Ontario lawyers, under penalty of suspension, are now required to take a 6-hour Indigenous cultural training course called “The Path” which cites quotes from fake Indigenous person Thomas King
Ontario lawyers, under penalty of suspension, are now required to take a 6-hour Indigenous cultural training course called “The Path” which cites quotes from fake Indigenous person Thomas King
“Grow a f###ing pair otherwise this gets worse.”
BLOODY RIGHT there law ‘profession’ (or is that part ‘confession’ as in ‘confessing your sins’
to Big Brother?) you make a stand RIGHT NOW or it WILL get worse and STAY bad.
hint: hammer and hammer and HAMMER away at the fakery as the ‘cutting edge’ of your fierce UNRELENTING objection to such a galling ‘edict from on high’.
else be rightfully labelled as a collection of high profile chickenstihs. aka no middle ground here
You can’t just wear the red robe. You have to do the chant too. Ontario lawyers are at the forefront of the indigenous industry. Of course they have to take a course. To get the narrative straight.
Of course they are at the forefront. The indigenous industry is huge and makes lawyers rich. For example, in the energy industry (the REAL energy industry that is….you know, the one that actually produces reliable energy) in cases where the FN is involved (which is just about everywhere these days), the costs of both sides of the issue is paid for by that energy industry. It is a scam and a fraud of biblical proportions.
“Indigenous cultural training course”
Typical of Progs to believe that someone can be trained in culture.
Give those lawyers some free money and they’ll know what Injun culture really feels like.
maybe a six hour course in dealing blackjack
Shrug. They’ll all do it without a peep and piss on the handful of dissenters.
One lonely Cornwall lawyer with a backbone spoke out against the madness of the Wuhan flu repressions and his peers, to a peoplekind, abandoned him to the wolves.
https://www.standard-freeholder.com/news/local-news/cornwall-lawyer-gatien-announces-retirement-after-licence-suspended
How would anyone know if your land acknowledgement is “meaningful” as opposed to “performative”? Can these soothsayers tell the difference between fake and real tears?
This is great.
Certainly makes it plain to the victim,I mean client,just who your “Legal representative” is working for.
Voltaire was right.
They will commit atrocity,because they have accepted absurdity.
Is the proper Pronoun, “Death to the Covinators”?
“You will learn about the importance of storytelling”
Yes. Without a written language, stories are just merely stories. We must suspend all scepticism and accept the stories as gospel.
In our Indigenous training, they went through great lenghts to “prove” oral history, as relayed by native elders and knowledge keepers was flawless through the centuries. No exagerations, no loss of knowledge, no embellishment, etc. The goal was very obvious. Whatever land claims the indians have is absolutely valid and oral records of it are as reliable as any legal document. It’s the foundation of these land claims. And they know it.
So wouldn’t using fake quotes from a pseudo First Nations fakir be cultural appropriation? And without evidence, aren’t native “grave site” claims just hearsay and therefore not allowed in a normal court of law? Otherwise, they couldn’t they claim the entire country without any evidence to the contrary? And isn’t citing missing documents to prove Cowichan land claims the public school equivalent of “my dog ate my homework” and also not allowable under court rules because it is unsubstantiated? And what does it say about a culture that just makes stuff up, other than it must be a liar’s culture?
“It is not what I believe, it is what I can prove” Tom Cruise in “A Few Good Men”.
When the state monopolizes your “profession”, the governing body is more interested in protecting that monopoly than “professionalism”. The state is responsible for the grievance industry and having abandoned the elimination of the apartheid of the Indian Act under the proposed Trudeau-Chretien “white paper”, are now into reinforcement and inversion of apartheid and the greater cultural Marxist CRT, DEI, Gender pretense, land-back, and green theocracy pathologies of civilizational plunder. The “Guild Socialism” of state-granted right-to-practice monopolies is now a tool of economic and cultural repression. Lawyers are at the tip of that spear.
Having followed “Restore CSA” to its bitter end,are there any honest participants in the Ontario Legal system to stand up?
PS Knights legal battles were against a stacked deck.
A blatantly stacked deck,which did not even bother to hide its conflicts of interest and judge shopping.
Rules for thee.
None for we.
So this idiocy looks good on the Just Us System.
As they have abandoned due process and rule of law,why should we spare them a moments mercy?
Next?
All must sing the praises of Dear Leader ,while doing the Chicken Dance..
Before the Tribunal so rules…
Will our new nation of Buffalo,treat lawyers with the respect we owe them?
For part of the Collapse of Can Ahh Duh,has be the insanity of permitting lawyers to write laws.
Look to Ottawa to see what will happen,when failed at law lawyer seek power.
Or should we force all lawyers to run before a Bison Stampede,as part of an annual cull?
I like the optics of your last sentence. It brightens my whole day.
Makes perfect sense in the Lieberal Democratic Peoples Republic of Kanada. Wilful ignorance mandated by law.
Meh, we had to do some indigenous training at work too, I think it was about 4 hour’s worth. Online of course, it’s easier to mandate training online as it hides the real cost in lost man-hours. Of course there was no discussions of First Nations’ war against each other or their propensity for genocide and torture. Some of it was mildly interesting. The most important issue they took lots of pain to promote was that oral history is flawless. Elders train whomever is going to be the keeper of knowledge streneously, accepting no variation in any word, and the end result is that facts relayed through oral history are 100% true and have not been altered, exagerated or changed in any way. Of course any child who has played telephone or dealt with older adults’ memeories know it’s total B.S. But it is important to the narrative, especially land ownership issues. If the Injun say something, it’s always true.
I started taking a quick look this morning for the name of an Ontario lawyer that I had recently read about who had objected to this ‘course’ because (for one thing) it contained the same blatant misinformation about 215 ‘bodies’ being found as has been constantly pushed by the government, the news media and the residential school grievance industry. That’s all he wanted: that one fact corrected. Naturally they suspended him for it.
I never did find that particular case…the search engines seem to be deliberately hiding it. Instead, I got mostly results from native organizations about how bad denialism was and a few instances of lawyers being attacked, prosecuted or suspended for even questioning The Narrative in Ontario, Alberta and elsewhere.
(Rebel News (I think) was where I found the original story…I’ll have to go back and check).
But the most interesting thing, though, was this response from the Yandex AI:
“I can’t answer this request. My responses are designed to be safe, respectful, and compliant with ethical principles. You may ask another question.”
(and no, I didn’t ask for the AI version…this was just the response to a straight-up search query)
Ironic – six hours of indigenous cultural training on a colonizer’s internet and LMS.