105 Replies to “These Are The New Rules”

  1. So long as people express their views outside of the office in their own time using their own resources, and do not in any way bring their place of employment into it, it’s probably a bad idea to fire people for political beliefs, even abhorent ones. The only exception should perhaps be where the person is a high-ranking company official who’s inextricably linked to the company in the public’s mind.

    Can a country where your employer can punish you for your political views really be said to have freedom of speech and conscience?

    1. But those are the new rules. By the way, many of those employers have HIRED people because of their political views. Run along now….isn’t it time for your 10th booster?

        1. “Yeah, but you might not like the new rules when you discover it cuts both ways.”

          The New Rules are the rules because this is what the Lefties insisted on. We’ve all been getting cut by this since Ronald Regan was President, and it only ever keeps getting worse. Reasoned debate? No, they’re not allowing it. They’re literally beating people with the wrong hat on. They freaking burned down Minneapolis during a fake pestilence.

          So now, finally, they kill a guy for having an opinion in a way that even the Normies can’t ignore, and you’re worried some of those frothing lunatics might lose their job?

          Dude, they are -all- gonna lose their jobs. If you’ve got pronouns on your social media and you’re speaking ill of the deceased, you’re done. Stick a fork in ’em.

        2. It already cut the other way. Do you know how many people in academia have been blackballed or forced underground due to their personal beliefs/views in the last few decades? How many people have the left doxxed and gotten fired due to their political beliefs in just the last decade? How many people have gotten swatted, assaulted, harassed, threatened, just plain ostracized or called “nazi/deplorable/et al” ad nauseum?

          Sorry muffin, but this has been going on for a while now — pendulum is just swinging the other way. It was going to happen; it isn’t like the left wasn’t warned, frequently, using the very words you just typed.

          And now, a lot of people just don’t care to listen to any complaints due to what I just typed. A lot of people just aren’t going to care what happens anymore. The left made the big mistake of alienating people who just wanted to be left alone; the people who would have protected their rights even if they disagreed with them; oh well.

          1. Yes, I’m very aware. That’s one of the principal reasons I’m not fond of the rules. If conservatives start forcing out employees with abhorent views, it cripples their efforts to insist that universities not punish or disfavour those with the “wrong” political views.

          2. and there yas have it. according to km, right when the pendulum starts swinging ‘tother way, its HALT!! ze rdddulezz frum peefore doan happly nowe.
            how convenient.

          3. Bugger off with the personal attacks, kritter. I’ve spent far more hours railing against intolerant university monocultures than you ever will.

          4. The Democrat “judiciary” (i.e., the Democrat Volksgerichtshof) rules against Trump, but the real judges almost always rule in his favor…..because they are the adults in the room….with the exception of Brown Jackson who shouldn’t even be a law clerk yet alone sit on SCOTUS

        3. Are you familiar with the name Jordan Peterson?
          Do you know why he isn’t a University of Toronto Professor anymore?
          The Progs tried to compel his speech.
          They didn’t want to allow him to call people with mental illness by their actual inborn gender pronouns.

          Progs were already forcing us to live by their rules.
          It’s time that we made them to live by their rules.
          What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
          Turnabout is fair play.

          1. Turnabout is the strategy of a child. An adult looks more than one move down the chessboard (i.e., where a conservative is the target), and tries to stop all such behaviour.

          2. Speaking of that turnabout strategy … it’s what the black radicals have been doing since Obama. They’re trying to “get even” … not equal. They don’t want equality … they want retribution. Same with the Indigenous … give us our land back (but we’ll take $B’s in in-lieu payments too). Same with the Muslims … smash the Crusaders.

            That’s ALL the left ever does.

            Oh … and not knowing who she is … I had to look her up. Yeah, I coulda guessed.

            https://i.cbc.ca/1.5416818.1646077970!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_1180/manitoba-mla-nahanni-fontaine.jpg

          3. Turnabout is what vicious retards deserve.
            It isn’t a strategy, it’s justice.
            Stupid should hurt. I’d fire them for their weapons grade stupidity.

            Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky
            Rule #4 Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules

          4. Oz:

            So your politics is about delivering justice to your political opponents, smiting them with a mighty smite.

            Okay. I try to make mine about improving society, and part of that is not adopting the more repugnant strategies of my political opponents. All adopting these strategies does is normalize them, giving them a stamp of approval. That’s not improving society.

            Further, I doubt these strategies endear whoever adopts them to most voters. They don’t care about your vendetta against your political enemies.

          5. “So your politics is about delivering justice to your political opponents, smiting them with a mighty smite.”

            NO. Wrong. Stop trying to reduce my speech to a puerile strawman argument.

            “I try to make mine about improving society,”

            There is no peace without justice.

            “All adopting these strategies does is normalize them, giving them a stamp of approval”

            Maybe in your fevered imagination.
            In WWII the Allies carpeted bombed the Axis because the Axis did it first.
            Did the strategies used to defeat the Axis “normalize” carpet bombing and other horrible acts of war?
            No.
            After the war was over, AFTER the enemy was defeated, AFTER the enemy sued for peace we went back to normal behaviour.
            There were trials and many of the enemy were hanged.
            We got some justice. Some.

          6. Oz:

            Fine. Adopt the worst tactics of your political opponents. But don’t think you’re better then them, and don’t be surprized if the voters despise all of you.

          7. “Adopt the worst tactics of your political opponents.”

            Have I assassinated an important political speaker? No.
            Have I rioted, burned shops or looted? No.
            I have not adopted the worst tactics(I thought we were talking strategy earlier, there is a big difference).

            Again you resort to a strawman argument.
            How can you improve society, as you claim, with continuous falsehoods?
            I am better than them and certainly better than you.

          8. KM. there is nothing necessarily repugnant or wrong about vengeance or vendettas.

            Heard a story once about a gal who was raped and afterwords she and a couple of males friends tracked the culprit down.

            While they held him on the ground she cut off his balls.

            Man, I love a story with a happy ending.

          9. LS:

            Just retribution is one of the the foundations of the justice system. But mob rule and cancel culture aren’t. They usually end up dolng more harm than good, particularly when people are punishing others for abhorent opinions.

          10. KM, the thing is I don’t care about your squishy opinions.

            Save them for your Wimps Anonymous meetings.

          11. Oz:

            You think politics is about punishing your enemies. The voters think politics is about helping the people, and they don’t give a crap about your vendettas.

        4. That’s funny….given that the “new rules” were created by the lunatic left. Enjoy it….you deserve it.

          1. Not so sure about that in the US. Getting people with repugnant political views fired and blacklisted is often referred to as McCarthyism.

            And it dates back as far as the American Revolution, where loyalists were driven out of the US after the War of Independence was over, even though they were of no real threat.

            There’s plenty of blame to go around on all sides.

          2. “Getting people with repugnant political views fired and blacklisted is often referred to as McCarthyism.”

            Yes, you Progs do refer to that era as McCarthyism.
            McCarthy was right, by the way.
            They found people doing janitorial work in the Pentagon who were card carrying communists.
            They fired them.

          3. “McCarthy was right, by the way.”

            McCarthy got people like Reed Harris fired and blacklisted for the most tenuous of reasons (e.g., had Marxist sympathies in college), and ultimately the American people rejected McCarthy. So whether you think McCarthy was justified or not, it was not a politically successful strategy.

            At any rate, it establishes my point. Political witch hunts are not a solely left-wing strategy.

        5. I’m assuming your comment is directed at most SDA regulars, correct?

          If so, then I need to ask if you’re being deliberately obtuse? The Rules of the Game for many decades now have been: “Cancel anyone who dares disagree with the Leftist Mindset of the Day.” Even if you were a loyal Leftist, but suddenly stepped out of line, then you would be canceled.

          FINALLY, the Leftist mouthpieces, who thought they were immune from what we’ll call the Old Rules, are quickly finding out that New Rules are in place.

          2. The US State Department just announced they would CANCEL the Visas of anyone celebrating Charlie’s cold blooded assassination.

            Good. I voted for this.

            It’s about time. It’s a privilege to be in America. We just canceled your privilege.

