16 Replies to “John Edwards”

  1. If mAnn Coulter is correct, it will be the first time. Anyway, I don’t he intended to insult John Edwards by implying he was gay. That would be like me calling mAnn a honky.
    Signed,
    Adam’s apple envy

  2. Because he rode a bike? What are you, twelve?
    Sometimes your blog reads like an episode of Beavis and Butthead.

  3. John Edwards is running the worst presidential campaign since Al Gore. From his phony I’m-on-your-side/mad-as-hell populism to his silly RFK wannabe posturing, he’s struck more wrong notes than anyone since Jimmy Carter, and his Michael Dukakis man-in-the-tank moment can’t be far off, especially given that Joe Trippi’s one of his main advisers. He’s a third place guy about to drop way down, and it says something about Democratic primary voters that this sort of nonsense has got him as far as it has. But then again, the second place guy apparently thinks there’s something to be gained from meeting with guys like, say, Hugo Chavez. It’s all very encouraging for the guys on my side.

  4. “Sometimes your blog reads like an episode of Beavis and Butthead.”
    Then my objectives are being met. Thanks for the feedback.

  5. And what objectives are those? Self-sabotage? Because that’s what you’re doing to your credibility as a right-wing commentator when you link to things like this.

  6. Sarcasm is wasted on the left. It requires an open fertile mind to accept and challenge the precepts of sarcasm. Like humour, it requires the acceptance of a broad range of human foibles and eccentricities, and the ability to distinguish the truly important issues from the trivial. Oy yeah, I forgot, sarcasm is now about “bullying”… Yeah, I’m talking about you, Rudy.

  7. “Mr. Rotten, you’re damaging your credibility as a serious rock star when you swear on tv.”
    “Mr. Van Gogh, you’re damaging your credibility as a serious artist when you cut off your ear.”
    “Mr. Brando, you’re damaging your credibility as a serious actor when you mumble like that.”
    Multiply ad infinitum.

  8. Johnny E. is exactly what America needs for a President: a narcississtic poofter with a $400 bill from the beauty parlour who openly advises people as to how his tender tushy feels…
    Speaking of which, I don’t ride bikes anymore. I read somewhere that they can cause impotence…

  9. “Sometimes your blog reads like an episode of Beavis and Butthead.”
    Posted by: rudy espinoza at July 29, 2007 1:12 AM
    Heh Rudy,
    Er-r-r-r-r, could it possibly appear that way because there are so many Dems, and Liberals, and Daily Kos Kids, and Daily Kos Kid supporters that actually ACT like Beavis and Butthead? TALK like Beavis and Butthead? WRITE like Beavis and Butthead?
    Nah, couldn’t be that. Must be all made up.

  10. sar·casm (sär’kāz’əm) n.
    1. A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound.
    2. A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.
    ———–
    Yes you are such a nice kind person – the epitome of Christian love, kindness and charity.
    Those who intend to wound and hurt are generally not considered to be ‘good’ people. This post is vile.

  11. Yo Rudy! Is your butt a little sore right about now, just like J.E.’s? Just got kicked pretty good!

  12. I thought Leftdog’s definition was suspiciously leftoid (note the automatic victim in the definitions).
    So, from page 1790 of the Oxford International Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language (preferred by the right intellectuals 5 to 1), we have:
    Sarcasm. (1579) A sharp, bitter or cutting expression or remark; a bitter gibe or taunt.
    Note the real dictionary doesn’t assume a victim. Language is what it is. In more enlightened times language was used to communicate. It was expected that the recipient would respond appropriately, in kind, if necessary, hence the art of debate. Sarcasm doesn’t create victims, it creates discourse. Leftards create victims, because without victims they have no purpose to exist.

Navigation