36 Replies to “Jacinda Trudeau Call Your Office”

  1. I’m 63, unvaccinated, I had the original variant in March 2020…really sick with high fever for 7 days in bed.
    Got omicron last fall, very mild, could still function.
    I’m immune baby! It’s a God given thing.

    F Bill Gates and Fauci along with the WEF

    1. Sounds like you had a nasty flu in 2020 and caught a cold in 2021. I’m not buying this twice/thrice shit. Until there are real substantiated tests that absolutely prove someone has caught the same virus, it’s all garbage. There are none as of today. Why? Well you know why.

    2. Well that’s nice. I don’t want to rain on your parade, but I’m older than you and I personally know (not a friend of a friend, or uncle, or cousin, or distance relative), but actually know 5 people, two of whom are close to our family that died of Covid. Original one, and one Delta.

      Wife was allergic to the shot and her husband, like you said ‘I’m immune baby, it’s a God given thing’ and both died from daughter coming home from working at a Seniors home here in Calgary.

      The other one was a family who for religious reasons didn’t get the shot. Wife went into a coma, and while she was being airlifted to Edmonton, her husband and Mother-in-law died.

      Our other 80 yr old friends got the shot and just recently got covid as they deal/minister to a lot of broken homes/families, but survived. Would they have survived without the shot?

      My 93yr old Father-in-law got 2 shots and is doing well.

      Just be thankful you lived, but tone down the retort.

      1. The died from a flu virus. What underlying medical conditions did they have. 99.8% of everyone that supposedly gets “covid” survives. The shots are freaking deadly. They have killed tens of thousands and those who seemingly have no serious effects have two to five years to experience them. You are the lab rats. A little knowledge would not be remiss in Canada. If a test was the way “covid” was diagnosed, then the flu or the common cold tests as “covid”.
        There are no mutations as the “original” virus, supposedly sars-cov-2 has never been isolated and purified. There is no legitimate vaccine.

  2. It will be interesting to see if one of the narcissistic WEF robots turns on Pharma, as off script as it would be. The buck tooth hag from New Zealand might be the one, she is so in love with herself, the thought of being beaten at the polls would crush her soul. Her only chance of political survival would be the claim the “Vexx” was a fraud and Pharma lied, perhaps if it gets bad enough her only chance of physical survival. This may be their undoing, they are all cowards in the end.

    1. She won a landslide election last year, I think, so she and her fawning media have several more years in which to shamelessly lie about things before she needs re-election again.

      As to the W.E.F., I’d sooner trust the W.W.F. for advice at present…!!!

  3. Hmmm,
    So my recent, innocuous, reply to RedPop was “moderated “, then deleted.
    What’s up?
    I have not previously seen such a moderation message in italics, alerting me that my comment was under review, before, on this site, nor do I understand why I would be censored.
    This ain’t the CBC, is it?

  4. WTF is up with the CBC style moderation here.????

    SPlain to me sasa..Just posted a comment – Gone like wind..??

    1. I had one deleted here yesterday. It was posted to Francsico’s “Your Daily Dose of Deena” thread.

  5. Sounds like some technical difficulties originating at the station…?
    Yes….I am that old.
    I was surprised to see so few comments responding to this story.
    Let’s see if my comment sneaks thru the “moderator”.
    Is KM around tonight?

  6. Take a look at the stats here:

    https://www.health.govt.nz/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-data-and-statistics/covid-19-case-demographics

    Notice something? The totally unvaccinated make up about 19% of the hospitalizations while making up 6% of the adult population.

    Why then do the unvaccinated have so few cases if so many are hospitalized? A likely explanation is that COVID cases statistics are based on self reporting, and the unvaccinated are rarely bothering to have themselves tested if they feel poorly.

    1. Oh…your ears must have been ringing!
      How do you know what unvaccinated are doing?
      I can generalize too: vaccinated fell for the fear porn so they are continually testing in their paranoia.
      That was easy.

      On another note, as we have been saying all along ‘cases’ (over testing) do not mean illness.

      1. “How do you know what unvaccinated are doing?”

        I don’t with certainty. That’s why I said “A likely explanation” rather than “Without a doubt”.

        Anything more I can help you with?

          1. Yep. One of the more obvious points about the The Daily Skeptic article is the failure to consider why the infection data might be what it is.

    2. I ever I should contract the flu claimed to be Covid, I would certainly not report it or get tested. Why feed fake data to those lying bast**ds.

      1. Agree!!!
        The numbers are skewed by the paranoid victims of fear porn, testing every time they go out the door. No symptoms , just devotion to the new religion and following the the rituals.

    3. “Why then do the unvaccinated have so few cases if so many are hospitalized?”
      Because getting a jab and then hospitalized within 2-4 weeks is counted as an unvaccinated hospitalization, when the fact is the jab itself caused the hospitalization.

      1. Nice theory, except…

        1. These are recent hospitalizations. Few people are getting their first vaccination now. People either first got vaccinated in 2021, or they are avoiding vaccination altogether. Thus very few recently vaccinated people count as “unvaccinated”.

        2. There is no statistical evidence that vaccinations are causing a significant number of hospitalizations. I’ve heard a lot of anecdotal claims made on the internet, but they aren’t worth a rat’s butt.

        https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110475

        3. Whatever the risks of the vaccines, they are incapable of giving people COVID.

          1. Same with those “vaxxed” who magically contracted the virus shortly after being jabbed & didn’t get hospitalized. Our youngest, who was diagnosed positive less than a week after her first jab and her best friend, two months later, same thing, same time period, as just two examples.

          3. A research colleague was always looking to the day that he could add a “Letter to Nature” to his cv tally. Didn’t happen.