          3. Trump’s initiative will probably be as successful as his previous initiative to remove all visa students voicing anti-American sentiments.

            Which is to say, not very. The whole thing has been bound up in red tape and legal challenges, so that no students have been legally deported. There were 2000 visa recovations, still far short of what the Trump administration was aiming for.

            It probably did convince many visa students to stop talking about politics (no matter what their leanings), which is either a success or a failure depending on your point of view.

          4. Yes, Lawfare delays the implementation of FULLY LEGAL Trump Admin. policies. So we have to wait till the SCOTUS does their job and kneecap the Lawfare.

          6. “I’m assuming your comment is directed at most SDA regulars, correct?

            If so, then I need to ask if you’re being deliberately obtuse? ”

            You already know the answer to that question, Robert….as does every other regular poster here.

        7. It generally cut towards right-wingers from the beginning. So seeing leftists get it gives a degree of smug satisfaction. Unfortunately, this is where we’re at. Getting back to “We’re adults. We can disagree and still be friends.” will take a lot of work.

        8. It’s all fun and games until an unhinged leftist loses THEIR job.
          The empathy they displayed is the empathy they deserve: “Don’t let the pendulum hit you on the a** on your way out”.

          1. It’s not about empathy. It’s about it being a crappy idea which will achieve nothing truly useful, and which helps normalize the idea that politics is all about punishing those who disagree with you.

            Voters’ respect for politicians and politics is generally poor. Perhaps focusing on the real issues rather than going on vendettas would help.

        9. These rules have cut 1-way – the rabid Left’s – for years; why do 99% of us here post anonymously with VPNs? Looks like that includes you, KM, so you are also playing by the Left’s rules.

          Every leftist scumbag would walk over hot coals to see us fired from our jobs, doxxed in public and our homes protested and families harassed for exercising our free speech. Don’t pretend we are at their level when we shove the bully’s nose in the dogshït pile to get him to stop doing it to others. WE aren’t the ones assassinating our opponents. Trying to fight by Queensbury rules with the d-bag Left is delusional as they have no honour and we just self-immolate feeling pious about how “principled” we are.

          Where has that got us? As I read recently, “I’d rather be thought racist but alive than not thought racist and dead”

          But, hey. Maybe we are on the wrong side here, KM, and you are on the side of the angels. So why not start posting with your real name? No BS here, I’d tip my hat at such a ballsy move and truly wish you well.

          mhb23re

    2. “Can a country where your employer can punish you for your political views really be said to have freedom of speech and conscience?”

      First of all, celebrating someone’s death isn’t so much expressing ‘political views’ as it is revealing yourself to be a heartless, despicable person (we weren’t talking about a serial killer or Hitler here).

      Secondly, when an employer is suddenly deluged by calls and emails threatening to boycott their business because of their employment of that heartless, despicable person then YES, that’s a problem for the business that can only be solved one way. Free speech is not consequence-free speech.

      1. Yeah, I hear that argument a lot. “It’s not really expressing political views because I find it so loathsome.”

        And I did make the exception of people who were high-ranking and represented the “face” of the company.

        But what are people doing threatening to boycott a company because there’s an employee who they hate? Put down the torches and pitchforks. At any rate, if the company has any brains they’ll recognize that the “mob” is probably just a few people, and will blow over in short order. 99.999% of their customers probably won’t even be aware.

        2. “But what are people doing threatening to boycott a company because there’s an employee who they hate?”

          We’re doing what the Lefties have been doing since Regan was President. We’re putting them the f- out of business. It isn’t like they haven’t been asking for it. Or begging, really.

          “At any rate, if the company has any brains they’ll recognize that the “mob” is probably just a few people, and will blow over in short order.”

          Bud Lite. Jaguar. Harley Davidson. Tractor Supply. Target stores.

          Go check out Asmongold’s video from last night. He took some more time away from family crisis to put together a nice little montage of game companies with employees talking sh1t about the deceased. This is a reasonable and appropriate action to take. Said employees are FINDING OUT this morning that is is very not okay to sh00t a guy for having an opinion you don’t like, and the rest of us out here in consumer-land are going to make sure they know that in the only way currently open to us.

          See, the problem, my dear mammal, is that these people have been told, and believe, that it -is- okay to un-alive those who disagree. We can’t be in the came space with them, it isn’t possible. So they either learn the easy way, by job loss, or they learn the -other- way.

          1. And Phantom … let me repeat … ad nauseum … that “Hate Crime Laws” are what enable … LEGALLY enable … the cancellation of “wrong-thinkers” … and if that cancellation is the ULTIMATE cancellation? Mission accomplished.

        3. ” 99.999% of their customers probably won’t even be aware.”

          Making everyone aware is not only our job, our survival is dependent upon it.

          2. Yes, it really is.
            It’s what blogs etc. are all about.
            I know this because I’ve been kicking Prog butt on them since the late ’90s when I had another nic on Canoe.

          1. First, that’s a reaction against the OWNER of the company, not a run-of-the-mill employee.

            Second, all that campaign did was show how pathetic and criminal Musk’s opponents were. Why would conservatives want to follow suit?

    3. Seen lots of them that have their job title and employer in their bios. Lots working in schools, health care and government.

          1. DeVRyerson. Bah. They showed their hand 35 years ago when they imported boatloads of “Ph.Ds” to their “engineering” program and provide cover to be admitted to the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario.

    4. When you cheer on political assassination, your employer may decide that you aren’t worth the potential trouble that may come from keeping you around.
      It tends to cause a backlash that they might be affected by, could cause issues int the workplace, could cause a business to get boycotted, etc. Most companies don’t want to deal with that smoke, and there is definitely smoke with this one.

      In short, yes, you have freedom of speech, but you also have the right to experience consequences.
      And the left has been very adamant about people who disagree with them experiencing consequences for quite some time. Sucks when the shoe is on the other foot, don’t it boss?

      1. People like that are bad hires. If they are willing to insult a customer who generates the revenue that supports the business and makes their job possible, how badly are they willing to treat their colleagues?

    5. Have you had your head up your ass for the last fifteen years or what?

      Don’t answer that, it’s a rhetorical question and we all know the answer.

      The left has been cancelling people for having moderate political opinions for at least that long. Have you heard of the term “cancel culture”, or are you still pretending to be stupid?

      The right is finally hammering the left with the Prisoner’s Dilemma and God willing will keep up the pressure until they come crawling back in tears, begging for a return to the rules we always preferred. And no number of disingenuous air-sniffing concern trolls will dissuade us.

      These are the new rules. If you don’t like them, then they’re aimed at you.

      1. “And no number of disingenuous air-sniffing concern trolls will dissuade us.”

        Pretty much can’t allow them to continue, Daniel. They either turn from this path or everything becomes very difficult for everybody. As in ‘there’s no food in the store this week because the trucks can’t get through’ type of difficult.

      2. Holy crap, are you thick.

        I am fully aware that the left has been cancelling people for a long time. I never said different. That you think I did shows you can’t be bothered to read what was said.

        I’m arguing that cancel culture sucks no matter who does it, and that conservatives would be damn fools to emulate it.

        1. Foolish? Probably. Inevitable given the ridiculous behavior off the left? Definitely.

          “It’s childish.”….no, it’s tribalism, and the left has been pushing tribalism for quite some time. Well, genie is out of the bottle, good luck putting it back in. Hint: probably going to take some very extreme actions to do so.

          Professionally, I am against it; I’m all for bottling up divisive sentiments no matter where they originate. Personally though….as a person who has been on the receiving end of the left’s abject denial of simple common sense…I don’t care anymore. I know what you could wind up confronting; have fun.

          1. Both sides are now highly tribalistic. Neither side has a monopoly on it.

            So much so that politics now seems more about punishing one’s enemies than helping the voters.

        2. Really?
          Maybe you just cannot express yourself very well then.
          But we be thick for not reading your “superior” mind?
          For what I read in your comments,was the traditional RINO response:
          Of surrender before you fight back.
          “Cause we are better than that”.
          No we are not.
          Except most of us do not insist that we have the right to treat other persons as our property..Unlike your Progressive Comrades who infest most of our government funded institutions.

          Our Statist Friends have always had the choice,leave us alone.
          or continue to threaten,nudge,manipulate and reap what they sow.
          And now that the threat of harvest rises??
          Now you think this is a bad thing?

          2. Math is hard.
            When assassinations of those whose politics is considered disagreeable is solely committed by leftists, KM chimes in with “Neither side has a monopoly on it.”

          3. roaddog:

            You know damn well I was referring to cancel culture, not assassination. I see increasing intolerance for even mild deviation from doctrine amongst the right. I see it in this very thread. The voices are getting more strident and less forgiving by the day, even towards those who mostly agree with their politics. I won’t call them conservatives, because they are not. I don’t know what they are.

            And if it continues, it will rip the right apart, just as it’s doing to the left.

        3. “I’m arguing that cancel culture sucks no matter who does it, and that conservatives would be damn fools to emulate it.”

          And the fact that you only became concerned with this after it stopped exclusively targeting Conservatives and started targeting Liberals is just totally coincidental, right? Because you’re always so scrupulously fair and non-partisan and not a left-wing CONCERN TROLL at all?

          1. bingo. thus my comment aimed at the resident ‘something’ regarding their reaction when the pendulum swing back.

        4. ”I’m arguing that cancel culture sucks no matter who does it, and that conservatives would be damn fools to emulate it”

          I think you are showing Jedi-level naïveté here. We may have to stoop to the Left’s level to get them to cease and desist with their BS. The line of Mutually Assured Destruction that supposedly held people in check in their public discourse – namely that jobs would not be lost and families publicly harassed by one’s exercising free speech – was long since obliterated by the Left. Why is it rational to think they’ll stop this behaviour unless they’re exposed to the pointy end of the stick?

          1. again agreed. we must use the leftoidals dialect to get the point across.
            they are after all, brain damaged and limited in intellect. use stuff theyre familiar with mebbe then they get the ‘connection’.

    6. I actually agree with that.

      How about the way the unvaccinated were treated? Should a person be required to prove their private medical choices and be excoriated, discriminated and fired over those?

    8. Respectfully, celebrating or implying justification of a murder should not be classified as a political belief. It has to do with character and humanity, not politics.

      1. Well it really doesn’t matter how you categorize it. The argument for freedom of speech remains.

    9. Have had that in the UK for years. You cannot be a member of certain groups (usually those on ‘the right’) and be a school teacher or Police Officer, in particular.
      This is from a law firm in the UK:
      “It is generally advisable for employees to be cautious about expressing political views at work and on social media, as this could land them in hot water with disciplinary action and ultimately dismissal. Whilst UK employment law provides some protection for employees who want to express their beliefs and opinions, these protections are by no means guaranteed and will only apply when very specific legal thresholds are met”.

      ‘Sir’ Keir Starmer “we have free speech in the UK and have had for a very long time”…….

  3. CBC brought in an “expert” who said Charlie Kirk called for the execution of gays, which he did not. The left must be made to face up to the hatred they caused. CBC hosted Barbara Perry, a self-described “hate expert,” who made false claims during a broadcast, stating that Charlie Kirk called for queer people to be “executed” and labeled them “defective and dangerous”. However, there is no record of Kirk making such statements.

    1. The retard Stephen King posted Charlie advocated for stoning gays to death, he later apologized realizing it never happened. I expect nothing from the CBC. But this is how it works, some one told me he’s a Nazi so he’s a Nazi.

      1. Stephen King has apologized. Apologized several times right after Senator Mike Lee (R), Utah suggested filing a lawsuit on behalf of Charlie’s children. Stephen King has deep pockets. Too bad Stephen, screenshots already captured.

        1. Ted Cruz eviscerated king on X.

          I used to enjoy king’s work and read all of novels until the 90s. I will never pay one thin dime to purchase any written work or see any cinematic work from this loathsome piece of trash. I was pretty much there due to his idiotic public rants on gun control and now it’s certain.

          mhb23re

    2. The pushback to the false statement that Kirk called for the execution of gays is simple…..Kirk wasn’t a Muslim.

    3. Perry is a c*nt.
      The Canadian Anti-Hate Network use her bullshit to push forth their agenda of cleansing Canada of white Christian men.

    4. His estate should sue both the CBC and the so called “Expert” for defamation, $200 million each to start.

      1. And why not? These comments were directly defamatory and not just public outright stupidity that’s costing Alex Jones a BILLION dollars, the most ridiculous abortion of an “award” in the history of the US.

        And before some concern troll chimes in, I think jones was an idiot for saying Sandy Hook was a conspiracy. What he DIDN’T say was that the children and their families deserved what happened.

  4. The idea of the new rules is the recognition that the rules for “good” behaviour had been modified to reflect the newly accepted opinion.
    They were deemed rules to infer that everyone should follow them.
    The best explanation of the slippery slope in all of this is a line from A Man For All Seasons

    “If I cut down all the laws to catch up the devil, what protection will I have when he turns on me?”

  5. Old adage:

    “Better to remain silent and be thought an idiot…
    Than to speak, and remove all doubt.”

  6. “The idea of the new rules is the recognition that the rules for “good” behaviour had been modified to reflect the newly accepted opinion.”

    That may be what you recognize, joseph.
    I say we’re at war and we may use the enemy’s tactics against the enemy until he is defeated.
    When we win and the enemy is soundly defeated, then we return to the rules of the civil society that we created and that the enemy attempted to destroy.

    1. Concur, the war was started by those that decided to change the rules.
      They decided there was an evil that justified dispensing with due process and going for outlawing ideas that made them responsible for their bad decisions.
      But when they knocked down all the protections to get after those they disagree with, they nullified any protections that keep them from suffering the same fate as the people they have been attacking.
      They changed the rules, so they can’t complain when they get penalized for breaking them.

      1. “But when they knocked down all the protections to get after those they disagree with, they nullified any protections that keep them from suffering the same fate as the people they have been attacking.”

        Absolutely, Joseph. I’m all for banning lawfare and going back to the days when politicians didn’t deliberately use the powers of government to destroy their political opponents. Let’s do that, *immediately after* we make the Democrats pay for the 2020 election fraud and the frivolous impeachments and criminal charges they attempted to use against Donald Trump.

      2. ”But when they knocked down all the protections to get after those they disagree with, they nullified any protections that keep them from suffering the same fate as the people they have been attacking”

        Brilliantly well-said and to me, the best comment of the entire thread. Well done, Joseph.

  8. Nahanni has lighter eyes than I do. Very “pale face”, too. Is she a sort of Betty “Fauxcahontas” Buckskin? I think we should be told.

  9. For me, the Left has used ‘their rules’ to gain/solidify power and codify things like gender madness and the dead end that is DEI.
    I’d bet – and I’m not a betting man – that many places now have a Leftwing theme you better soft shoe to or be fired.

    Like 1984’s Winston during the 2 Minutes of Hate, play along.

    So do “we” counter?
    I don’t know, but there better be a long-term plan to rid these people from any publicly funded environment and any environment with children. So almost every fcking school in the US and Canada.

    And then they need to be marginalized into straits so dire, they take themselves out of the picture, hopefully through drug OD’s or eating bus grills.

  10. Banishment works.
    Free speech is great.
    Every retards praising or making excuses for Kirk’s Assassination exposed themselves.
    Good for them.
    These misfits seem unable to understand forbearance,tolerance,civil behaviour or personal responsibility.
    Now the reward for their destructive behaviour is coming..
    So Sad.Too Bad.

    Retribution is human nature.
    We have always let the vicious and stupid run free,giving them benefit of doubt..Because we are not vicious and stupid.
    Now they have told us who they are and what they wish upon us for decades..
    And their actions confirm their words.
    I believe them.
    In the same way the Israelites believe Hamas.
    They have chosen to put themselves into that wonderful category..People who cannot be lived with.
    They have chosen extermination.
    Heh,they are a death cult.
    Giving them what they demand is your Christian Duty.
    The most nonviolent treatment will be banishment,running the irrational parasites out of the communities they so proudly hate.
    A time honoured and proven treatment for the terminally stupid.

    But the new rules of our progressive comrades?
    Sure their way can work too.
    The communist way has butchered more civilians than any other cult.

    And all who have the disease,that naked lust and need for power over others…
    Retribution is the only thing they understand.
    When you chose to ride the tiger,that dismount is a real bitch.
    Inciting a riot has always been a criminal act..
    Except when our Progressive Comrades do it…or so they have claimed.

  11. Mark Sivek, an incoming director for the Las Vegas Realtors board of directors has just lost his position there:
    https://www.fox5vegas.com/2025/09/12/las-vegas-realtors-incoming-board-director-removed-after-charlie-kirk-comments

    Furthermore, his business has now been decimated: https://www.realtor.com/realestateagents/56c4e3b17e54f701002238ff#ratings-and-reviews

    Do you all remember this that I posted: https://www.smalldeadanimals.com/2025/09/05/photoblogging-47

    What kind of person would publicly and non-anonymously say something that any reasonable person would consider to be extremely offensive and almost certainly lose them their job or drive business away from them? Two possibilities come to mind:

    1. They’re insane, driven by years of hate in their head & heart.
    2. Or they’ve gotten away with such behavior for so long now, that they couldn’t even contemplate that New Rules are now in place.

    1. 3. They live in an echo chamber (social media) of leftist hate that has normalized malignant thought.

      1. 4. And those echoes have escaped the chamber and the Leftists are reaping their own whirlwind. And deservedly so.

  12. Larry Correia
    @monsterhunter45

    These poor fools are missing the big picture.
    When there’s a killing the left always tries to assign the killer to the right. We’re used to it. And the vast majority of the right always overwhelmingly condemns the killer.

    Only this time all the moderate normie republicans out there saw MILLIONS of liberals celebrate and justify the brutal murder of a man… all because that man held beliefs similar to theirs. Beliefs that regular Americans consider completely normal and common sense.

    These normal folks were going about their day, then they saw some shocking brutality, and before they could even process it all their liberal friends were dancing in the blood and gleefully justifying it. “He deserved it for believing X and Y.” And that normal person realized that they also believe X and Y, so them getting murdered would be just as celebrated too. At best they saw a “Murder is bad, BUT… he deserved it for believing X and Y.”

    And the lights go on.

    It doesn’t matter how hard the left scrambles to put the shooter in some particular ideological bucket to cover their asses and take no blame (as usual), because regular America saw how fucking gleeful libs were when somebody just like them dies horribly, and they realized that the left wants them dead. Not metaphorically. They want you to die. Some of us have known this for a long time because we pissed off the left somehow previously, but for the regular folks coming to that understanding is a life changing moment.

    You ain’t brushing this one off, Glenn.

    ~from front page of Ace of Spades

    most interesting thing I’ve read today

    1. Larry gets this stuff at a higher level.

      What the Lefties dancing in Charlie Kirk’s blood simply do not get is that Charlie Kirk represented -engagement- and -outreach-. His was the least-radical position.

      Mine is a little more like this: “Okay, you f-ed around for 45 years. Now you find out.” I’m very in favor of job losses, company bankruptcies, and widespread shunning. Che Guevara t-shirt gets you ejected from any decent establishment. You know, like what they’ve been doing to us, except harder and faster because they are wildly outnumbered.

      Deal Lefties and stupid mammals who seem bent on not getting it, mine is not a radical position. This is the new middle. You don’t get to dance in the blood of an innocent man and skate away laughing this time.

    1. From the braind-damaged mammal’s link:

      “It goes like this: A tragedy happens.”

      All of you liberals are the same, inside your heads. You think if you change the words around you can bend the world into a shape you like. Like it’s magic or something.

      It’s not a -tragedy-. It is an -atrocity-. Those two things are not the same. You persist in pretending they are. We can see you doing it. We’ve seen it for a very long time. Since the 1980s.

      The joke, I do believe, is now over. You will no longer be allowed to pretend that an atrocious political murder is a mere tragedy.

      2. You may have notice, Phantom, that I didn’t call it a tragedy. The Fire did. Take it up with them.

        And I’m not a liberal, and you sure the hell aren’t a conservative.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation