“I was threatened, my life was threatened”
The former Center for Disease Control and Prevention director who was cast as a conspiracy theorist for saying the evidence supported the lab-leak explanation for COVID-19 – allegedly provoking death threats – claims that the real “conspiracy is Collins, Fauci, and the established scientific community.”
Robert Redfield told former Senate Finance Committee investigator Paul Thacker that National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci “knew” he funded gain-of-function research that makes viruses more dangerous, and “misled Congress” when he denied it,” but “[n]othing’s going to happen as long as the Biden administration is here.”
“Tony and I are friends, but we don’t agree on this at all,” Redfield said in an interview published in Thacker’s Disinformation Chronicle newsletter.
“Everyone had to agree to the narrative” pushed by Fauci and then-National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins that SARS-CoV-2 emerged from a “wet market” in Wuhan, not the Fauci-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology miles away, to avoid becoming a public target of the two officials, he said.
The virologist Redfield told the immunologist Fauci from the “second or third week in January” 2020 that “I’m very concerned that he was championing this theory that it came from animals.”
The particulars of the novel coronavirus, such as the furin cleavage site and the “human” sequence in it, make clear that it’s not from bats, he said. “This thing was manipulated, orchestrated. That cleavage site was created.”
Transmission doesn’t make sense under natural evolution, according to Redfield. “You have a virus that is one of the most infectious viruses in the history of humanity, and yet that virus no longer can infect the bat? … No, this is highly abnormal.”
Yes.. And the ones responsible are the ones who put in and kept the most draconian covid measures.. That would be Canada and Australia / New Zealand.. Do I have to do all the work for you?..
Hire the Best remote software developers
When deciding whether or not to hire a remote developer, factors such as the project’s complexity and the developer’s skills should be considered. There are many benefits for employers and their employees when using a performance-based compensation system. As a bonus, hiring a remote developer brings benefits to the global environment that we all need to work to protect.
What’s the Process for Hiring Remote Developers?
Discover the Proper Work Board and Post Your Posting
Sort Through the Applications
Pay Consideration to the Cover Letter
The Interview
Assessment and Testing
It goes without saying that any farther designer you contract ought to be talented at programming. In any case, that isn’t the only thing they have to be be talented at. Hunt for individuals with these five characteristics to create beyond any doubt you’re getting a well-rounded worker with remaining control.
[url=https://workfreelancers.com/]android coders for hire[/url]
… but can you make $30,000.00/mo. working from your kitchen table, spambot?
Area nutjobs kvetches about being called a nutjob. News at 6.
“The particulars of the novel coronavirus, such as the furin cleavage site and the “human” sequence in it, make clear that it’s not from bats, he said. “This thing was manipulated, orchestrated. That cleavage site was created.””
The FCS is actually found in many other members of Coronoviridea: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211222/Furin-cleavage-site-similarities-in-SARS-CoV-2-and-rodent-coronavirus-indicate-common-wildlife-host.aspx
You seem to relish the mental gymnastics that are required to avoid Occam’s razor.
Your comment is just motivated reasoning identifying as Occam’s Razor.
Note the disclaimer at the bottom of the article
Important Notice:
bioRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.
The presence of the FCS in other viruses of this phylum is well-characterized prior to this study.
UnMe uses obfuscation and irrelevancy disguised as an argument.
No-one is claiming other virii don’t have the FCS.
The FCS in other virii was not manipulated, and by comparing the site in other virii against the site in CV, that is easily proven.
No it’s not. You’ve already made a fool of yourself on this subject quite enough I think.
unDORK
You stated that HCQ was not a good therapeutic for SARs 2, but it has now been proven to be very good. A doctor in a NYC hospital asked for an apology from Fartci, the WHO, and CDC, for supressing HCQ, as they had treated over 1000 patients with HCQ, and had not one death.
Also as allen you asserted that Pulitzer had not hacked a dominion vote counting machine, but pol pad, supporting the fact that the dominion machines were not hooked up to the internet. Now there is a big flurry by the government to secure the machines from being hacked, but they have not charged the dominion CEO for lying to congress about the fact that the machines ARE hooked up to the net .
You are full of shit on so many levels, and to STUPID to know when to shut the eff up!
” it has now been proven to be very good.”
No it hasn’t. At all. Neither has Ivermectin. The drug you need is lithium.
Whatever you say, Jabby:
(SEQ ID11652, nt 2751-2733) found in the U.S. patent 9,587,003.
Just a coincidence.
No vectors found for Covid 19 virus despite desperate hunt . Wet market “dog ate my homework” explanation for virus origin. Wuhan Virus Institute in close proximity to ground zero for virus. Virus Institute big into bats and bat viruses. Bat populations in question are situated far from Wuhan. Virus institute dicking around with gain of function in viruses. Not 100% proof of origin but way ahead of any other explanation. Redfield feels the lab leak explanation is most likely but Unme knows better.
I originally thought we in the US and Europe were covering up the Chinese Bio-Lab origin of COVID-19 because to accuse the Chinese Government Lab of creating COVID is tantamount to an act of war. Release of a deadly man-made virus would be an act of war by the third largest nuclear power and largest land army in the world.
Now it appears that COVID-19 is a deadly man-made disease created using US research dollars in a Chinese Bio-Weapons lab. Who is to blame? China? US? Both? Neither?
Why aren’t expert biologist third parties demanding the truth? Scientists in France, Britain, Italy, Europe? Australia? Maybe because those scientists and billion dollar research institutes want those same US Research Dollars, and do not want to piss off the US Government? Maybe they are doing the same type of research, and do not dare to complain too loudly, or have their own personal life-long career research banned and stopped also? There are hundreds of careers and billions of dollars involved worldwide. Maybe the experts think those tens of millions of faceless individuals killed by COVID-19 are just the cost of advancing human knowledge?
After all, what is the worst that can happen?
Another pandemic?
I have realized that in old digital cameras, exceptional sensors help to concentrate automatically. These sensors associated with some digital cameras change in in the area of contrast, while others employ a beam with infra-red (IR) light, especially in low lighting. Higher specification cameras sometimes use a combination of both programs and will often have Face Priority AF where the camera can ‘See’ a new face and focus only in that. Thank you for sharing your opinions on this blog.
Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this website. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very difficult to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and appearance. I must say that you’ve done a great job with this. In addition, the blog loads very fast for me on Internet explorer. Superb Blog!