To roaring applause: Lynne Pinches refuses to play against trans woman Harriet (Harry) Haynes in the EPA Women’s Champions of Champions Final today
To roaring applause: Lynne Pinches refuses to play against trans woman Harriet (Harry) Haynes in the EPA Women’s Champions of Champions Final today
X thinks this is a disturbing video that we should be protected from seeing involuntarily.
It has the potential to melt snowflakes. And you know how peaceful those snowflakes who are injected with lots of testosterone can be.
Hoist by her sister’s petard!
Finally, women are getting the business end of what they have been voting for.
But stay tuned, it’s only early innings yet.
Much, much more hysteria to come.
To say nothing of the wailing and gnashing of of the pearly whites.
BTW. No physical advantage in pool.
Is she afraid?
A misandrist?
Affirmative action recipient/non-believer?
Beware the roosting chickens.
“BTW. No physical advantage in pool.”
I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic, so here’s a list. Reach, height, upper body strength, hand/eye coordination, fast-twitch vs slow twitch muscle fibers greater in males, bone size and bone density greater in males, tendon size bigger in males, grip strength, etc.
Why is there a women’s division at all? Because otherwise it isn’t a fair competition.
Lynne didn’t have the balls to play against the other . . . . . . woman.
I like the way she chalks her stick.
Couldn’t figure out what was happening in the video but what they were doing is called a “lag” to determine who breaks, I’m sure that’s common knowledge to most here – Me, not so much. Ms.Pinches sunk her ball in the far pocket on purpose and decided to call it a day.
Good on her.
Harry Haynes. There’s an underwear joke in there somewhere.
Cue up the wambulance…
It will be interesting to see if Lynne Pinches is censured or punished by the English Pool Association.
By allowing transgenders to play in the women’s division, the EPA has marked out its territory. Now we’ll see how vigorously they’ll defend it.
Looks like the “female” opponent had a thick coiffe of sideburns, but maybe that’s the style now.
This is what all women need to do when faced with a fake opponent.
Yes. Every female swimmer going up against the guy at Penn State should have stood in the starting blocks then walked away when the race was started.
Should have walked away when he showed up in the friggin’ locker room. Left the dude to swim in an empty pool, and stand on an empty podium.
That’s what will happen eventually anyway, women will quit these “Women’s Sport” organizations and leave it all to the cheaters. Women’s power lifting against men? Nobody is going to play that.
While I agree with the principle, could someone please explain what advantage men have over women playing pool?
Reach.
Upper body strength.
Height.
Male hand/eye coordination, (which oh by the way operates differently than it does in women. Occulus Rift found that out a few years ago trying to make VR goggles that didn’t nauseate half the players.)
Percentage of fast-twitch vs. slow-twitch muscle fibers in males is higher than in females.
Bone density and bone size. (Yes, that’s an advantage. Increased rigidity of the skeleton means harder/faster/more accurate shots.)
And so on. Why do we even have a female division in the first place? To even the playing field. Men playing against women isn’t fair. Plain and simple.
Generally, the best women will lose against not the best men. Prove me wrong. Shooting (with guns) seems to be the one sport that women do just as well in. But who invented the gun? LOL
“Shooting (with guns) seems to be the one sport that women do just as well in.”
I noticed that myself, years ago.. They seem to be less shaky or something…
Nahhhh… Not less shaky, Fred. They just take a deep breath and pretend they’re shooting their alcoholic gambling cheating ex and, well… you know the rest.
Eventually there’ll be two divisions.
One for men.
And another for faggots.
Perhaps that was always the plan.