47 Replies to “Transgenderism Is A Stalking Horse For The Normalization Of Pedophilia.”

  1. Maybe. Or maybe they’re just scraping the bottom of the barrel looking for more “victims” to parade in front of cameras.

    The Left has always been a place for diddlers and abusers to hide. So easy to blend in with all the other trash, right?

    1. ^100%. Losers, addicts, parasites and predators of all stripes, hell yes. All looking for someone to blame for their shitty lives and expecting compensation for it and, down the road a bit – lionization. Society’s REAL heroes, the fuckup class, so cross our palms with silver!

      I feel – I pray – that we’re all on a very short fuse now. Don’t ever let them say they weren’t warned.

        1. All for defund the police. Sheriffs too. Couple of years.

          Meanwhile, justice done good and hard.

        3. @John: The article shows a pictures obviously that of a man and yet refers to the molester as a ‘she’. At the very least, the molester should have been described as an ‘it’. FFS!! Shoot me now.

    1. “From my perspective, there is no morality or immorality attached to attraction to anyone because no one can control who they’re attracted to at all. …”

      OK then … so if I am attracted to a college cheerleader … I cannot be “blamed” for following her home to her apartment, and raping her … because I cannot control who I’m attracted to …??

      Here we are again. Right back in the church of “moral relativism”. In this case … this subhuman says: “You can’t impose YOUR Christian morals upon me!”. “There is NO morality or immorality”. This is the terminal conclusion of “moral relativism” … there is NO right or wrong. And to make an even more dire observation … because of “moral relativism” … we are allowing criminals to go free and excuse their criminal activity based on their “need”. Shoplifters are now allowed a daily “need” of $960.00 worth of stuff. Scot Free. The foundation of our civilization … our Justice system is being severely undermined … and will soon topple our Nation.

      Be careful embracing what … “sounds” … compassionate. It usually isn’t. Instead, THINK like a chess player … two, three, and more moves AHEAD of what seems expedient in the moment.

      1. // “From my perspective, there is no morality or immorality attached to attraction to anyone because no one can control who they’re attracted to at all. …”

        OK then … so if I am attracted to a college cheerleader … I cannot be “blamed” for following her home to her apartment, //

        If you just told us you were attracted, should we put you away? You make the analogy.
        People who treat pedophiles are always trying to get people to distinguish the “orientation” and actual sexual abuse of children.
        The term “pedophile” gets used for both and also people get called pedophile for hooking up with 17 year olds. [Prince Edward]
        At least the term “attraction” doesn’t cause confusion.

      1. For example: Chris Ingvaldson, his buddy from college and colleague at West Pt. Grey Academy!

  5. Of course, it is. However … HATERS and RACISTS! Don’t you dare try to stop the slide down the slippery slope to ruination and perdition. While we’re at it, on Tucker the other night, someone snidely suggested that we start calling murderers, People Who Expedite the Demise of Another*. Good one!
    *Sorry, I may have paraphrased.

    1. Or “LAiD”. Layman assistance in death. Maybe if the day comes I am forced to off a leftist or a paedophile, that is how I will explain it.

  6. MAPs are roughly where homosexuals were around 1969.

    Although things are moving quickly these days.

    1. The Pedos keep trying to manipulate their way into acceptability. When gay rights activism started they immediately attached themselves onto that movement and tried to legitimize themselves with man/boy “love” (excuse me while I gag). The mainstream gay rights activists soon ejected them. Seeing them now latch onto transgenderism and try to get access to children that way is to be entirely expected given past history. Virtually every aspect about the transgender movement has this element of legitimizing the sexualization of children and getting transgender types near children.

      Transgender pedos are creepy enough all on their own. However I often wonder how many so called transgender women are actually men who are adopting it to get ahead. I mean a white straight male is at a serious disadvantage in our society but if he puts on a dress and some dangly earrings all kinds of doors open up in the name of diversity.

    2. Nailed it.

      Ask anyone back in the late 60s if same sex marriage would be a thing, and I mean anyone, you would have been laughed out of the room. Even a person of that persuasion would never have imagined it.

      So when you hear someone say that normalization of pedophilia will never happen, don’t count on it.

      1. The first big victory was having it even considered as fitting the definition of marriage. Orwell predicted all this. First change the meaning of words.

  8. Trying to add ‘p’ to the alphabet soup.

    I just call them QWERTY people now. I figure eventually they’ll get to all the letters of the alphabet.

    2. Think positive: at least you can spot them from a distance and avoid them. The normal-looking crazies are more sinister as you might be tempted to engage with them before you find out what they are all about.

    3. They adopt that child-like goofy look to better blend in with their prey. Which wolf gets into the flock of sheep more easily? One who looks like a fellow sheep or one who looks like big bad wolf?

    1. The other day, I received a weekly newsletter from one professional association I’m registered with. In it was an article about a certain university professor, describing how he was going out to celebrate a birthday with his husband.

      I stopped reading at that point, asking myself why I needed to know that.

  11. Minor attracted person (7 syllables) is soft language (George Carlin) for pervert (only 2 syllables). The purpose of soft language is obfuscation, to distract from the truth. Pedophiles, whatever you call them, are people with perverted moral codes. I do not have to use their language and I do not have to tolerate their behaviors.

  12. Contemporary rendition of the book of Genesis: “I’m a trans-averse hetero-attracted non- woman seeking trans-averse hetero-attracted non-man for companionship and procreation. Call me, or see my Agent.”

  15. Somewhere, a pro-family activist is putting his feet up on his desk and thinking: “I told everyone that this would happen”.

    Also, today is the anniversary of Jim Jones’ disastrous happy hour in Guyana. He was a creep who everyone found trendy, too.

  16. I know I’ve posted this before but I’m going to do it afresh for those who may have missed out. Some time back when he still had his blog, a notorious conservative writer of histories of pop music told me in a private email that he was certain he would see the normalization of pedophilia in his lifetime.

    About a year after that, I learned that Michelle Foucault and Jaques Derrida, the fathers (if that’s a word we’re still allowed to use) of postmodern thought, were highly vocal defenders of pedophiles and pedophilia, to the point of circulating a petition among their “intellectual“ peers to be submitted to the government of France. Signatories included Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir.

    The funny thing about the left is that they’re really very simple-minded and predictable. If you can think of any issue in modern society where morality is going to be pitted against predatory behavior, the left will always come down on the side of the predators. Yuri Bezmenov spoke decades ago of the KGB‘s use of demoralization to unhinge and weaken an entire society.

    This is where we are at; it’s war.

    EDIT: something just occurred to me: basically the left are the equivalent of at best some predatory nomadic tribe and at worst, relict Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons. They embody humanity before morality was invented.

    Just riffing, but feels right.

    1. If I truly posted my real thoughts about pedophiles , Kate would have to ban me forever.
      So I shall remain silent, if you could see me, I be the one with steam blowing out my ears.

  17. Nobody thought what men in dresses wanted would blow every other consideration – free speech and women’s rights, etc – completely away , but here we are.
    Pedophiles are lowest of the low, but give it twenty years of Overton Window movement and we will have to watch every word we say around these pieces of shit.

  19. Well if we are replacing titles how about we switch ‘University Professor’ with ‘convicted sex offender’?

    Just an idea.

    Also, ffs, what does the word ‘pedophile’ actually mean? Something like ‘person who is sexually attracted to minors’?

    (technically it is attracted to a certain age group which – without researching – I believe to be 0-8 years old. So a Ped is not JUST attracted to minors, but attracted to VERY YOUNG minors.)

    So this Uni prat is basically saying “hey, why don’t we replace a word that is recognised to mean something, with the full description that still basically means exactly the same thing?”

    What next from these mental powerhouses? Replace the word ‘shirt’ with ‘fabric clothing item worn over the arms and torso?’

    Idiot.

    (sorry, ‘Person who was highly likely to have been dropped on their head as a child… and youth… and teen… and adult’)

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation