Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Duhhhh!
Kinda tired, old looking, farmhouse I suppose, which is the part that doesn’t make sense to me:
http://www.standlikearock.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/obama-hanging-curtains.jpg
I have just come back from a comprehensive exam of a student in advanced general relativity; a difficult and
very mathematical subject. There were a total of eight persons present, in various capacities.
All were men.
This chart seems to sort of obfuscate the information that it purports to show. Wouldn’t a simple chart with two distribution curves, one for male, and one for female, work better?
Larry Summers, call your office.
if the scores were equal, 25% of the women would have been entirely absent from the test.
It could be showing that only very smart men and lots of them take the SAT test.
All this does not address the basic test….is it nature or nurture?
Shouldn’t he be putting a curtain along the Mexican border?
Nick, you beat me to it. But to a lefty, there is no lie as scurrilous, as wounding, and as feared as the truth.
Yes, but if the scores were for “Barefoot, Pregnant and in the Kitchen”, the women would win that one.
I don’t understand what this graph is trying to show. Maybe that proves the point, whatever it is.
I did a search with,
carpe diem blog sat scores
and found a graph that is much easier to understand.
Good point. It was not at all clear to me how to read that chart.
Personal observation: it’s not the people with the highest SAT scores that run the world. It’s the C students. Because social skillz or something.
Which is a good thing. Running the world is for morons. Advancing it is where the real good stuff is.
Seems a lot of folk don’t understand what “ratio” means.
I think Kate had better start a category called “Remedial math”, for those folk who like to comment on her stupid cosmology posts.
It not intelligence as much as differentiation of tastes. Women seem to gravitate to personnel interactive carriers, while men like cognitive lone wolf jobs.
We are attracted by what makes us feel secure, not necessarily what where good at.
Men & Women both are drawn to areas of responsibility that may differ from sexual dimorphism, or individual likes.
So somebody spent a fortune to figure out that most nerds are male?
Hey, I could have told them that for 60.97624% of the price which incidentally is $512,361.84 (Cdn) after converting from US dollars and applying schedule 6014-A relevant …
Wake up ladies.
I don’t understand the chart. What do the numbers mean?
Black Mamba, it took me a while to figure out what the chart was trying to say. First of all, a ratio is a comparison of two values. They decided to express the ratio as a decimal. A ratio of 1, on their chart, would imply an equal number of males and females would be scoring in that particular range. You will note that as the score numbers rise, the ratio of males to females also rises. That is: more males than females score in the higher ranges. At least that’s the way I understand it.
Oh, I know perfectly well what a ratio is. Just seems to me that the presenters of this chart, when faced with data that did not fit their preconceived notions, went out of their way to present it in such a way as to obfuscate the facts.
We all know what a bell curve is. Simply show two bell curves on one chart, blue for men, pink for women. That would show quite clearly, maybe too clearly that men’s math scores statistically exceed women’s math scores.
You could print a calendar with the dates of the month in one long vertical column down the left side of the page, with the day of the week printed adjacent to them in the next column. And you and I could work with that calendar, although it would be clumsy. Calendars have the form they do because they work best that way.
Thanks. Numbers confuse me and give me headaches 🙂
Numbers are not my strong point–as are blog administrators. Please??
The problem is that white males have purposely made mathematics too difficult. Bastards. How dare they. The solution is to dumb down mathematics. Oh wait, that’s already what they are doing in high school…..
Math is hard.