Interview: Why the Chair of the Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission Thinks The US Government Is Preventing a Real Investigation Into the Pandemic
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs is the Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University and the President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. He has also served as the chair of the COVID-19 commission for leading medical journal the Lancet. Through his investigations as the head of the COVID-19 commission, Prof. Sachs has come to the conclusion that there is extremely dangerous biotechnology research being kept from public view, that the United States was supporting much of this research, and that it is very possible that SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, originated through dangerous virus research gone awry.
Prof. Sachs recently co-authored a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences calling for an independent inquiry into the virus’s origins. He believes that there is clear proof that the National Institutes of Health and many members of the scientific community have been impeding a serious investigation of the origins of COVID-19 and deflecting attention away from the hypothesis that risky U.S.-supported research may have led to millions of deaths. If that hypothesis is true, the implications would be earth-shaking, because it might mean that esteemed members of the scientific community bore responsibility for a global calamity. In this interview, Prof. Sachs explains how he, as the head of the COVID-19 commission for a leading medical journal, came to the conclusion that powerful actors were preventing a real investigation from taking place. He also explains why it is so important to get to the bottom of the origins of COVID: because, he says, there is extremely dangerous research taking place with little accountability, and the public has a right to know since we are the ones whose lives are being put at risk without our consent.
But he didn’t publish that in a peer reviewed journal so we better ignore that as being untrue. Oh wait…Lancet… Well it still can’t be true.
~sarcasm~
It’s Over: CDC Says People Exposed To COVID No Longer Need To Quarantine
“Sorry you guys had to miss your grandmother’s funeral, but at least you don’t have to quarantine anymore!”
That may as well have been the message that the CDC put out on Thursday, conceding after years of micromanaging a “crisis” that those who are exposed to Covid no longer need to quarantine, regardless of their vaccination status, something which would have gotten you banned on all social networks in a millisecond if you dared to tweet just a little over a year ago.
New guidelines only recommend that people who have been exposed “wear a mask for 10 days” and get tested for the virus on day 5, according to the New York Times, a radical departure from the prior draconian measures which required self-imposed quaratines for as long as 14 days.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/cdc-says-people-exposed-covid-no-longer-need-quarantine-deemphasizes-regular-testing-except
There are thousands upon thousands non’experts’ that came to the same conclusion on January 2020.
Heh … who is going to listen to the non’experts’?
They don’t get paid for common sense as opposed to real ‘experts’ that can knowingly go on with bullshit because it pays better.
Got through the first para and jumped to the conclusion that this was CMA.
The real question is was it done on purpose or by accident.
Judging by all the CMA going on I lean to on purpose.
My big question was CCP China responsible or just a useful idiot?
The chicoms think they are playing the glowballists. The glowballists think they are playing the chicoms. Both are correct.
What are the odds that an engineered virus accidentally escapes a chicom biowepon research facility just in time to ruin the Trump economic boom? Without which his re-election is a certainty.
Maybe that’s the documents that the Feeb’s were looking for at Maralago?
/s maybe
Excellent post Kate!
What I am observing is a full out war between educated medical professionals.
Many who support the CDC and minimize Covid 19 and others who are horrified at what is transpiring.
What is the correct name for this version of The Plague: WHO2, Wu2, Wu Two Redux or Who Knew ?
One of my degrees is in Mathematics from the University of Waterloo and some of my classmates went on to become world-class cryptography researchers.
Given what we know the NSA, DCA and CSIS do with regards to cryptography – they hoover up promising cryptography post-docs and criminals, and not always voluntarily – I’m not surprised in the slightest by these allegations. Cryptography researchers routinely note that the government likely has codebreakers far beyond what the academic community believes is even possible. I expect the same to be true for bioweapons labs.
Some people are getting close to catching up.
Could it be that the Wuhan lab and the 46 US biolabs in the Ukraine have a common thread?