54 Replies to “Has the UK PM Been Snubbed?”

  1. Because Keir Starmer is a WEF dictator, and he, as Katie Hopkins pointed out, sent 100 volunteers to help with Kamala’s campaign. Stupid idea.

      1. and it is being dealt with. what he did was foreign meddling.
        comes under the umbrella of stuff like spying, n korea’s counterfeit american currency,
        all manner of negative stuff. herr starmer THOUGHT he was setting up a cozy relationship with
        the america president. he is rightfully being DEALT WITH
        and what he did feel free to cite a similar example brit pm stirring up things in an american election if it is in any way normal and acceptable.

        1. Some of his people volunteered to work for Khamala as is their right. This is some pretty feeble ‘meddling’.

          1. Those ‘volunteers’ he sent over to interfere with elections were also unregistered foreign agents.

            Which is illegal.
            Unless your dad is the president and can give an 11 year blanket pardon.

          2. Where does it anywhere say that Starmer actively sent these people over there? What makes them ‘unregistered foreign agents’ besides the fact that OrangeTard says so?

          3. UnReal living up to his moniker.

            Where does it say that? Maybe this? And I really didn’t have to look hard for it, UnReal.
            https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/british-labour-party-sending-staff-to-campaign-for-harris-in-us-swing-states-united-kingdom-uk-left-leaning-kamala-harris-2024-election-democratic-party-north-carolina-pennsylvania

            Amazing that you couldn’t find it, or perhaps you just didn’t want to.
            It really was common knowledge, but leave it to you to deny reality, UnReal.

            There are plenty more references to find, if you only just took the time to look for it.

          4. It says his party sent people there and they were volunteers. BFD. You can stop grasping these straws now.

          1. The UnPerson’s game is to be annoying and disruptive as possible and have other commenters waste their time refuting him.
            It’s aimed at screwing up the much more sane give and take of a comment thread.
            Occasionally he throws out something sensible but that’s a distraction from his real goal.

    3. If he’s on Epstein’s list he could be a little worried that Trump will be releasing it on Day one? Could be the same for Justin as well?

      To be revealed!!!

      1. My bet is the WEF has blackmailing material on Starmer, as it does on Turdeau and many other politicos.
        I doubt that they moved in Epstein’s ambit.

    1. Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries! Pffffft! Pffft! Prrrfft! *initiate taunting dance*

  4. Starmer co-ordinated a group of approx 70 of his acolytes to work with the Demarxists, against Trump’s election.
    So, yeah, Starmer is unwelcome in TrumpWorld.

  5. My AI tells me:
    // US Inauguration Guest List
    Traditionally, foreign leaders do not attend US presidential inaugurations. However, President-elect Donald Trump has invited several world leaders to his inauguration on January 20, 2025, marking a departure from this precedent. Trump has invited leaders who share ideological similarities with him, such as Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, and former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Additionally, Trump extended an invitation to Chinese President Xi Jinping, who has reportedly declined the invitation. //

  6. There is no reason Keir Starmer should want to attend in the first place. Time for distance from America.

    2. and thats for herr starmer to decide
      perhaps Trump got word he would decline, another snub, so no invite in the 1st place,

    3. Yeah, good luck with that. I’m sure Starmer is too busy anyways…..too focussed on welcoming the new caliphate.

    4. So “UnMe” is the one who voted for Starmer. Almost nobody else did. Sure he won because the other party blew itself up, and Starmer has simply adopted the exact same policies that got the Tories thrown out. The Tories called the election to protect the duopoly and hold the election before Farage could get organized, because he would have won.

    6. But if Trump doesn’t want him there, Starmer HAS TO want to attend. How could he not? It cannot be right for him not to be there. Trump wants that!

      1. He’s here to enforce the approved “thinking,” confident we don’t get enough of it.

  9. The Turd™ is going to be having a cabinet meeting on the day of Trump’s inauguration, he’s having his own crisis at the moment. There are other “important” heads of state which won’t be at the inauguration, some liked, for example PM Giorgia Meloni, some not liked, for example The Turd™.
    I don’t think the disliked UK PM Starmer should feel one way or the other, and he likely will still have a rape crisis to deal with then. I doubt that crisis is going anywhere soon, their denial is thick.

    https://www.westernstandard.news/news/trudeau-to-host-cabinet-retreat-in-quebec-on-trumps-inauguration-day/61176

  11. Watching that video made me realize Canada has less in common with Britain with each passing year. I can only imagine how Americans feel about them.

    1. I agree. In practise, Canada has had nothing to do with Britain for any reasons other than pure sentimentality since 1931 and the Statute of Westminster, granting it independence in foreign policy. This was followed by the 1940 Ogdensburg Agreement, where Canada and the United States agreed to a joint defence policy for North America. (It was triggered by the fall of France in May, 1940.)

      After that, the only remaining legal tie was the requirement that the British Parliament amend Canada’s constitution at the request of the federal and provincial governments of Canada. That was terminated in the Constitution Act of 1982.

      1. British subjects who were permitted to vote in Canadian elections up to 25 June 1968 were permitted to continue voting in Canada until 1975. I don’t know if simple legal residence here while being a British subject was all that was required, but I do recall it changing in 1975. Someone in the MSM reporting for the gov’t… and I confirmed it at w.elections.ca now..

        I don’t know if that qualifies as a “legal tie” … it’s a minor point to me.

      1. We In Saskatchewan agree with her 100%! Scott Moe also agrees!
        Starmer should be band!

  13. It has nothing to do with the 100 UK volunteers that the Labour Party sent over. And, yes, Starmer is a member of said Labour Party. That happens all the time. However, the Trump team did file a complaint with the FEC. It was done tongue in cheek. It starts off this way:

    “When representatives of the British government previously sought to go door-to-door in America, it did not end well for them. This past week marked the 243rd anniversary of the surrender of British forces at the Battle of Yorktown, a military victory that ensured that the United States would be politically independent of Great Britain.”

    And, initially, there was no bad blood between Trump and Starmer. The two even met in September at Trump Tower in NYC. The meeting was cordial and optimistic. However, since then, Starmer has been taking heat for what may have been a very piss poor handling of the grooming gangs in the UK. Additionally, the UK is dabbling in full blown censorship inclusive of obligating social media platforms doing the dirty work for them, or face % of revenue penalties.

    I’d say the lack of invitation to Starmer has a lot more to do with his views on censorship, and Trump showing solidarity to what turned out to be one of his biggest dependable allies, Elon Musk.

  14. I’m projecting here but the only way Musk would have ok’d an invite is if the plan were to arrest him on arrival.

  16. L- President-elect D.J. Trump can see Starmer is a soon to be ex-Prime Minister. Britain’s
    political class is so bereft of talent and full of corruption. It seems to be changing leaders as often
    as Italy was famous for. In a country governed by the Uni-Party. None of them are allowed
    to actually reform anything. Former P.M. Liz Truss admitted that after her brief stay at #10
    Downing Street.

    The Administrative state allows leaders to pose for photo ops in the cockpit, but not to
    actually touch and move any of the leavers of power.

    1. I can see a mass revolt happening in England. Kind of like French farmers are wont to do, but exponentially so. The average bloke has had enough and it could get bloody. I predict many of the newcomers will flee back to their shithole countries of origin.

  18. I hope Trump doesn’t entertain anyone guilty of making hateful comments towards him.
    That includes Starmer, Lammy, Rayner, Streeting, Ed Millibrain, Nandy, Khan et al.

  19. 1. Helping Kamala against him in the election.
    2. Wanting to get rid of Diego Garcia.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation