Safe and Effective®

Safe and Effective 33 Comments

Steve Kirsch- COVID vaccine injury study published on preprint server because the mainstream medical journals refused to publish it

It shows that vaccine injury is real. How prevalent? The study doesn’t address that. It points out the vaccine injured are indeed vaccine injured. A giant step forward.

Bill Rice Jr.-JD Vance admits perhaps up to 111 million Americans had painful reactions to Covid shots

New York Times- Scientists Describe Rare Syndrome Following Covid Vaccinations

33 Replies to “Safe and Effective®”

  1. Mom and Dad burned the house down and ate the family dog..
    —
    Nothing the children can do :).. Except hope for the best…

  2. From the New York Times article: “The Covid-19 vaccines were powerfully protective, preventing millions of deaths.”. Absolute nonsense, and getting very tiresome. Now I know MSM sources are obliged to include this type of disclaimer, but at this point it is also a transparent lie that no one believes anymore.

    1. Yeah, about those millions of deaths prevented, I believe that comes from the Lancet study linked below.

      Notice that in the four-sentence “Findings” section the word “estimate” appears five times and “could have been” two times. That many estimates and could haves do not findings make.

      https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00320-6/fulltext

      We find more estimating under “Methods”:

      A mathematical model of COVID-19 transmission and vaccination was separately fit to reported COVID-19 mortality and all-cause excess mortality in 185 countries and territories. The impact of COVID-19 vaccination programmes was determined by estimating the additional lives lost if no vaccines had been distributed. We also estimated the additional deaths that would have been averted had the vaccination coverage targets of 20% set by COVAX and 40% set by WHO been achieved by the end of 2021.

  3. “The Covid-19 vaccines were powerfully protective, preventing millions of deaths”

    Nothing screams bought-and-paid-for like opening your essay with something completely unsupportable, unmeasurable, and now, laughable.

  4. For about a year after the two jabs I took … I would wake in the middle of the night … in the middle of a nightmarish dream with my heart pounding out of my chest. No, I have never had and still don’t have Atrial fibrillation or ANY heart ailment.

    These episodes were completely out of character and out of any health reason. They’ve subsided, and (hopefully) ended as I haven’t experienced any of this for almost two years.

    But the jabs may well have predicated this. I cannot think of anything else that could.

  6. The Covid-19 vaccines were powerfully protective, preventing millions of deaths.
    That is purple prose.
    Just back from the grocery store, and the cashiers I know.
    Anecdotal but…
    “we are all continually sick. phoning in sick, etc. It must be because we don’t get enough time off. Cough! Right?”
    ( she said with a look of fear in her face).
    Me, unvaxxed and packing my own groceries and all that, says, “take care”
    I see this all the time.
    They are Vaxxed and now with HIV. And worse, for my bud who suddenly got turbo cancer of the everything.
    What have they done?!

    1. Those vaxes seriously weakened the immune system for many. There are many people with chronic ailments.Others facing serious disability and of course many also died.

  7. “The Covid-19 vaccines were powerfully protective, preventing millions of deaths.”

    As believable and scientific as “drinking paint was powerfully protective, preventing millions of attacks by the bogeyman.”

  8. Allow me to quote the first sentence of the paper’s summary.

    COVID-19 vaccines have prevented millions of COVID-19 deaths.

    1. At a 1% fatality rate, and with those who did die having on average 3+.comorbidities,claiming millions were saved is complete fantasy. It is just not credible.

      1. Exactly. Avg age of covid death in Oz. 86 yrs. Avg life expectancy. 84 yrs. It was always about the 2020 election , facts be damned.

      1. It puts COVID anti-vaxxers in an awkward position. How do they claim that this paper shows that vaccines are inordinately dangerous, while dismissing other parts of the paper as false?

        1. Easy to claim, impossible to prove or disprove. There is zero correlation between vaxxed and unvaxxed with regarfs to deaths and cases. None, zIp, nada. It didnt matter if you were jabbed or pureblood whether you got covid or didnt get it, whether you were hospitalized or not or whether you died or not. In Australia, in september 2022 when they stop posting the data in the only state that had the integrity ( stupidity?) To post the data, 53% of the deaths were quadrupled jabbed and not a single unjabbed person died out of a total of 1026 deaths. Every covid death was jabbed when 85% of the country had at least 2.. im betting history will prove the covid jads are thalidamide 2.0

          1. This is incorrect. There have been countless scientific studies that showed that the unvaccinated died at a greater rate from COVID than the vaccinated. And government statistics back this up.

            To quote “unvaccinated patients were 2.46 times more likely to die from COVID-19.”

            https://www.cureus.com/articles/163598-unveiling-the-impact-of-covid-19-vaccines-a-meta-analysis-of-survival-rates-among-patients-in-the-united-states-based-on-vaccination-status#!/

          3. I’ll just add this about real vaccines, which modified RNA isn’t:

            There are many different kinds of vaccines. Some are made by killing the bacteria or virus and then injecting it into you. Others may be a weaker form of the virus or bacteria. Some may just be pieces of the virus or bacteria, not the whole thing. Once these are injected into you, your body is fooled into thinking that you are infected and your immense system attacks and destroys it. Your immune system now remembers that, and should you get infected with the real thing, your immune system is primed and ready to react much faster than before.

          4. So we are to dismiss tens of thousands of scientific papers on mRNA vaccines as wrong because a constitutional lawyer named KrisAnne Hall, in an article for the Independent Sentinel, says they can’t work.

            Yeah, not in this lifetime.

          5. KM, considering that almost the entire medical community has been pushing the jab BS from the beginning I say, hell, yes.

            I repeat, the covid jabs are not vaccines. Any study that says so is automatically suspect.

          6. Lupus:

            This is consistent with what I’ve seen here. The anti-COVID-vaxxers are essentially a gang of conspiracy theorists. They have bugger all for solid evidence, but rather an abiding faith that almost every COVID vaccine researcher is corrupt and bought out. Given that these researchers number in the tens of thousands and are found around the world, this is plainly ludicrous, but that does not seem to occur to the anti-vaxxers. It’s more thrilling for them to believe that they are part of a special clique whose remarkable powers of perception have uncovered a massive conspiracy, while everyone else around them is blind.

          7. Just where do you get those “tens of thousands” researchers from. Have you delved into all of that research. If not quit claiming “case closed”.

          8. That there are tens of thousands of researchers is obvious from the fact that there tens of thousands of papers on COVID vaccines, and each paper probably averages half a dozen authors at least. Grok estimates there are 50 to 100,000 such researchers.

    3. And DR Brix just said the vaccine should have only been used on the old and sick.

      OOPS!
      I wonder who lied.

  9. If Steve Kirsch tells you water is wet, better check it out for yourself. He claims “All mainstream medical journals they tried to submit the paper to refused to consider publishing it.” but gives no evidence of that claim. The New York Times article that he links to right after that statement makes no mention of it.

    1. If the New York Times publishes anything, assess whether it advances a progressive (democrat) agenda or not. If not it will be slanted, diminished and unreliable. Perhaps the most biased major paper in existence.

      1. Doesn’t matter if you believe the NYT article or not. The point is that it doesn’t support Kirsch’s contention that the paper has been rejected by numerous medical journals. I suspect that Kirsch threw that allegation in to spice up his article, knowing that few of his minions fact check.

        In fact, the very wording of his allegation is a little odd. Journals can’t generally stop you from submitting a paper. It’s done automatically online.

  10. “[The Covid vaccine will] turn out to be the worst mistake they ever made.”
    “Public confidence is shattered, it will never be regained. So now we are in a majority of people… More than half the adult population of the world are anti-vaxxers.”

    https://m.vk.com/wall578916739_46787

    1. People keep saying that. Professor Dolores Cahill famously claimed that “anyone who’s over 70 who gets one of these mRNA vaccines will probably be — sadly die within about two to three years.” That was in early 2021.

      There is no scientific basis to the claim that nRNA vaccines are inordinately dangerous. You are free to present scientific evidence otherwise.

    1. Interesting. Thank you.

      So the lead author did not say that this paper has been rejected by multiple journals, but that a much earlier paper had. That clarifies things.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation