22 Replies to “Recovering From Injuries”

  1. This issue came up at our local senior coffee. Everyone but me thought the agent should be charged with murder and when I offered a different opinion I literally got shouted down. It then went Trump, I hate Trump, Trump is evil.

    Elbows up folks. Bet CBC won’t report that!

    1. I have an acquaintance that won’t watch any of the videos of the event, but parrots the Leftist narrative that it was unjustified murder and not a defensive shooting.

      I think he won’t watch the videos because then he might have to admit or even consider the possibility that his narrative is wrong.

  2. Internal bleeding? is that what we used to call a bruise?
    Don’t like BS spin no matter who delivers it, and yes, it looks like a justifiable shooting from videos I have seen.

    1. It’s entirely possible to have internal bleeding that doesn’t need surgery and repairs itself that is more serious than a bruise.

    2. @Martimer: No, not justified. A bullet to the head for shifting her car around? Yes, she was being stupid (perhaps caused by nervousness) but he didn’t need to shoot her, it’s not like she was speeding down a street at 60mph aiming at ICE agents.

      1. And gunning the motor while the wheels spin on the ice on the road doesn’t show intent? The ICE officer would probably be dead if she had good traction when she “tried to get away”.

        1. What I see in the videos is that the ICE officer rapidly pushed his feet back, causing him to lean-into the hood of the car with his legs back. He probably did this in response to hearing Ms. Good rev her engine and move forward slightly (or simply stop reversing). If he had not done this before she had started speeding forward … he probably would have been run over by her left front tire and killed if he didn’t have that microsecond to react.

          And I want to remind everyone that the automobile wasn’t a Tesla in robot drive mode. No, Ms. Good (the new lesbian) deliberately put the car shifter in reverse. Then she put it in drive, and then she punched the accelerator. SHE took all those actions and is responsible for trying to flee the scene with an Agent in front of her car. Her deliberate actions. Her fault.

      2. Yeah, knew you couldn’t help spilling your bleeding heart.
        Feelings aren’t Facts.
        A vehicle is a deadly weapon, lethal force justified.
        Try and think what would happen if every vehicle could be used in this way, without defensive measures.
        Dead cops. That make ya happy, Lib t a r d?

      3. What’s the matter? Did your sacred cow get gored? Did an inviolable white liberal woman (from the rainbow community no less) finally receive consequences?

        People here may challenge this, but think about it: a large chunk of society (especially white liberal women, especially them) has operated from the idea that a white woman can get away with, heh, murder. And the responses to this cult riddled commie catching consequences has been to reinforce that notion. That third rail has been touched; that bubble has now been popped. Consider what that means going forward — we’re already seeing the reaction: now the dumb…ladies…are bringing their babies to use as human shields; they doubled down but brought ‘protection’.

      4. Entirely justified, you a$$wipe. Plus, as a bonus, the agent removed a piece of trash from this planet. Win-win situation. Now go peddle your utter BS on rabble or another such place for whiny garbage

  3. So?
    The interfering nitwit tried to commit vehicular homicide and died.
    The victim cured her of such tendencies.
    Her partner should be charged as aiding and abetting,as it can be clearly heard agitating and encouraging the attempted crime..
    And stripped of all money raised on Go Fund Me,as that is profit,from a crime.
    That she,the driver,managed to actually harm her victim,does nothing to change her crime.

  4. But, but, but … wait! … what!? We don’t even know who any of those ICE stormtroopers are! They’re all masked and don’t wear ID tags. They’re anonymous thugs! That’s why Ms. Good refused to open her door and exit her vehicle as demanded by these anonymous thugs. They’re all unknown. She was “scared”.

    Of course this is utter equine droppings crapped out by the leftist agitprop’ers. They have a constitutional right to face their accuser in court … if they feel the need to fight their court cases in the criminal charges against them … then you’ll get the officers badge numbers. In the meantime … get OUT of the damn car, and don’t resist arrest.

  5. Nothing sets off the BS meter more than going out of one’s way to mention “33” stitches.

    1. Ah, you’re a special kind of stupid aren’t you? Kind of like these idiot protesters and Walz.
      The stitches were from an earlier incident where another dunce tried to run the ICE agent down and kill him.

    2. So which occult symbolism was it?
      Freemasons (always a good if old fashioned, stuffy pick)
      Illuminati (definitely the selection if you want to go really spooky although it’s getting up there with Freemasonry)
      Star of David (it be da Joooos!)
      I Love You (conspiracy for the hip youth of the digital age)M
      Maybe it has something to do with the Catholics; Jesus was 33; 33 buttons on a bishop’s cassock (it be da Jesuits!)

      You at least owe it to the reading audience to pick one and go with it.

      1. Freemasons actually exist, so I’ll go with them. Freemasons were and are responsible for pushing fictions – fictions in science (viruses, dinosaurs, evolution, space, etc.), fictions in history (most things before 1800), fictions in religion (they are close cousins to the Jesuits – religion is their focus), and so on.

        Freemasons leave clues when they are involved in something through hand symbols, numbers, and symbols. It is a “tell” for other “illuminated” freemasons to see.

        Once you train yourself to spot them, you can start to distinguish news events from false flags and manufactured events.

        Like this one.

Navigation