Where the foxes caper unmolested, the government packs your school lunch and the sun never sets on the Censorship Industrial-Complex Empire.
Very early into the COVID-19 pandemic, ZeroHedge suggested that a little-known Chinese lab in Wuhan might know something about the novel coronavirus sweeping the globe. As a result, and as you know, we were subject to an intense demonetization / deplatforming campaign that included getting kicked off of Twitter, PayPal, Facebook and other platforms, dropped by our advertisers, and targeted by MSM hit pieces which colluded with foreign ‘watchdogs’ to inflict maximum damage.
These same groups also targeted outlets including The Federalist and Breitbart over various reporting, which suffered similar fates.
Now, thanks to a new book by investigative journalist Paul Holden that builds on reporting by Matt Taibbi, Paul Thacker and others, we learn that the origin of these campaigns, launched years before the pandemic, was none other than UK Prime Minister Kier Starmer’s political machine, which began targeting left-wing outlets speaking critically of Starmer such as The Canary, and then went after conservative outlets in America – just in time for the 2020 US election.
A regime change in the UK would work. Why are we messing around in Venezuela and everywhere else when Europe needs liberation?
— Cernovich (@Cernovich) December 5, 2025
Wait, wasn’t Boris Johnson prime minister in 2020?
Hang. Them. All.
Someone should tell Cernovich we already did twice, and it didn’t take.
I really dislike Mike Cernovich for various reasons. Hypocrisy is one of those reasons. He was really wound up about the US dropping bombs in Syria in retaliation for the perception that Assad was using chemical weapons in that country. Cernovich insisted that it was a set-up to get the US wrapped up in a regime change.
And yet, here he is lobbying for the US to get involved in a “regime change” in the UK for much more vague reasons. It’s not our job to babysit self-destructive countries. And, I don’t think he fully grasps the direct and indirect damage Venezuela is purposefully attempting to do the the US. What is public knowledge now in that regard is likely only a tiny fraction of what they are doing. There are certain US states along the southern border that seem to be influenced by outside sources financially. There is no other way to explain the behavior of so many law enforcement, judicial and election officials in states such as Arizona and New Mexico.
I took his comment as mostly tongue in cheek. But yeah … Britain and most of Europe desperately need regime change. Fortunately … that can be mostly-peacefully done at the ballot box. Britain dumped the UniParty Tories on their pathetic asses because they betrayed their voters. Hopefully the Reform Party takes charge and flushes out the Labor leftists.
“Fortunately … that can be mostly-peacefully done at the ballot box.”
Kenji, you don’t understand Euro elections, where nothing of substance changes election after election because the left has a stranglehold on all institutions and the electoral process as well.
In certain countries rightish anti-immigration politicians are often pre-emptively banned from running , or their parties are prevented from forming the government even though they got a higher proportion of votes and parliamentary seats.
That’s because the other half dozen of so leftist and centrists parties always form a coalition to maintain the reins of power.
A lot of electoral fraud also occurs, fraud that’s never investigated or corrected.
Finally, the next election in the UK is not due for another fours years, by which time there could be no reversing course because the country is too far gone.
And if fraud and/or a coalition doesn’t do the trick, there’s always the courts to rule that the “far right” candidate is disqualified for some BS reason or other.
I don’t think Europe or the UK has the balls to fine X for not imposing their censorship in foreign countries.
more worried for the UK and their new plan to not have juries for trials for sentences of less than 3 years.
You sound as though you don’t trust the powdered wigs? Surely they’re all legal scholars who will protect the fundamental rights of the native population? Nevermind.
I don’t think it’s possible for them to look like greater tarts than they do, and to respond directly, no I don’t trust the lot either.
They are just expanding “Summary offences” which also exist in Canada (max penalty 2 years less a day, up to $5000 fine, or both), and it wouldn’t surprise me if Canada follows suit.
There also have been occasions where the judge has decided to dismiss the jury, and proceed with a Judge only trial for an indictable offense, for example: R. v. McLeod et al. the judge decided after a mistrial replacing the first jury to discard the second jury, and continue as a Judge only trial.
JD Vance doesn’t stutter. I’m with Elon. Vance 2028 & 2032
European regulators want U.S. speech controlled by E.U. law
https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1996919026597941692
“ International bodies now expect enforcement against U.S. citizens “
So I should stop emailing all these local UK apparatchiks when they arrest their citizens for criticizing troons, muzzies, Bolsheviks? Come and get me ya filthy commies!