A Donor A Day Keeps The Court Losses Away

Blacklocks: Attorney General David Lametti in a single day appointed four Liberal Party donors as judges. The flurry of appointments Friday came three weeks after the Commons justice committee rejected an investigation of Party vetting of judges: “I am confident they will serve the people.”

17 Replies to “A Donor A Day Keeps The Court Losses Away”

  1. I sure hope they are all Australians, for the Kangaroo Kourts in this Kuntry, Kanaduh.

  2. What would we do without Blacklock, since we don’t have an independent media in this country.

  3. The idiot moron Harper appointed all liberals who overturned absolutely every law he passed. Party membership should be the only criteria for a Conservative PM.

  4. “I am confident they will serve the people.”

    I’m reminded of a comment made by H. G. Wells. He said if an alien race was to land and say they came to serve us, perhaps the response to that should be “Boiled or fried?”

  5. AG Lametti is one corrupt sleazeball. Needless to say, the paid-and-bought-for corporate media will look the other way. Lamenting gets away with everything.

  6. To be a judge you don’t even have to be a failed lawyer. Your appointment is based on your skills at raising funds for the Liberal Party. Actual knowledge and skill in the law will likely go against you.

    1. Juthtin’s Dad, Pegger Pierre, got back his majority in his 3rd election after spending like a maniac as well. As much as its funny to say he’s Fidel’s spawn, Juthtin truly has followed in his unholy father’s footsteps.
      A third term, a 2nd majority, Juthtin and the Liberals will go on attack mode.

  7. The judiciary is only as good as the Constitution they purport to uphold and in the deranged dominion that means that they can be subjectively mercurial, defaulting to their conflicted interests. It’s one of the very few legitimate functions of the state but given our existing leviathan of governance, the role of the judiciary can be more influential than parliament. Given the two alternatives of either crony appointment or being elected to office (as in some US courts), limiting the scope of government or having a real constitution (but I repeat myself) are the only way to constrain judicial activism. Raising the political I.Q. of the citizenry would help but socialized education and its societal wreckage has sealed that fate for a generation or two.

  8. Yeah …
    The corruption in this country is fully functional and appreciated by many, possibly majority of the proletariat, with the support of the corruptors that are the 97.25% of politicians.
    It is so because it’s nary impossible for the 2.75% to get a word in edgewise, heh … as the saying goes.

  9. Such officials are essential to the operation of a Kleptocracy.
    Thieves and Bandits wrote those laws..
    Corrupt grubbers enforce them.
    Enjoy the decline.
    We will not become independent nor Separate without a fight.
    Fools,Bandits and Parasites never voluntarily stop their actions.
    For those who insist we behave”Lawfully”,the question is whose laws?
    What is “lawful?”,when you live in a corrupt nation?

  10. There’s an ominous path ahead for Canada. The politicians and bureaucracy have been captured by self-destructive wokism, but the country lacks the corrective mechanisms that you see in America. Judges aren’t vetted, the Senate is a rubber stamp, the provinces have little power and there are few constitutional protections against government expansion.

    It will be touch and go in the US but I think they’re emerging from the worst of it, led by states like Texas and Florida. Not sure how this ends in Canada. Apart from Maxime Bernier and Pierre Polliviere, who is out there to stop it?

Navigation