23 Replies to “Pierre Poilievre vs. a Trudeau Media Apparatchik”

  1. He is a very patient man. My personnal reaction would be to tell her to STFU so I could answer. The age of gotcha journalism and sound bites.

  2. Accusations disguised as questions.
    Instead of, “Thank you for that question,” the correct response is “Thank you for that accusation.”

    1. Live and enjoy every day. Don’t wish for time to pass quickly. Life is short. Blackie will eventually be nothing but a bad dream.

      1. The Dauphin has children… has history taught us nothing?

        Either the guilloitine or exile to St. Pierre and Miquelon.

        Dig up Pierre’s coffin and make Justin paddle there on it. Send his slutty ex-wife on the trip too, along with Margaret, lest we keep repeating this nightmare.

        Canada can’t separate quick enough. We need a Westorcism.

        Oops! Did that get me on a government watch list?

        If you’re not on one already, you should be ashamed of yourself!

    2. Sorry to bear bad news – but the Charter allows these collectivist clowns to cling to power until September 2026, for the five year term they can hold out to. So cue up more interventionist intrusion bribery of a party less than one in five Canadians would vote for, along with their leader holding out for his MP pension until February 2025 when Justin’s mini me Singh will suddenly have a change of heart?

  3. He answered her question. No media subsidies. Not CBC. Nobody. Next question. Oh, time for a speech?
    The mediocracy minion couldn’t handle his answer; was it was beyond her cashable collectivist comprehension?
    So she launched into interruptions, talking over points and arguing, all as therapy for her cognitive dissonance.
    The icing on the cake was the Grit gopher groper green grifter head explosions on X afterwards, bot and paid for.

    1. Ideology. Or straight up control, there are so many ex-spooks working for the networks you’d think its part of their retirement plan. Apparently you can tell which 3 letter agency leaked what info by the paper they used to do it.

  4. Okay…so why was this CP reporter claiming over and over that the CPC “wanted to grant over 100 million dollars in regulatory relief to the mainstream media”? When did they ever say that? Was she confused, and thinking she was talking to Justin Trudeau?

    1. Maybe she is trying to say they plan to take away the $100 million in “regulatory relief” that Justin was offering them?

      1. “Maybe she is trying to say they plan to take away the $100 million in “regulatory relief” that Justin was offering them?”

        That would make much more sense, but it isn’t what she was actually saying. Confusing as hell…

  5. l still maintain selling the CBC is great way to defuse any future whining grudges and sympathy. pass it off as merely a business transaction.

  6. Ask everyone in Argentina if they like their most recent “regulatory relief”.
    Who is Canada’s chainsaw?

Navigation