37 Replies to “Pressing Legal Issue Of The Day”

  1. In the realm of transgenderism, with all the lunacy and degrading things that that encompasses, the act of a “doctor” making an open wound in a man’s groin are so that they can pretend to be a woman is the most grotesque and insane. This gets tossed around a lot, but if and when we do have another round of Nuremberg trials to sort all this out, any doctor having performed such an “operation” on another human being should be strung up in the street.

        1. Maybe it’s just me, Jojo, but your “pickle” metaphor, which seems to be your “bread and butter” these days, is growing a bit “dull” by now.
          Gherkin up your loins, as it ain’t kosher no more.
          Hope you relish that thought.
          Peace.

          2. Speaking of a pickle and a tickle … what will we call a Dick-pic … if it also includes a Front-hole?

    4. Detachable? Sure you could also turn it around on the days you need to dilate that opening. I want the patent on that.

  4. Ontario is officially F’ed up beyond redemption. The only province worth saving beyond the Saskatchewan border is probably Newfoundland, and that’s arguable.

    1. Ontario is saying no.
      We get to see if the judge says, sorry but the he’s entitled to a be a both a pussy and a dick at the public expense.

      1. It seems judges always say ‘yes’ to the loonie requests in these times of utter lunacy.

        1. Canuckguy – they should ask the lawyers what the vagina is made of if they don’t have a penis and scrotum to make it from. Skin from his arm or maybe abdomen?

  5. The court should offer s/he-it a coin toss: you either get a pseudovagina and keep your penis, or we take the penis and just patch over the site.

  6. So, people now aspire to surgically creating a genetic defect….aka, hermaphrodite.

    On a positive note, we can have a contest to name the procedure. I’m going to go with the “East German Women’s Shotput Procedure.”

  8. If the court decides the state should pay for vag. surgery and they allow a penis to remain as well… I expect by 2025 there will be court actions for those who would like 2 penis’ and a vag. or possibly 2 vag. and a penis.

    In case anyone is wondering on how fine an artificial vag. is, I recommend seeing some of the work put forward by medical’s leading edge. They look amazing. Amazingly bad. Some commenters said it was like a rotten fold more than anything, and it stunk. Not in a good way…. The artificial p made up of skin grafts from a forearm are equally substandard. I cannot articulate an opinion that doesn’t include saying these doctors are conducting criminal experiments.
    That is all.

    Hopefully, with the great die-off from gov’t sanctioned jabs there’ll be an end to this soon.

      1. Ghastly sight. But once it is left unshaven for a while, maybe, just maybe, not so bad a look. There is a reason why it has various nicknames: ‘beaver’, ‘pussy’, hair-pie’, ‘bird’, ‘bearded clam’, ‘bush’.

  9. the way l see it, the root cause of KS’s dilemma is
    ALL IN HER XER ITS THEIR XE’S F’ING HEAD
    as such the remedy must also be LIMITED to goings on it xer xe their it’s f’ing head.
    but being a common sense observation, in 2024 that aint enough.

  10. So a dick an artificial pussy and an arsehole walk into this bar, and the bartender says, “G’day Joostaihn”.

  11. If “they” had bothered checking, they would find that they already have a well used hole. How many holes do these perverts need?

  14. The case has effectively already been decided, and Ontario will lose. From this National Post article, in case you can’t open it, Ontario has already agreed to pay for the reverse operation: add a penis to someone born with a vagina and uterus without removing the original equipment.

    “In a similar case reported last year by the Globe and Mail, OHIP initially denied coverage to a 41-year-old Ottawa public servant who identifies as transmasculine non-binary and who was seeking the surgical construction of a penis without the removal of the vagina and uterus.

    Nathaniel Le May and his lawyers argued that phalloplasty, on its own, is listed as an insured service, and that OHIP was wrong in interpreting that it was only insured if also accompanied by a vaginectomy. The additional procedures, they also argued, amounted to coerced sterilization.

    Two days before the case was set to be heard by the appeal board, OHIP reversed its decision and agreed to fund the surgery.”

    1. Yup. They crossed the event horizon years ago when they funded the first peckerwrecktomy.

  15. All for what? The ability to become a FAKE Hermaphrodite and fill a weird niche’ in the porn world?

  16. If there were any doubts that we as a civil society are headed off a cliff this should put that all to rest . I feel sick for my grandchildren.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation