@LarryBrockMP – Once Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act was declared unconstitutional, his Justice Minister & Deputy rushed in front of cameras to declare their intentions to appeal. But! They forgot to do one thing…
@LarryBrockMP – Once Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act was declared unconstitutional, his Justice Minister & Deputy rushed in front of cameras to declare their intentions to appeal. But! They forgot to do one thing…
Dill pickles.
Wow, Larry Brock is very good! But the new Justice M is no small snake, he can slither through any questions no pb by giving non-answers in lawyereze.
Dementia Joe and loud-socks Trudeau
Will sell out their countries for a big pile of dough
We are all tired of the lying Buffoons
Who made Canada a land of cartoons
One thing Canadians all should now know
It is way passed time for Sock-boy to go
The Lieberal Party card carrying member failed lawyers in the Supreme Court were probably writing up a TurdHole friendly ruling when the Federal Court application was originally filed. One that would support the corrupt government no matter who would have to appeal the Federal Court decision. The speed of the announcement indicates the result is already known.
I will be totally (but happy) shocked if the Supreme Court rules against TurdHole.
It was found illegal so why aren’t the all Ass Holes in jail?
“It was found illegal so why aren’t the all Ass Holes in jail?”
– Well in all fairness, they did seriously consider another $100 ethics violation.
Brock and Genuis and Cooper have been tearing the Liberals new ‘back holes’ in the committees.
Is ‘potted plant’ unparliamentary language?
“Replace This Liberal Cabinet Minister with a Potted Plant”
https://youtu.be/KGLGU6deBiM
I don’t think framing the unconstitutionality of the imposition of Martial Law and the seizure of funds and accounts by diktat as merely a ‘reasonable disagreement’ is all that sound of a strategy. The government deciding that the government has acted illegally seems like at least a 3 alarmer.
Larry Brock should have noted the time frame of the other cases and notice of appeal. How long of an interval. He should have also asked who was in that room reviewing the decision. He should have noted on what medium did they release their notice to appeal? If a news conference, how many minutes to convene? if memo, how long to compose? 14 minutes can be made to look ridiculous if he had pressed a bit more. he left Virani with an out.
Will no one rid Me of this turbulent Court ?
I believe that means that they took 14 minutes to smoke a joint and then announced their intention to appeal.