52 Replies to “Wuhan Flu: The Vaccines Formerly Known as Prince”

    2. Yes. That is, Comirnaty is a bait-n-switch. Comirnaty is FDA approved, but unavailable.

      The new brand names are for the commercial, approved variants, but what people are actually still getting are the variants under emergency use license, with the false implication that they are fully FDA approved.

    3. Not a bait-and-switch. Same drugs, same pharmacological formulas, strictly a marketing issue.

      The third tweet in the above HC/PHAC Twitter thread reads: “(3/4) These are only name changes. There are no changes to the vaccines themselves.”

      Pfizer doesn’t have secret parallel drug manufacturing facilities that are tooled to churn out “FDA-/HC-approved” vaccines separate from facilities churning out EUA-approved vaccines.

      1. They are the same formulation but with distinct legal liability… EUA version comes with zero liability for adverse reactions, while the FDA approved version has limited liability. You might be able to sue for damages if you die from Comernity, but not if you get Pfizer. When people say it’s a bait and switch, we’re talking about the liability implications of announcing FDA approval, and then still putting Pfizer in people’s arms using EUA.

        2. “When people say it’s a bait and switch, we’re talking about the liability implications of announcing FDA approval, and then still putting Pfizer in people’s arms using EUA.”

          Yeah, and that’s wrong. There is no difference in liability between the EUA version and the fully licensed version of Pfizer, due to the (Trump administration’s) invocation of the PREP Act in the early days of the pandemic. Even the guy who started this misinformation — Dr. Robert Malone, in a conversation with Steve Bannon on August 24th — has since retracted his original claims: twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1432325367591809027

          The worse news for you is that this means that the FDA-approved version of Pfizer also enjoys a liability shield, just as the EUA version did.

      2. As James pointed out, it IS a bait-and-switch. It doesn’t matter if the formulas are identical – the FDA made the legal distinction clear. When you get the EUA vaccine, if you experience a crippling side effect (like the man who lost both legs, one of his arms, and three fingers on the other arm from the clots it caused), they can just shrug and say ‘oh well, sucks to be you’.

        As you might imagine, that’s why they’re not actually producing the version they’d be liable for.

  2. VAXZILLA! I like it. Have these people nothing better to do; I guess they need a little relaxation after a hard day’s defending of the populace from a relatively minor virus for most people

  3. They’re barely competent to run their own.

    Keep in mind most of them have been drunk by lunchtime every day for the last 18 months, having been relieved of the responsibility of showing up somewhere sober every day, never mind doing anything productive when they get there.

    That’s why their children are being sent back to school while they continue to “work from home.” Mommy has drinking to do. The kids get in the way.

  4. Same bovine excrement, different name and now with FDA approval so that a vaccine mandate will have legal teeth – you must be vaccinated with Vaxrement or else! That means that FDA approval means absolutely nothing (as most here have long suspected).

  7. Is anybody familiar with Newspeak?
    They will change it again as soon as those terms become less palatable to the proletariat.

  9. They know the vaccines are as useless as the P in Pfizer so they’re juicing up the labels for the kids.

    1. Way to miss the entire point of the story. I’d try to explain it to you, but I figure you’re too stupid to understand.

        2. Wowser wowy wow wow wow.
          antif spelled backwards is fitna.
          I mean just wow , wow ,……….wow.
          Wow.
          Way to rebrand yourself.
          Wow.

        3. antics, The point of the story was to mislead bots into thinking there is an assurance of safety.
          You lie to us with the intent of endangering our health. How much are you being paid?

  12. Why would all of them be changing their names at once? This makes no sense. Also the FDA approval for the Pzier-Biotech one is meaningless. Everyone knows they do not have long-term safety data. Just bizarre that people could accept all of this without questioning anything.

  13. All three drug names are of course awkward and meaningless, but blame the Brand Institute: https://www.brandinstitute.com/covidexperience.html. They’re the one’s responsible for coming up with brand and generic names for the majority of new pharma products.

    National government departments and regulatory agencies have nothing to do with naming decisions, thought the WHO plays a role in shaping the naming of generic (non-proprietary) drug names, to promote standard drug formulations across countries and manufacturers and to prevent errors in drug prescribing and dispensing.

  15. They are not rebranding. They are unbranding.
    Removing the company name from their hugely successful ($) treatments.
    What is coming down the pipe that they would want to do that?

  16. Completely unsurprising. FDA, HC et al simply wouldn’t dare NOT issue the approvals after millions of peoples went & got jabbed.

    The big thing now, as pointed out upthread, is that this likely removes a legal barrier to giving employment vaccine mandates teeth. And just wait until the boosters start rolling out, which I’d bet will start in the winter. Jab #3 or unemployment, your “choice”.

  17. Does this mean that we can watch overly produced commercials from Big Pharma for the COVID Slayers™ with the new fancy names? And will they come with the 30 second rambling of the side effects at the end? Like they have for all their other problem mitigating “Drugs”.

  21. ..”.too stupid to be running our lives.” How about too stupid to have anything then a government job….too stupid to breath (thank goodness for them it’s an automatic function)…… . Feel free to add more, I’m sure the list could be long.

    1. nice to see someone, anyone is catching up to what I have been saying for a very long time. You may never have read a single post of mine, yet here you are, actually saying the same things.

  23. I believe this has to do with the Interim Order for the vaccines having expired today, Sept 16. In March of this year it looks like the government transitioned the process for experimental vaccines under the Food and Drug Regulations. I don’t have a full grasp on what this means but I’m sure there’s some shenanigans going on.
    Guaranteed this wasn’t done for our benefit.

    https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/drugs-vaccines-treatments/interim-order-import-sale-advertising-drugs.html

  29. The approval is a fraud. And a distraction.
    As LindaL and others have pointed out, it can’t be meaningfully approved with no long term data.

    ALSO, any approval is irrelevant to the central issue of a mandated gene therapy: Submitting to COERCION in not CONSENT.
    And of course without the long term trials we can’t be INFORMED.

    See how clever the distraction is!?

  30. 90’s Bro Code Slogan inbound.

    SpikeVax to the RxTreme.
    SpikeVax Immunity to the Max!!!

    Makes me feel caffeinated TO THE RXTTREME

  31. You have to know that Vaxeveriaeiiavulva sounds like something Papa Joe mumbled before they cut off his Mike.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation