35 Replies to “I, Napoleon”

  1. That effin retard would make an excellent Liberal Canadian and should be in a position of massive power over regulations and enforcement. If you disagree you are a racist bigoted fascist fagaphobe and should have your bank accounts seized.

  2. I’m pretty sure this woman is one of the reasons that they tried to make the word “retarded” unusable. It would make it more difficult to categorize her.

  3. The L’s
    The G’s
    The B’s
    The Queers
    and every other letter of the mutant alphabet is pushing this.

    It’s not just the T’s

    It’s about your subjugation.

    1. It’s about CHAOS which is believed necessary to hasten the arrival of utopia and which is why the Iranian nutters so desperately want the bomb.

      See the fear in her face. Were she to state the obvious — with which she assuredly agrees — BOOM, she’s out of a job. Only a tiny minority of people — even among the SDA community — will sacrifice a job for being on the wrong side of something this silly.

  4. From Monty Python The Life of Brian:
    JUDITH: Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
    LORETTA: I want to have babies.
    REG: You want to have babies?!
    LORETTA: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.
    REG: But… you can’t have babies.
    LORETTA: Don’t you oppress me.
    REG: I’m not oppressing you, Stan. You haven’t got a womb! Where’s the fetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!
    This used to be a joke.

    1. Surely that’s been deemed HATE speech by the UK … and any reposting of that sketch will land you in Federal pound-you-in-the-ass Prison – not ironically.

  5. This is a bureaucrat doggedly repeating the talking points she was given, not caring a single d@mn about the truth, Reality (TM) or the inevitable results of the policy she’s defending. She’s paid to act this way, nothing anyone can say will make her change unless the talking points are changed. And if the talking points do change, she will MERCILESSLY pitch her former darlings under the bus, without hesitation.

    It’s like that from the top where she is, all the way to the pink-haired git in the Department of Motor Vehicles saying you can’t renew your license because [reason].

    Which is why paying taxes to keep these sorts of people employed is a terrible mistake. They will always, always be like this.

  6. More about the Australian authority on potential pregnancy.

    Dr Cody has a PhD in Law from the University of New South Wales (UNSW), awarded with ‘excellence’, a Master’s in Law from Harvard University and a Bachelor of Arts and Law from UNSW.
    Dr Cody is passionate about improving gender equality in Australia and ensuring policy reflects the diverse needs of the community.
    Her priorities include:
    1) working to eliminate violence against women
    2) strengthening women’s economic security and opportunities in the workplace
    3) advocating for LGBTIQA+ rights.

    Appears this profile failed to pinpoint her goals of eliminating violence against trans women…, strengthening trans women’s economic security…..
    Advocating trans BS is incompatible with protecting women’s rights.

    1. “Advocating trans BS is incompatible with protecting women’s rights.”

      Yes indeed. But this is a bureaucrat speaking, and her carefully practiced line of patter there is GREAT for her personal career, just at the moment. The Truth is not relevant to her. She does not actually care about women, the law, the truth, or anything else, and you can see it in the weariness with which she addresses the question. “I don’t make the rules Senator, I just recite them on demand.”

      But let the political winds shift, and she will sit there and SWEAR that a man can never become a woman, and that she never said they could, and how dare you. For her career, of course.

      Demonic, as someone else said here.

  7. I don’t know if I just learned the difference between a woman and man, but I certainly just learned the difference between a woman and a mewling quim.

  8. 1) working to eliminate violence against women. Unless said violence Is performed for cultural practices I.E. Islam
    2) strengthening women’s economic security and opportunities in the workplace. Unless said opportunities go against the cultural practice that a woman cannot leave the house without a male family member I.E. Islam
    3) advocating for LGBTIQA+ rights. Unless It goes against the cultural practice of throwing said LGBTIQA+ members off the roof of buildings. I.E. Islam.

  9. didja get that straight faced response? that was rehearsed and ready to be summoned.

    utterly straight faced. a ‘trans’ woman is a full tilt 100% female fully capable of pregnancy . . . .
    but only according to words? 2 billion years of biology that came up with sexual reproduction gets
    SHOVED ASIDE ????? now its just ‘claim a thing to make it true’?
    as such, that poker face, flat, bland expression.
    deeply entrenched. deeply felt, practiced, locked on to. impervious to ANYTHING ELSE.

    1. my understanding tis all the prequel to The End Times when it will be impossible to track the number of occurrences and severity of up is down left is right black is white and especially
      right is wrong and wrong is right.
      that last one will permit all the rest. and it is now happening when praying in your head in
      good old rule britannia = arrested
      https://adfinternational.org/news/uk-christian-woman-criminally-charged-for-standing-silently-praying
      are cops your ‘friend’? hmmm? whaddaya think? ‘the good guys’ or, OR
      21st century GESTAPO.
      put yer hand up if you ‘silently pray’ a tq any time one of them is shot dead.

  10. One way people of the same ideology endear themselves to each other is by knowingly insisting that black is white and up is down. If someone is willing to deny reality in service to their politics, you know they are fully committed to the cause.

  11. Socialist.
    Socialism is a one-size-fits-all ideology.
    That’s it. Understand it. One-size-fits-all.
    This truth explains the success of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

Leave a Reply

Navigation