Margin Of Fraud

Margin Of Fraud 32 Comments

Andrew W. Coy;

One could argue, successfully, that January 6 on the Washington Mall happened because of the lack of integrity and guts in the Supreme Court. Because of their blatant disassociation with being a coequal branch with the presidency and Congress, the Court has lost enormous respect from half of America. This is dangerous to a democratic republic. One must ask, why would they be willing to do this? Are they cowards, crooks, compromised, or something else? Can these be the only answers to this seemingly impotent Supreme Court?

They were paralyzed by the threat to “pack the court”, so cowardice.

32 Replies to “Margin Of Fraud”

  1. The Democrats and mainstream media would ensure that the narrative of absolutely no fraud be enforced by threatening the Judges and their families through there media connections.
    Publishing where they live makes sure they say quiet and ignorant to the laws that were actually broken.

    Hence, the politicians all are free to be hypocrites in breaking laws that the rest of us are enforced by the enforcement agencies.
    To ensure their crime sprees are untouchable by packing court judges that are corrupted themselves.

    1. Jojo – I think Kate is on the money – Cowardice is the new default.

      In this classic Mark Steyn piece he analyses the origins of the unmasking of Jerry Sandusky ‘s child-sex activities. A 28 year old ‘graduate assistant’, Mike McQueary, stumbled upon Jerry sodomizing a ten year old boy in a locker room. He phoned his dad then phoned the head coach ‘the next morning’. Mark notes that later the NYT defended Mike’s decision not to intervene by suggesting what he did was normal. Steyn responds with “as the Canadian blogger Kathy Shaidle wrote some years ago: “When we say ‘we don’t know what we’d do under the same circumstances,’ we make cowardice the default position.”

      Steyn further points out the moral relativism of progressive thinking. when the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were revealed to be burning down the barns of Quebec separatists: “Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau responded that, if people were so bothered by illegal barn-burning by the Mounties, perhaps he would make it legal. Jonas pointed out that burning barns isn’t wrong because it’s illegal, it’s illegal because it’s wrong.

      https://www.steynonline.com/11000/penn-state-institutional-wickedness

    1. GG, I was just going to post that I wounder what all the info found in epstain’s island and new york residence holds. That has also ways been a question unanswered !

  3. There is no conspiracy. The SC looks at 500+ cases at a time during their conference. Many of these election cases were clearly flawed. Some were even DOA before the defendant responded.

    Flawed complaints
    Affidavits that didnt hold up to any type of scrutiny
    Asking for ridiculous relief (overturn election and install Donald Trump)
    Not understanding state election laws
    Filing against the wrong defendants (PA equal protection clause case)
    Bringing up federal questions on cases that were clearly only state jurisdiction (end at states supreme court)
    Misrepresenting the equal protection clause
    Misrepresenting the elections clause (ignoring delegation or a states constitution overriding the elections clause)

    The more you look into this, the more you realize Powell and Giuliani were absolutely full of it. Grifters to the highest degree.

    1. So nice to hear from a world renowned expert who knows all the minutest details and can scold the rest of us for not having any common sense. So wonderful to hear from someone so intelligent and in tune with the realities of the SCOTUS, someone who knows exactly how/if they think. Why, oh why, are you not transmitting these opinions to the major American media so they can spread them over the country and defuse this situation? Why do you keep these opinions in Canada where they won’t be heard? I for one would love to see you go to the USA and perhaps live there full time so that you could elucidate all them there peoples on the law and how it really works.

      1. Affidavits that didn’t hold up to any scrutiny.How in the hell would they know that if they refused to hear them.

        1. Do not ask questions from libtards that require logic to answer. In fact there’s no logical reason to debate ot even talk to liberals. These people are sick mentally retarded. Liberalism is mental disorder.

        2. Affidavits are submitted with complaints, that means they are heard. With a motion for dismissal, any accusations in the complaint or affidavits *that are not defective* are assumed to be TRUE.

          Yet most cases were dismissed. Some did go the course

    2. alla ASShole

      you are so much smarter than lawyers, 2 of who worked as federal prosecutors . Rite! You are just repeating lefty talking points, that have NO merit.a court is obligated to hear any and ALL cases related to election fraud, weather there are procedural errors or not. Tell me fool, have you ever been to a court during a hearing or trial case? Or are you like unDork, and have never seen a bar fight, butt will wank off about things related to the topic, but have never experienced. Submissions to a court on crucial items do NOT have to be FLAW proof to proceed

      1. You are just making stuff up at this point. There is no “obligation” from courts to hear defective cases from incompetent lawyers. If you could point out judicial precedent go ahead, but you cannot because it is a false narrative. Just like:

        – all election fraud is from the democracts

        – proving that election fraud exists means the courts will “install” Donald Trump

        These are only points that exist inside your echo chamber, not in reality. Go ahead and read some lf the rulings in these cases rather than a diatorted summary.

    3. WRONG. The 2020 Election was simply carried out under EMERGENCY Pandemic conditions. The SCOTUS has clearly signaled that ANYTHING and EVERYTHING illegal can be done in the name of “EMERGENCY” … even STEAL and disenfranchise the votes of (more than) half the country.

      Witness also the fact that the SCOTUS has done nothing about the seizure of rights from American citizens by certain Governor’s inner Fascist. Why? EMERGENCY Powers. The SCOTUS has signaled that these Governors can use ANY self-declared “EMERGENCY” to enslave the American people. Is there any doubt this is how the Third Reich started? Economic “EMERGENCY” justified the theft of all those “bad” Jews rights … and stuff … and lives.

      So what will the SCOTUS do when Special Climate Envoy, John F’ing Kerry OFFICIALLY declares a Climate “EMERGENCY”? That’s right … the SCOTUS has already determined that Co2 is a “pollutant” … so it won’t be a big leap for them to summarily allow the elimination of ICE vehicles, and TAX carbon to “SAVE” Americans. The number of American Freedoms and Liberties STOLEN in the name of a Climate Emergency will make your head spin. But not a peep will come from the SCOTUS.

      1. More lame echo chamber talking points with no basis in reality.

        Go ahead and read some of the rulings, point out SPECIFICS that were incorrect.

        Im waiting.

        1. All EMERGENCY powers that abridge Constitutional Rights must be temporary. That is settled Law. However, The High Court appears uninterested in determining just what is “temporary” … let alone what is a “justified” emergency. Remember “flatten the curve”? Which has now become … “wear your mask and DO NOT celebrate Easter … even if you’re vaccinated”. The SCOTUS must suppose that every business in America, which surely has been ‘TAKEN’ by outrageous … unscientific … lock-down, shut down “orders”, … can weather this endless storm of one variant pandemic after another.

          So how much longer will The SCOTUS allow this Great pandemic Reset Game go on? Until the entire Constitution is wadded up and thrown in the corner like Hunter Biden’s undershorts?

      1. LMAO they are grifters to the highest degree. No reasonable person should believe what she said. Thats in her motion for dismissal in Dominion v. Powell, twice. Do you want a link?

        Now why would she use the Fox News defence if what she is saying is true?

        Why would she file a motion for dismissal? If successful, discovery does not happen.

        1. alla, the CEO for dominion testified under oath that their machines were NOT hooked to the internet, so they couldn’t be hacked. Jovan Pulitzer said other wise, and hacked into one as he testified, so one or the other lied under oath, now tell me asshole, which one has been charged with perjury?

          BTW: you proven just how stupid and uninformed you are in previous topics, so now you should maybe give it a rest. Powell is highly intelligent and very competent lawyer , but the legal system is crooked as hell, the Flynn thing (emmet sullivan) proved that for us!

  4. It could be worse…they could have a court full of leftist shitheads like canaduh does.

    2. alla ASSHOLE, that doesn’t change the fact that one was wrong (lied), to the senate committee, and no charges, WHY

      see alla you always insist on putting your stupidity on display!

    1. Another grifter of the nth degree. What a waste of my time, please give me an address to send you a bill.

      – keeps talking about cases never making it to ajury, ignores that many cases did go to trial.
      – not all civil cases are before a jury, it has to be requested from one of the parties.
      – he compares due process of civil vs criminal cases which is a completely different process
      – quantity of affidavits means nothing
      – nobody said that the people filling out affidavits lied. The vast majority ive read are from people who clearly dont understand the electoral process. Wayne county comes to mind. It is not a matter ko black and white where if the affidavits are rejected, the people should be prosecuted.
      – mentions that affiants only need to have personal witness to be eligible for submission. Yet many of the affidavits even failed that low bar. Many of them are simply just opinion, or contain nothing but heresay which is of course inadmissable.
      – mentions Antrim county which has already been long solved. The hand count matched the machine count. The machines cannot change paper ballots. Therefore……
      – the Navarro report is nothing but partisan trash.

      You guys just eat this garbage up like cum guzzling whores. Think for youself for once investigate the claims instead of just watching pillow guys movie.

    2. “Jovan Pulitzer hacked an election machine during the runoff election. That is not disputed”

      He hacked a poll pad, which IS connected to the internet but not to thr voting machines.

      Grifters gonna grift.

  6. The New Republican Supreme Court Justices K. and B. are COWARDS to call it right! I don’t think I would want them on my team. Roberts is squeaky or oily which ever you would prefer…needs to resign. The American people have lost respect for the Supreme Court!

  7. IMHO
    Not compromised, cowardly or corrupted but threatened, yes.
    Someone went to their Godfather, bent a knee kissed a ring and asked for justice.
    Said Godfather made K and/or B, maybe both an offer they couldn’t refuse.
    Along the lines of nice large family you have there, can you protect them all,
    shame if something were to happen to any or all of them.

  8. Democrats are a criminal organization with thousands times more power than any mafia, Italia, Russian or whatever, they control almost everything from the media , the education system, the judges and police, the nobel prize, the pullitzer etc etc

    they don t car who they screw or if they get caught, there re no consequences for them 99.9% of the time.

    they stole the election, evidence of it is every where, yet dozens of corrupt judges rejected the cases.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation