia, Trump-supporter/Trump-endorsed Governor of Nevada, all election officials in every state, all Republican state-level secretaries of state, many senior Republican Senators, many long-term friends of Trump, and judges who were appointed directly by Trump.

    You also have: a former Republican President and many from his staff who are regular conservative media pundits (like Rove), , conservative news, conservative pundits, most Americans, every single Democrat and independent, many rank-and-file Republicans (at minimum 30%), even many Republicans who support Trump, Republican leaders across the country, judges not appointed by Trump, Trump appointed judges, election officials not appointed by Trump, Trump appointed judges, independent technical analysts, left-wing news, right-wing news, left-wing pundits, right-wing pundits, multiple audits, multiple recounts.

    And, of course, Trump’s own lawyers have repeatedly claimed that there is *no* fraud when they are in court before a judge, when it really matters and is not just spin.

    Boy, it is so hard to tell the partisan sycophants from the people leaving in the real world these days, ain’t it?

  17. WhatsTheTruth:

    Thanks for your posts. As much as it pains me to say, you sound very credible to me. I was totally unaware that the fraud claimed in news conferences has not been claimed in any of the court appearances.

    I do believe however that all the statistical and probability claims will not be considered as evidence and that Biden will be president.

    But if this is true, the election was still stolen. Some poll has claimed that 17% of Dems polled have said that if they were aware of only 1 out of 8 major stories suppressed by MSM they would not have voted for Biden.

    HOWEVER, I have almost zero confidence in what I think I know at the present time.

    Oh, no surprise on Barr. I have said all along that no charges would be laid and that too many SDA people have been naive on this subject.

    1. The reality is that when you have so many people voting, there is going to be a lot of mistakes and irregularities.

      The reality is that when you have so many people voting, there is going to be a lot of hardcore blind partisans who try to criminally cheat, like Bannon voting twice and getting caught, or the two (out of 150+ million) who have been charged this year (they were Republicans, but there are hardcore blind partisans on both sides).

      Those mistakes, irregularities and truly criminal, actual fraud is small and doesn’t have any chance of changing the election, and happens EVERY election cycle.

      Then there is the reality that there is going to be political parties who try to put their finger on the scale to influence the election results. You see this with gerrymandering, voter suppression, voter ID laws, reducing the number of polling stations in areas supporting your opponent, blocking absentee/mail-in ballots, releasing made up stories of corruption to demoralize supporters of the other side, and mail-in ballots, etc etc.

      This to me is way worse because it is real and it all also happens to be legal. I’m not going to point fingers at either party on that one because they all do it to some extent in the US (though I have an opinion of which party generally wants to increase the number of voters and which party wants to decrease the number of voters). And the sad truth about all of Trump’s lies and misinformation campaign is that they could, in fact, do a lot better. And someday someone might use electronic voting equipment to steal an election or some other fraud so they owe it to themselves to continually improve and strengthen. Unfortunately, what Trump is doing is accomplishing the opposite.

      1. To clarify, I DO believe there was massive fraud. I really do.

        BUT, as mentioned, what is being offered by Team Trump, Powell and Lin will not be considered as EVIDENCE.

        Maybe there’s a reason the word “fraud” was not mentioned in the court appearances. They are trying to get into SCOTUS right? And within a very short time line.

        1. Problem with that strategy is that you can’t introduce new evidence at an appeals court. You can only argue law. And they all know that.

      2. what, that’s plain bullshit, with so many voters there is an easy channel to for fraud. As to your bullshit, why doen’t you explain the Dominion voter machine problem. And why did the CIA in Germany sacrifice 6 lives in trying to stop fellow Americans from taking control of their server farm, IF THERE WAS NOTHING TO HIDE!!!!

        1. That, in single paragraph, summarizes the entirety of Trump’s case: because there are fallibilities, there COULD be fraud.

          Problem with COULD is that it is not the way the system works. When you go to court, you go to court with a claim, not a possibility. When you ask the court to disenfranchise millions and millions and millions of voters, you need to bring some evidence of actual fraud into court, not the possibility of it.

          By your reasoning, should we just assume there is a ton of criminal conduct and Russian financing shown in Trump’s taxes? If there was nothing to hide, why go to such lengths to hide!!!! The world doesn’t work that way.

          The other problem with your it COULD have happened, is that it could have happened in 2016 as well when Trump squeaked out a win, and not just when Trump suffered a huge loss.

          1. But WTT, in 2016 polls showed a 96% probability of HRC winning so the incentive, the urgency, to execute a massive fraud just wasn’t there.

            One more thing. I expect nothing from the courts. However a state or states could fail to certify, tho that’s doubtful too.

            But as has been exhaustively documented the extreme number of improbabilities make massive fraud indisputable … but as agreed, not in the courts.

          2. Polls showed no such thing. Some models did.

            “But as has been exhaustively documented the extreme number of improbabilities make massive fraud indisputable”

            The guy who doesn’t know that polls aren’t models thinks ‘improbabilities’ make fraud ‘indisputable’.

          3. Just think about how massive the fraud you claim happened would have to be. Thousands of people, thousands of people at including right down to the smallest cogs in the system, thousands of people across many states – indeed the whole country because you don’t which ones are going to be really close – thousands of people across party lines, including elected Trump-supporting, Trump-endorsed Republicans (including 3 governors and their secretaries of state and lieutenant governors), Trump-appointed Republican election officials, and an entire computer company to boot.

            And not one person identified as actually doing any of that. Despite Trump using the DOJ and the powers of government to conduct a fruitless witch hunt.

            The conspiracy suffocates on its own vomit.

  18. News flash for those who have been eagerly waiting for the Durham report on the Deep State staged coup supported by the career politicians of the Uniparty and their hangers-on against Trump :

    Attorney General William Bar has upgraded US Attorney John Durham to special counsel ‘To Protect’ Russiagate Origins Investigation.

    https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/EoLkcecXcAAVB9n.jpg

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation