Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
One. Where the hell was this rug to get that dirty? Two. If they turned a $1 rug into a $100,000 rug, that’s less work than I do in my yard every fall. LOL
Thomas, I looked at the queued videos and there were several that were in similar condition due to sewerage pipe backups or floodwater damage. This looked to be pretty similar.
The $1 to $100,000 was probably the insurance company writing off the carpet and selling it as salvage. IMO, the $1 to $100,000 is just click bait, but the carpet was certainly bought for pennies on the dollar and was probably worth quite a lot.
Then again, maybe it was a $100,000 carpet from a fine old house on a river that had 6 inches of river mud on it for a week after the water finally went down.
Who knows? On the internet, no one knows you’re a dog. The cleaning was real, though.
–
–
–
My questions are, where is this being done? Is the water going into a storm drain and not a sanitary sewer? Is anyone having a look at the wastewater discharge from this facility? Do the catfish in the river two blocks over have 3 eyes, 6 legs, and glow in the dark?
After seeing that, I now realize some people keep their cows, pigs, and chickens in the living area.
Probably died of hoof and mouth disease ?
Some of the comments at the Youtube link allege it’s fake. But it’s fascinating in the classic clothes-in-the-dryer laundromat genre.
95% of restoration videos on YouTube are fake.
Rug cleaning, car detailing, rusty tools, sea turtles. All fake.
??? 95 percent? Really, Bunny? In God we trust. All others bring data.
I have restored several tools from the mid to late 1800s into the early 1900s. A hobby of mine is woodworking with hand tools from that period. I can’t afford the pristine examples and I wouldn’t use one if I did have it in mint condition. I buy *ahem* less than desirable examples on the cheap and restore them to perfectly good, usable, and really nice-looking old tools. (I just finished restoring a ’60s vise from Western Auto. A gift from my brother’s junk pile. That took a good 20 hours.)
I’ve had to make a couple of handles from tree branches for a hatchet and a draw knife because the handle forms cannot be bought anywhere anymore. Handles can be the hard part. Rust is often just a few chemicals and a lot of elbow grease.
I will agree that 95% of the videos are misleading. a) It ain’t as easy as it looks ii) Some of the handwork takes hours 3) Sometimes special equipment is needed that isn’t part of most people’s basement or garage shop. iv) That half hour video is generally many, many, MANY hours of work.
Should have just said “most”
What is this? Reddit? I gotta provide proof?
I assume most people at SDA can figure it out for themselves.
Can’t post multiple links without comment getting sent to moderation,
Here’s one on how to spot fake gun restorations
https://youtu.be/tLBcugd8VQU?si=8bPl70R5gHIeOBco
An my favorite, sea turtles
https://youtu.be/itYFT-BWHjE?si=UEblEh6TNIwQ8GGH
I’ve never run across any of those sea turtle videos, Bunny. Good grief, are they ever obviously fake.
BTW, yes, if you had used ‘most’ instead of 95%, I wouldn’t have questioned the assertion about fake videos.
I’ve seen a few of the gun restorations and I don’t see why they would be fake. I’d just never fire one of those restored guns unless it was maybe, MAYBE a 20% power load.
I appreciate the correction H.R.
I work with too many young people all day. Wild exaggeration just becomes the norm.
At least I didn’t say “literally ”
Thanks.
95% of quoted statistics are fake đŸ™‚
I might actually be generous there
That’s why Bunny said that ‘most’ would have been a better choice, and I agree.
‘Most’ can be anywhere from 51% to 99%. Let the reader decide where to draw the line.
BTW, it’s 93.6% of quoted statistics that are made up on the spot, Greg ;o)
(The wee bit after the decimal makes it sound more authoritative, don’t you think?)
That’s Hillary’s White House office carpet.
Poor Vince.
Ha Ha Ha
“That’s Hillary’s White House office carpet.
Poor Vince.”
Poor Vince? Heck! Poor carpet cleaners. You think they are still around to talk about that cleaning job?