Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
This is really interesting. I get some interested looks when I calculate a square root to 8-9 decimals quickly with a 4-function calculator with a memory (using Newton’s method for solving equations), but this Babylonian method is thousands of years older than this. Thanks for sharing.
mhb23re
Heh – it converges the same as Newton’s method, starting with an initial guess of 2 for square root of 5. It’s the same iterative process.
Damn clever, those Babylonians.
You can adapt Newton’s method to calculate any whole number root, and taking reciprocals, any integer root of a number, barring the undefined zeroth root, of course.
Most people have problems with addition and subtraction. Just look at government budgets.
That youtuber always bugged me, refusing to call the cosine law the cosine law, calling it “Al Kashi’s Theorem” instead.
I’m in my 80’s now, so you know I’m talking about the Dark Ages when I say that my middle-school math class required all students to master square-root calculations. (We didn’t have the benefit of the Babylonian tablet or of electronic calculators.)