“After the first dose, we were surprised to find the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine elicits an unexpected memorylike response in the immune system, recognizing the vaccine as if it’s something it’s seen before,” says Professor Lynn, from the College of Medicine and Public Health at Flinders University.
“This response is targeted against the adenovirus vector in the vaccine, not the Spike protein and the intensity of this response correlates with the expression of proteins that act as a pre-cursor to thrombosis, or blood clotting.
Related: my expectation was that fixing this data would make the negative signal for all cause mortality from vaccines clear. this was going to be too big to hide. well, i was half right. it was too big, but they seem to have gone to massive lengths to hide it.
I faked every embolism.
“However, this was rectified once they had their third booster dose of an mRNA vaccine, illustrating the importance of booster doses. “
Fukc. You.
Keep taking it folks, dead people never have to worry about tomorrow.
Natural immunity is the way to go. With Ivermectin for stubborn cases. So glad I avoided the jab
Directly related: https://youtu.be/V2YGdDbZpSg
I had both AstraZen shots. As only 92000 in the country had.
I believe the viral vector base of it ( a flu shot) would have the least effects on me.
(I consider myself still a pureblood)
Only 9 %of the population contracted the Coof and only 0.01% died.
Considering a 92 % cormobility rate and that was to those principally over 85.
“Professor Lynn says age is a factor, with older people generally having a lower immune response after two doses. Fortunately, a third booster dose was highly effective at overcoming this.”
No sh*t Sherlock.
By the time the 3rd shots where rolled out the extreme vulnerable where dead.
I believe the gov suppressed Astra.
The blood clot scare is crap as the chances of clotting in a airline flight are greater.
I had 2 AZ jabs (April & June 2021) with no adverse reactions. No boosters for me and no intention to ever have another ‘vaxxine’ of any kind unless I can be assured it’s not a mRNA type and even then I will have to think long and hard before agreeing.
I thought that the chimpanzee adenovirus had been used in lots of other vaccines. Did it also cause that reaction in the previous vaccines?
I’m an engineer and an MBA. I have a tiny bit of exposure to statistics.
I look at his chart of All Cause Mortality, and I see for the lower age groups, that there is a slightly higher death rate than vax rate. For 18-39, it’s 69% vaxxed, 77% of deaths. For 40-49, it’s 79% vaxxed, 82.5% of death. After that, the numbers get even closer.
Now, there is a slight indication there that there is excess mortality associated with the vax, but it’s not at all strong, based on this data. For example, in the 18-39 group, it’s understandable that young, healthy, skeptical adults would say “Nyet” to the vax. The ones *more likely* to take the vax are probably those with underlying health problems who wanted to ‘stay safe’.
So I’ll suggest the overall health profile of those who took the vax was slightly poorer than those who refused, and that’s what we are seeing – both the unvaxed and vaxed are dying as normal, but because of the generally poorer overall health of those who chose to be vaccinated, they still die at a slightly rate. The vax is not causing their deaths.
The message is “The vaccines do nothing”. They don’t prevent you from acquiring it, they don’t prevent you from spreading it, and they don’t prevent you from dying from it. That is by far the most important message to take from this data.
Kevin, I believe his argument is that this data is so bad as to be “rigged”.
Not a single progressive I asked could answer why Canada, which ranks near the bottom middle of all civilized healthare systems, was ok with AZ when European countries were ‘nope, not good’.
Not one.