55 Years of Failure

In his latest column, Dan Henninger details over a half century of failure of Democrat Party policies. Though his column is probably behind a paywall, he discusses it with John Batchelor here.

Simply put, all of the Democrat politicians are locked into a framework of failure. They didn’t invent these policies but did sign up to support them. Even suggesting that any of these policies be altered is a sure recipe for career suicide. The strange thing is why the protestors are demanding change from these absolute policy failures?

16 Replies to “55 Years of Failure”

  1. And burning it all down so that they can start again is an OK plan for the Democratic masterminds in their gated communities. Unless someone gives the rioters maps of where the rich Democrats live.

  2. I am not kneeling nor grovelling before racists and perverts. I’d rather die professing Christ King, than live on my knees as a slave of racists and deviants.

    To the left: FUCK YOU.

  3. I’d say 55 years of Democratic Party success are in full bloom in cities across America.

    The policies have achieved their desired and intended results.

  4. So burning the cities to the ground is Success,in Demon Rat circles.
    I wonder how long it will take their breathing voters to figure this out?
    Soon?
    Or just after Hell freezes over?

  5. The failures go back further than 55 years. At least some of it starts in 1960 with the presidency of John Kennedy. He and brother Bobby were the proponents of the Great Society mythology which was to bedevil Lyndon Johnson 1963-68. The Republican notion of dealing with Communism is a specific case. Eisenhower, wise to the limits of military power, kept the United States from intervening in Vietnam after the French defeat at Dien Bien Phu. Kennedy launched the policy of active intervention with tens of thousands of American deaths in combat, a very divided nation and a weakened US presence on a global basis. The US would not recover from any of this until Ronald Reagan.

    There was a massive hubris about the Kennedy administration and its merits or lack thereof. It was labelled Camelot as a piece of typical Hollywood sycophancy over the politics and politicians the Malibu aristocrats preferred. Remember that the musical came out in 1960 on Broadway. Much like Bill Clinton, the various forces of the left were prepared to ignore, JFK’s slumming lifestyle, gangster family background and dead Hollywood actresses who had become inconvenient. Oh, and just for laughs, also ignored was that JFK constituted a huge national security risk, both in WW2 and during his Cold War presidency.

  6. How is this different then the Indians ? They live in hell holes . They can’t own property .
    The crime rate is off the wall mostly against there own people . Maybe it is time to try something
    different like shutting down the reserves . Any money sent to individual person if they want to
    live on the reserve they pay taxes to the reserve. If they go on there own to try and better there lives
    good. Hopefully majority will do well . We know there is no future in the communist system there in now.
    It is in everyone benefit for the Indians to do well . Whats going on now hasn’t worked . The Indian people
    are hurt the worst but the problem is growing.

    1. Harvey.There is no Systemic racism in Canada,report to your Liberal re education centre immediately..
      The Canadian Apartheid system is an ugly cancer ,gifted by our Liberals and paid for by us all.
      Apart from grinding the reserve Indians into the dirt,it enriches a massive bureaucracy of progressive white persons.
      A wonderful agency designed to make taxpayer dollars divert and disappear.
      The massive irony,is the femminist phonies are just fine with Native Indian women having absolutely no rights,property or person, on Reserve.

  7. The Democrats should have PROGRESSIVES FOR A PROGRESSIVE FAILURE as their motto. They will only do that which benefits their chances of re-election.

Navigation