Facing contempt of Congress, the Clintons’ lawyers made an untenable offer: that I travel to New York for a conversation with President Clinton only. No official transcript would be recorded and other Members of Congress would be barred from participating. I have rejected the Clintons’ ridiculous offer.
The Clintons’ latest demands make clear they believe their last name entitles them to special treatment. The House Oversight Committee’s bipartisan subpoenas require the Clintons to appear for depositions that are under oath and transcribed. Former President Clinton has a documented history of parsing language to evade questions, responded falsely under oath, and was impeached and suspended from the practice of law as a result.
The absence of an official transcript is an indefensible demand that is insulting to the American people who demand answers about Epstein’s crimes. As part of our investigation, the House Oversight Committee has released transcripts of interviews with former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and former U.S. Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, which has provided much needed transparency to the public. Without a formal record, Americans would be left to rely on competing accounts of what was said.
Former Secretary Clinton’s on-the-record testimony is necessary for the Committee’s investigation given her knowledge from her time as Secretary of State of the federal government’s work to counter international sex-tracking rings, her personal knowledge of Ms. Maxwell, and her family’s relationship with Mr. Epstein.
Contempt proceedings begin tomorrow.
28 flights on Epstein’s plane. Not surprising he’s doing everything he can to avoid testifying.
Can you imagine the unhinged violent screaming fits Bill must endure from that vile America-hating lesbian misandrist communist harpy?
She stood by her man during Lewinsky, and now he gets to pay for it.
I very much doubt that #Bubba ever enters the same room as the #harpy unless there are multiple witnesses present. He’s a lot of things but he’s not an idiot.
“Contempt proceedings begin tomorrow.”
Uh huh. Somebody wake me when #Bill&Hill do the perp-walk in prison orange. I remain cynical, and doubt that anything will ever touch these people. The fix, as they say, is in.
The strategy, and I stress this in a most subjective (aka talking out my prosterior kinda way) that it’s only theoretical, is to get someone to play the rat.
Would Bubba rat out to save his own skin?
What about the hag?
Is she beneath walking over a corpse to evade accountability?
How about four dead bodies in Benghazi?
And what if those that suspect she might?
Would they attempt to preempt her or Bill from sacrificing them?
Every *cough* *cough* “institution” in America declared that the 2020 election was the freest and fairest election in the HISTORY of the US … including AG fatso Barr. The SCOTUS refused to hear a single case of 2020 election fraud.
When every single one of our “institutions” pretend an alternate reality … I don’t expect the Clinton’s comfy home to be RAIDED at 5:00 am with Fox News cameras tipped off. The Clintons aren’t going anywhere … because “institutions” or something.
Quick question:
What’s the purpose of this congressional investigation into Epstein Island and Clinton’s participation there?
(IOW, how is this something that elected representatives should be spending their time doing? Law Enforcement….sure. Intelligence community relative to potential extortion and/or compromising security….absolutely. Law enforcement internal affairs, and DOJ inspectors general….yes. But, what is the purpose outside of partisan politics to pursue this in this fashion?)
Thus far … not a single ‘John’s’ name has been named … nor a single CRIMINAL case has been brought against the ACTUAL alleged underage “victims” of Epstein’s … sex trafficking or something.
What actual physical SEX CRIMES (statutory rape, or just plain old rape) have been prosecuted? Answer: None.
Eventually, the House Committee will turn its attention to Zorro Ranch in New Mexico. Epstein purchased the ranch in 1993.
Epstein files released Friday include Zorro Ranch images | Local News | santafenewmexican.com
https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/epstein-files-released-friday-include-zorro-ranch-images/article_9bcf492c-b178-4fff-af79-570fd4e21e02.html
New Mexican officials are also planning to investigate Zorro Ranch as victims have stated that they were exploited there as well as the island and NYC townhouse. Supposedly the entire Clinton family “vacationed” at Zorro Ranch.
“Victims”? “Exploited”? Exploited? What? They agreed to get paid $1,000/sex act but only got $800?
More square black boxes that pass for evidence?
Photos of Epstein with Irish wolfhounds or something?
I can’t wait for the NM trials.
PS … it appears as though NM has made a mess of the Timothy Busfield ACCUSATIONS… looks like some boys mommies were just looking for a payday.
Please note … FALSE rape or child diddling charges do more to undermine REAL cases of child diddling than anything else.
Yes, “victims” and “exploited” until Maxwell’s conviction is overturned.
Considering that Bill Clinton’s creepy side has been on public display for decades, I’m not shocked that he would have hung around with Epstein as much as he did. But how does this square with the oft repeated claim that the Epstein files are a hoax?
Hoax? Suffice to say accusations are not proof of anything. Show me the CRIMINAL cases against the actual men (or women, Hillary) who actually sexually assaulted little girls … and I’ll change my mind. We live in a land of PROOF, EVIDENCE, and due process. Thus far … I’ve SEEN nothing of the sort.
You also live in a land that didn’t rebel against the lawfare against Trump and his allies, and anybody the else the Dems and their allies target, abetted by a corrupt FBI, and presided over by corrupt judges in a corrupt judicial system.
There is a difference between the ideal and what actually happens.
Feminists have pronounced, in the wake of various Clinton shenanigans, that you are allowed one squeeze of the charmin. It’s like asking for permission. THEN if she says no, it means maybe.
“Sexual harassment” … by definition is when a man initiates sex with a subordinate. What is possibly more subordinate than EVERYONE below (sorry) the POTUS?
For example … PM Carney is a subordinate of Trump’s.