Good evening ladies and gentlemen, welcome to SDA Late Nite
Radio. Tonight, for your delectation, here are Bob Shane, John
Stewart, and Nick Reynolds, as the Kingston Trio, performing
Scotch & Soda, ca. 1967 (2:44).
As y’all know, for many years now there has been an ongoing debate between those who think that recent abnormal changes in the temperature of the earth’s biosphere have been caused by side-effects from the behaviour of homo sapiens, and those who do not think they have been so caused. It turns out that in practice they are both wrong: there have not actually been any abnormal changes in said temperature. As a result of the exposure of The CRU Papers, we now know that claims of such changes were fraudulently fabricated and perpetrated by the priests and believers of the fear-mongering climate-change faith system.
And, just as fraudulent claims by the false priests of any other fear-mongering religion claiming to be saving your soul in some non-confirmable way say nothing about the metaphysics of theology, so too the protection-racket extortions being perpetrated by the false priests of abnormal climate change say nothing about the epistemology of science.
What we have here is not science, folks, it is neither more nor less than yet another example of the never-ending phenomena of human mob behaviour so well illustrated in Charles Mackay’s 1852 classic, Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions & the Madness of Crowds. Like other frauds and bubbles documented therein, this one is now bursting due to the inadequacies of its own undergirding. Because of the degree of deployment in this case, the terminal phase of this bubble will take some time, but eventually The CRU Papers and Climategate will become known as the beginning of the end of the current Climate Change Bubble.
Meanwhile, homo sapiens will merrily continue on: first chasing and then bursting whatever other fraudulent bubbles happen to capture our mob fancy from time to time, such as various instantiations of collectivism and godism and dowsing and other mystical and paranormal beliefs. If it weren’t that somehow we seem to continue to incrementally improve our temporo-normative situation, three steps forward and two steps back, one might as well be a pessimist, but since we do, one might as well be an optimist (besides, as Heinlein pointed out: it’s more fun).
So, to be clear, my additional Reader Tip for you tonight, ladies and gentlemen, is: try to avoid saying that these recent results tell us something about science. They only tell us something about some people who were lying to us about doing science: they said they were and they were not. Don’t let their malfeasance reflect badly upon you by dint of your mischaracterizing it.
Your Reader Tips are, as always, welcome in the comments.