Hug Your Father While You Still Can

Party of Exclusion;

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Rules Committee Chairman James McGovern (D-MA) unveiled the rules for the 117th Congress on Friday, which contain “future-focused” proposals, including the elimination of gendered terms, such as “father, mother, son, and daughter.”
 
“This package, which will be introduced and voted on once the new Congress convenes, includes sweeping ethics reforms, increases accountability for the American people, and makes this House of Representatives the most inclusive in history,” said the House Committee on Rules in a statement.

43 Replies to “Hug Your Father While You Still Can”

    1. Do these new gender-neutral rules mean I can’t refer to Pelosi as a “stupid c*nt” anymore?

  1. Saw this:

    “Anyone who says awoman after saying amen is amoron.”

    ” includes sweeping ethics reforms”?
    Like not holding up aid packages for political gain?

  2. This is one occasion in which I won’t censor my language, but what the bloody hell?

  3. You know I am starting to feel like George Carlin did, angry. Is everyone out there an idiot.

  4. The soft tranny of nihilism has migrated from college campuses to the Democrat-controlled congress. If it weren’t already a sewer of psychopaths’, that might tend to lower its moral standing.

  5. Reminds me of Fonzie wearing his black leather jacket…while water skiing and headed for the jump…

  6. The NP’s Rex Murphy, in his column on this, makes the point that the very first words babies say are “momma” and “dadda”. Send them all to the re-education camps I say!

  7. “includes sweeping ethics reforms, increases accountability for the American people, and makes this House of Representatives the most inclusive in history*”

    note the newspeak, the package will do none of those things

  8. I am less and less inclined to get worked up about this kind of patent nonsense. It gains little or no traction with the general public and just provides more ammo for the people’s utter contempt for gubmint, MSM, and academia all of which are are slipping precipitously in public esteem.

    Also users of this kind of language marks them as “to be avoided at all costs”. e.g. the word “fishers” for fishermen.

    1. Also users of this kind of language marks them as “to be avoided at all costs”. e.g. the word “fishers” for fishermen.

      Not in Canada. They’re called “fisherfolk”, at least according to one Liberal MP.

        1. A fisher is a Mustelid found in the boreal forest, circumpolar distribution. When their pelts get turned into coats, we call them sable. Yer welcome.

        2. Every time some dolt (and I used to work for Thomson Reuters, where they were thick on the ground) uses the term “fishers” to describe a fisherman or woman, I like to remind them that a fisher is a large member of the weasel family that eats squirrels, and not someone who catches codfish for a living, and that other members of the weasel family include politicians and “journalists” and people who try to make the English language reflect their own leftard biases and delusions. That usually was enough to make them go and try to spread their flatulence elsewhere.

  9. Well. You understand that each of the Democrats had, at most, a parent with male sexual organs whose services as a sperm donor were enlisted at some point in the past.

    If they’d actually had fathers they’d be Republicans.

    1. As a robot Pelosi had neither, which is why she’s so comfortable with eliminating the terms. Smash the zombie robots! Resistance is NOT futile!

  10. This reminds me of legislative agendas past.

    Example one- the distinct society clause which English Canadians where told was just some window dressing that didn’t add or diminish rights but that was sold to Quebec as some kind of sacred cow that changed everything.

    Example two- the compelled speech law that makes it an offence if you don’t refer to someone by their preferred pronoun.

    Let’s also remember that motion to eliminate islamiphobia.

    It’s not what they tell you what the new rules address, it’s what they don’t.

    This isn’t a rule, it’s a new weapon to censor speakers in the House from saying things they don’t want spoken.

  11. Nancy is throwing a bone to her newfound progressive friends who voted for her to remain as speaker and all that while AOC and others campaigned on the promise that they wouldn’t unless Pelosi publicly pledged to table medicare for all. Well guess what, Pelosi refused but AOC and the rest voted for her anyways.
    LOL…political whores.

    It’s Dems eating their own, just enjoy the show while they put their mental illness on display.

  12. “…which contain “future-focused” proposals…”

    …which are already the law here in Canada. And nobody (other than Jordan Peterson) noticed, or cared, when it happened. Shiny Pony still got re-elected too. Okay?

    Conservatives are the STUPIDEST PARTY in existence. Seriously, name a bunch of sad-sacks that get pushed around and lose more than Conservatives. There aren’t any.

    1. Seriously, name a bunch of sad-sacks that get pushed around and lose more than Conservatives.

      The Toronto Maple Leafs? After all, when was the last time that team won the Stanley Cup?

      1. Heard on a flight from Calgary to Toronto: “How do you know it’s spring? The Leafs are out.” You can guess which airline.

    2. But … we’re “nazis” aren’t we? Where’d all that nice pansy pushover stuff come from?

      Conservatives don’t conserve even their ethics; traded for being liked by people ardently committed to hate them. Too nice; too foolish.

  13. L- “Live not by lies” – Alexandr Solzhenitsyn

    “Anyone who can get you to believe absurdities can get you to commit atrocities.” -Voltaire

    “They are not after me. They are after you. I’m just in the way.” Pres. Donald Trump

    The Democrats are on the offensive, very offensive, with an aim to ride roughshod over the legislation that made slavery unconstitutional.

    1. “They are not after me. They are after you. I’m just in the way.” Pres. Donald Trump

      Did he really say that? My God, THE best summary of current reality yet. So succinct and breathtakingly true it almost brings me to tears. 🙁

  14. The Republicans will just reprint this and send it out for the 2022 elections, if they have 1/2 a brain

  15. “…increases accountability for the American people…”
    Sorry, that “ship has sailed”… try a different lie next time Nancy.

  16. The next time I’m allowed in a mall I’m going to point at all the curvey mannequins and point and shout; “WOmannequin!”

    Then I’ll rip off the Mike Myers character from so I Married an Axe Murderer and speak beat poetry that ends with Woah-man-equin. I would then expect my friends to snap their fingers appreciatively.

  17. The best reply to the Amen/Awomen ridiculousness was the twitter reply:

    “I can’t wait to get home and heat up a bowl of Rawoman”

Navigation