Cardiology Advisor- ACS Risk Biomarkers Significantly Increase After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine
The risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) significantly increased in patients after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, according to a report presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2021, held from November 13 to 15, 2021.
The PULS Cardiac Test measures multiple protein biomarkers, including hepatocyte growth factor [HGF], soluble Fas, and IL-16, and uses the results to calculate a 5-year risk score for new ACS. The PULS score increases with above-normal elevation. All participants received this test every 3-6 months for 8 years.
That sounds like one heck of a good base line to start from.
As a result, the 5-year ACS PULS risk score increased from 11% to 25%. By the time the report was published, changes had persisted for 2.5 months or more after the second vaccine dose.
The study author concluded that “mRNA [vaccines] dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
Emphasis mine
Some more on ACS or “acute coronary syndrome” .
There seems to be quite a bit of overlap between the risk factors for ACS and the comorbidities associated with covid.
It frustrates me how much the cardiac impacts from the vaccine have been minimized. If we can see clinical effects like myocarditis sometimes, shouldn’t we assume there are less easily detected effects more frequently? The complete lack of curiosity among those creating vaccine policy is creating significant potential for long term problems.
Its not the absence of curiosity, it is the presence of evil.
Nice try at whitewashing, though.
Bingo!
Evil upon evil heaped on top of evil.
mRNA tech is not gene therapy, but it does get our cells to manufacture spike proteins INSIDE our cells, where they have to escape from (often by damaging the cells) before an immune response can even theoretically take place.
Dr. Malone, the inventor and person holding the various patents for mRNA vaccines, has said they are gene therapy and has warned of multiple side effects especially in the vascular system. He had a podcast up but it has been removed by YouTube, its getting difficult to search for information when the censors are so heavy handed. Here is a tweet he sent out about a traditional vaccine instead of the genetic ones;
“Novavax COVID vaccine. A “traditional” vaccine for those wary of the gene vaccines (mRNA, adenovirus vectored). And an active control group to compare safety signals between vaccine types for evidence-based medicine fans. #Science #VAERS #Transparencyhttps://t.co/hjdrQpNQht
They aren’t even a vaccine under the old definition but a prophyatic treatment to reduce the strain on the medical system, which is probably why they were approved.
— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) June 15, 2021”
One big word: Reverse transcriptase.
Not gene therapy.
You are just a state mouthpiece, at best.
It is deliberate legal obfuscation: “EU Commission Directive 2009/120/ECstates: ‘Gene therapy medicinal products shall not include vaccines against infectious diseases'”. They are classified as ‘Gene Therapy’ when used for the treatment of cancer but not so when used for the treatment of infectious disease even though are the same thing – mRNA. From the NIH: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27987152/).
You may think they are not the same thing, but you are being duped………
The drugs are doing what you say they aren’t?
No reverse transcriptase, which is needed to write mRNA content into ones genes=not a gene therapy.
I foresee..
The “vaccines” worked..Because these persons did not die of Covid.
The utter arrogance of the stupid and evil is their hallmark.
“Of course this vaccine works and it is perfectly safe in the long term”.
With absolutely no way of knowing either.
I shall make sure my guillotine has a nicked and rusty blade and a brake.
Yep, and even if mRNA and viral vector vaccines didn’t cause so many immediate disabilities and deaths…short term success does not guarantee long term success or safety. From medical history:
The orbital lobotomy worked perfectly, the patient was cured of mental illness
Thalidomide worked great, it cured pregnant women of morning sickness
Vioxx was a a complete success, it releived the pain for those with rheumatoid arthritis
“I shall make sure my guillotine has a nicked and rusty blade and a brake.”
No need to sink to their levels. A simple bullet is enough.
Bullets cost money and may not always be available.
In this day and age of massive inflation I would prefer the guillotine.
Reusable, reliable, deadly accurate, just rinse and repeat.
A buck or two for a man’s life? Gimme a break.
The very idea of efficiency in killing people is an obscenity.
BOOM!!! I, for one, tend to believe the American Heart Association. Send this out, far and wide.
Off topic:
All that shit I did and continues to do adds up. I’ve been a factory worker, a chicken processor, a telecom worker, a construction worker, an IT guy, and a maintenance man for all kinds of shit, and I still am.
There is that which makes the world better, and that which does not.
More off topic:
My landlord is increasing the rent, the evil capitalist that he is, except that he should us tenants how he’s losing money, with receipts, bills, etc. The man showed us his papers!
Best landlord ever, even though a couple tenants who make more than me don’t wanna play.
“When the lights go down, its time to light the fuse.”
-Triumph.
J & J is more or less deadly than the mRNA? I don’t see data separated out anywhere?
Viral vector is an older technology than mRNA, and J & J is at least not like Moderna with a single product and won’t exist in five years.
I know people who have had both, which ones don’t get a loan from me?
The problem is not the technology; it’s what the technology instructs your body to do. Both technologies have the same end-goal: instruct your cells to produce an antigen that will elicit production of antibodies. It just happens that the antigen (SARS-CoV-2 spike-like protein) is as much of a toxin as the real thing, and is as much as a target for your immune system as the real thing. And if your endothelial cells (like those in blood vessels) are expressing the toxin, these cells are likely to be targeted by the immune system. So, both mRNA and viral vector shots can lead to the same undesirable outcomes. IF I WERE A MEDICAL DOCTOR (which I am not), I would direct my patient to a traditional vaccine (which may NOT be available….)
Dr. John Campbell has a new one up today for November 21
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7XeW8cCf3Y