            I remind him that now that gives him added scientific status

          4. KM:
            Your posts are just an unending stream of argumentum ad verecundiam logical fallacies.
            I posted official info from state sources.
            Again, you can give yourself any title you like, you have no understanding of statistical methodologies.

    4. Notice something else?

      100% of the deaths linked to the vaccination… are linked to the vaccination.

      This is the point. Get a sniffle and get told to go home and treat yourself with off the shelf cold and flu products? You have COVID and deserve it because you are not fully jabbed.
      Have an ‘Adverse Event’ after the Jab? Yeah, whatever.

      You cannot report these things in isolation. This is base level Risk Reduction. If side effects/adverse events make the problem worse, then maybe, just MAYBE your solution is bollocks.

      The question is not solely ‘does the Jab keep people from getting COVID level hospital?’ it is ‘Do the benefits of the Jab give an over well improvement in a persons health when taking into account ALL linked effects’. That is how you are meant to investigate safety issues. You can NOT just say something without looking at the big picture.

      Example? Placing people completely underwater is an effective way of lowering core body temperature in the case of heat exhaustion. Ergo this is something you should do if you ever find someone with heat stress.

      What about them drowning? No important, because fully immersion in water is still a very effective method of treating heat stress.

      We deserve better.

      We deserve to see proper studies showing lost time due to Jab Adverse Reactions and compared honestly to lost time due to the actual Fauci Flu.

      Remember – As Far As Is Reasonably Practical exists for a reason.

      1. “100% of the deaths linked to the vaccination… are linked to the vaccination.”

        There are no verified deaths due to vaccination. That’s not saying they don’t occur, but if they do they must be very rare. Hospitalizations due to the vaccine are also rare, despite some outlandish claims. The dangers of the vaccines have been grossly overstated on many sites.

    5. This,

      Twice possibly since xmas. the first It felt coldish, the 2nd time A bit fluey, with lots of aches and pains. The first time I am pretty sure I caught it off someone who tested positive, the second I passed it too that same person and they tested positive again. But neither time did I bother getting tested. Both times I felt sick for a day and not well for perhaps a week. ie cough and sneezing and restless sleep.

  7. It’s an interesting factoid, the 6x number, but I’m not sure it implies what we the unvaccinated believe it does.

    Put simply, if 86% of the total population were fully vaxxed and Omigodicron infected the Pure and Unclean equally, you’d expect a 6x reporting rate for the vaccinated: 86/14 = 6.1. Canada has vaccinated numbers over 80% so this impacts us.

    That’s just elementary statistics and not indicative of anything. Even if it were 10x more for the vaxxed then you’d have to dig deeper and eliminate confounding data (like more frightened vaxxed people getting tested vs unvaxxed, as noted wisely above) before proclaiming the vaccines are making people more susceptible to the virus.

    As noted often, the key statistic is the death rate with vaxxed vs unvaxxed and the stats show in people >60 the highest mortality is those with double shots (significantly) followed by those with 1 or 0 shots and then the triple shotters. But again: what’s the real underlying data? What’s the truth? The article states that maybe some of those with 2 shots were too sick for a 3rd jab, and that impacts 2 of the 3 groups. Most glaringly, of course, is the rank dishonesty by the medical community in adding the numbers who died from other causes WITH covid to those who died FROM covid. That’s one of the biggest deceits in reporting since Day One.

    Both the pro-freedom and pro-vax sides will spin the data in the best way to make their case; i doubt the true numbers will ever be known in our lifetime. And it doesn’t matter a damn to the Petrified Ones who mask up when walking or driving alone: they are sheep that demand to be herded by Big Government.

    And although it’s easy to say “that’s THEIR choice” – and it is – they are a significant voting bloc who can usher in more tyranny because “safety”; and that should scare everyone.

    mhb23re

    1. As far as I’m concerned, anyone who thinks that helmet laws, DUI checkpoints, seat-belt laws, smoking laws, drug laws, and a host of others are justified are essentially scared sheep demanding to be herded.
      But here we are, a population scared of its own shadow.

    2. Your point would be valid, except the data is per 100,000 not overall totals, so it is already adjusted for cohort size.

      1. Not sure I understand your point. I’m not talking discrete numbers, I’m talking rates. Whether the ratio is per 100,000, per million or per mol, it makes no difference as long as you use the same basis: the denominators cancel. You can’t use actual numbers unless they are included in the same sample size. Even using percentages based on large variation in base size isn’t entirely kosher: if rate X was based on a population of 1000 and rate Y was based per 100K or million you’d have less accuracy with the former than the latter.

        Look at the first graph (#covid cases since Feb/22) around the 1/3/22 mark. By rough eyeball approximation there are 600 cases amongst those with 2 jabs and roughly 50 for those with none, both per 100,000 pop. That ratio is 600/50 or 12x more for the vaxxed. It’s only for one point in time and not the entire curve; you’d have to sum the numbers between points of interest for that.

        Sorry to go off topic or if i misread your post. But I think their presentation of the data is correct, it’s just the source and validity I have an issue with.

  8. No age correction? Or binning?

    Here’s the one interesting number:

    0.0585% Case Fatality

    Seasonal flu is around 0.1%

  9. You might not be seeing this in your own part of the world, but NZ tourism are trying to flog to the gullible that NZ is now “open” again.

    One – we have heard this before

    Two – New Zealand exists on sheep, hobbits and tourists. Hobbits left to Amazon. Without those sweet tourism cash coming in the economy is seriously up the septic tank. The population knows this. This is why they had riots.

    NZ – They are a basket case. If it wasn’t for the All Blacks we would throw rocks at them.

  10. Well, all I have to say is that I’m treating SOME of the “vax bad” reports with the same degree of skepticism I give to ALL government Wuhan flu propaganda. 🙂

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation