Thank You For Your Attention To This Matter

47 Terrorism 24 Comments

@Based_Jedi – Impressive that everyone was watching the B2s in Guam when the real attack came from a different direction entirely, and not in 14 days. And most importantly, no leaks.

@wretchardthecat – With the US strike on Fordow every narrative has to be reframed. Trump as Putin’s stooge, European presumptions, China’s expectations. All in the dumpster. What world are we in? Nobody knows.

Update: Trump addresses the nation.

As an aside, every purported photo and video circulating social media of the attack has so far been a fake (old video).

24 Replies to “Thank You For Your Attention To This Matter”

  4. And if I may add … Hey Obama! John Kerry! Valerie Jarrett! FKCU-YOU!! Behold the Trump-Iran Nuclear Deal! And Tucker … and Bannon … FKCU-YOU too!

    And may I suggest that when Trump told the people of Teheran to vamoose! There is most likely a VERY good reason. Watch out. Iran’s complete military capability and Theocratic leadership is likely to become past-tense. Very Quickly. No. Trump doesn’t do “forever wars” or half-assed measures.

    Free, Free … the Iranian people!

    1. Why did I just BUY-BUY-BUY !! Oil stocks … even though Brian Z. said DRILL BABY DRILL depresses oil prices and hence hurts his oil worker constituents? Banks dumped $900 Billion into fossil fuel financing in 2024.

      https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Banks-Drop-the-Climate-Pretense-and-Follow-the-Money.html

      ESG is nothing more than a bitter remnant of the FAILED three Obama terms in office (Biden, my ass).

      The reality? These banks were never designed to hit climate targets. Their mandate is to maximize returns. And with interest rates stabilizing, oil prices firming, and energy demand still rising globally, fossil fuel investments—messy, profitable, scalable—are back in vogue.

    2. “Will Iran attack them?”

      And lose their remaining oil refining capability for doing so? Doubtful. They are in enough trouble already.

  6. “What comes next could go a LOT of different ways.”
    and
    “What world are we in? Nobody knows.”

    This is the situation right now, pray that things don’t heat up or blow up (no puns, no nothing) as a consequence.

  7. “A full payload of bombs”

    _________________________________

    That’s over 20 Tons of armaments per B-2. I’ll bet that made some noise.

    1. George Bush II wanted out of foreign wars before 9-11. Islam as an end of the world cult had and has other ideas. If someone wants to bring about the end of the world, and is a credible threat (this is the divisive part of the discussion – what changed?) then shouldn’t they be stopped?

      1. Wars never end until someone wins. “Peacekeeping” just prolongs them a generation or two.

    3. A war entails using all branches of the military, especially ground forces, not just aerial strikes on selected targets.

  9. What world are we in?

    A world where the President of the United States of America understands he’s the President of the United States of America, and not the President of China’s overseas colony, the President of the Muslim Brotherhood, or the President of His Bank Account.

  10. Re: Trump’s extension of two more weeks to resume Nuclear talks with Iran … Trump ended it with the salutation… Thank You For Your Attention to this Matter. Sadly, Iran paid NO attention to the matter. Why would they!? They’re not afraid of ‘TACO’ Trump. TACO, TACO, TACO … well, that didn’t age well, did it? Perhaps the Mullah’s watch way too much CNN?

    And now we wait for Biden’s imported sleeper cells to commit terrorism here in America. Thanks Joe! , err your cabal of auto-pen signatories. Traitorous scum.

  12. BBC (I checked so you don’t have to) is reporting that in the past few days, fake AI videos and images of Iran’s military capabilities have had 100 million views across multiple platforms..

    Many images and videos posted today, of bombings from Syria labeled as Iranian bombings.

    1. I’ve found only one video of a bombing, taken from a distance, that looks legit and is backed up by geolocation.

    1. Further to your point, Davis, ‘negotiations’ (as opposed to conflict) only work when both sides want an honest resolution. When one side is irrational, fanatical, and consistently deceitful all bets are off…
      https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx
      The corollary to that is why would you ever agree to anything knowing that the other side compulsively lies.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation