Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
I don’t approve of brainwashing. Yet, there’s nothing like a good clean brain. I’m going to have to try it.
Having a dirty brain is more fun. So I’ve been told.
For some, a light rinse will suffice.
(One of the Democrats running for President in 1968 destroyed George Romney with that quip.)
Maybe I should settle for a light brushing and wipedown.
I guess, but these tactics (or apparent tactics) are so pervasive that almost any argument in any direction could be accused of employing at least some of them. It’s too broad of a brush.
I would have approached this from a different direction: What are the facts as we can best determine them, and what is the certainy of those facts?
After answering that question, we will often be left with considerable uncertainty, in which case we should say “Maybe, but not certain.” It’s not necessary to take a position every story.
Poppet, getting you to question everything is also a psychological operation — one that works really well. Uncertainty is a potential goal of a good psychological operation; there are further effects as well, but that’s one of the keystones.
As for the video: it gives some valuable information but isn’t going into the deep weeds of the thing, which it really can’t for reasons. Still, he didn’t give bad advice.
Watch out for that ‘questioning everything’ though: eventually it can drive you mad…which is you guessed it.
One of the curses of the internet is that it brings to the fore those who voice opinions with complete and absolute confidence — whether they have any basis for that confidence or not — and subordinates those that are honest and intelligent enough to admit when a situation is rife with uncertainty. Stating those three words “I don’t know” is taken as a weakness, when it should be recognized as a strength.
Indeed.
I put it to you that many psyops are staged, not to brainwash you, but to incite you into responding negatively. That way they’ll get a handle on who the potential troublemakers are.
AI is going to add another level of insanity.
Here’s a soundtrack if anyone’s planning to try it:
https://youtu.be/xF91-yrGjRg?si=Q9Y9Qc9xriPOz7RQ