Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
I believe it is technically known as the Mann-Jones-Briffa Effect.
I prefer the review process provided by Kate, Wretchard, Marc Steyn, Anthony Watts, Publius, VDH and countless other worthies.
I agree with Ron. Again!
Who would have guessed it? Human corruption in Human science.
Ive gotten to the point I respect the office or orginizationsincluding medical or science.
The people are another matter.
Where you find oppurtunity to gain without output. There you will find the blight of human taint.
JMO
I wonder if they expected to find “Perfection”!
Man Vs. Machine
This fanaticism that mathematical tools (complex ideas reduced to thier simplest form) are superior to the laws of nature & an analog (Symmetrical) view of the Universe… are born in the world of f##king idiots. He, who is not perfect, may not create a Master Algorithm
The freaks are already deciding court cases, and public policy….
This Opinion may be that of a F##ing idiot….
If the University of East Anglia was in SK somewhere, then they would have STFU a while ago.
Not that their actual location is that much better for peddling this b.s., but the folks around there have pretty low expectations of their weather to start with.
Are the Brights not just attempting to create the perfect storm according to what they have been taught and have been circle jerking for a very long time?
The idea that science is now beyond the hoy polloy and must be dealt with by a high priest hood of PhDs has been foisted upon us by those who majored in the faculties of Arts and Crafts before being employed by the MSM. Of course if you asked many of the Prairie hoy polloy about pier review they wouldn’t give a hoot since we keep our boats on trailers most of the year.
Next up, That great scientist*, The Goracle writes a book on the discrimination against fat people by the Law of Gravity.
The Goracle thinks a more respectful name than “fat people” is “gravitationally challenged people”. He calls for a global tax-funded UN committee to study this crisis. He also calls for an international system of trading weight credits, to compensate so that gravity has effectively the same pull on thin people as on fat people.
* (Inventor of the Internet; scientific discoverer and chronicler of Apocalyptic Global Warming, Wups!, Climate Change, Wups!, Climate Disruption.)
Indeed, I agree with Phillip. Was the null hypothesis that the peer review system publishes only worthy papers?
How did this article survive the peer review process?
I don’t know much about gaming theory, but the whole “peer review process” seems like a complete inverse of the prisoner’s dilemma. The one thing that is obvious – it is being gamed.