16 Replies to “We Don’t Need No Stinking Giant Fans”

  1. Unfortunately, woke people look at these types of charts and see very different solutions than we do.

    When we see the gap between supply and demand due to intermittent power, we understand that the solution is more reliable baseload power. When the woke see the gap between supply and demand, they think the solution is to decrease demand so intermittent power sources “work”.

    Very different realities. Different worlds. Reality vs Fantasy, imo.

  2. Back in the day when I ran a small industrial concern with 3 phase power, part of the power bill was based on peak demand. Why isn’t half the payment to solar and wind electrical suppliers based on minimum supply?

    1. Because at the time the first push for “green energy” occurred, the connected wouldn’t want to get paid based on minimum supply?

      The solar and wind was also given priority sales even over the baseload units, which of course harmed the baseload suppliers, because they were expect to shed supply first, which in the case of certain suppliers decreased their efficiency substantially, raising their prices.

      All of this was political decision, rather than an engineering decision.

  3. Bjorn Lomborg @BjornLomborg Sep 10
    There is essentially no wind anywhere in Europe right now

    True yesterday, also true now

    https://nitter.net/BjornLomborg/status/1700919134681227392#m

    Robert Bruce Willsie @bobw222 20h Replying to @BjornLomborg
    No problem. They can just hook half the windmills up to batteries and turn them into giant fans. The wind from these fanmills will power all of the remaining windmills and the power from then can recharge the batteries.

    Follow me for my unbelievable sciency, windmilly, and climate changey stuff.

  4. I would find this hilarious:

    Someone in the private community invents a clean form of efficient and environmentally friendly energy. Then, that same person encrypts his patent submission as a tease. The patent, of course, wouldn’t be realized (which wasn’t the intention). And, if it had, the Federal Government has the ability (since 1949) to declare eminent domain on any patent filed. But, the very fact that such a process exists and no one can use it because they can’t make sense of the submission while strong anecdotal evidence existed suggesting that this new form of energy was indeed real would be awesome. The enviro nitwits would be beside themselves.

    The icing on the cake would be if the inventor drove around in a huge gas guzzling HumVee and told every interviewer that Climate change was bullshit. You’d have to carry an umbrella around to protect yourself from exploding heads.

  5. Barf.. They exaggerate the solutions to climate change almost as much as the exaggerate climate change itself.. One hand washes the other.. While the fail is obvious for anybody willing to look the FREE MONEY is still hanging overhead like a overstuffed piñata..

    It would be a shame for somebody else to get it :).. Save the world and all that BS..

    1. They have no choice. The various parties that mandated the purchase of carbon credits neglected to include a hold harmless agreement in the purchasing language. Should climate change be proven beyond a doubt to be non-anthropomorphic in the future, those parties are subject to fraud.

  6. The problem isn’t the average output or the Commies’ solution would be true; just build more pinwheels.

    The real problem is the intermittency; all that spiky up and down on the graph. That destabilizes the grid and is why every windmill installation requires spinning reserve to jump in and cover the drops.

    Whirligigs require two systems: pinwheels and reliable spinning reserve backup. Why not skip the unreliable, intermittent part and just use the reliable spinning reserve?

    [In my best Mr. Rogers’ voice]
    Can you say “Graft, corruption, cronyism, kickbacks masked by a false ‘Save The Planet’ narrative?” I knew you could.

Navigation