Our Cauliflower, Who Art In Heaven

15 Replies to “Our Cauliflower, Who Art In Heaven”

1. “His beliefs affect much of his everyday life. He will, for instance, walk rather than take a bus to avoid accidental crashes with insects or birds.”

   These people never grow up on a farm.

   1. Quick Dick needs to do a video on what gets killed during the tilling and harvesting by accident and what gets killed on purpose to assure yield.

      That said so far my 2020 predictions are sailing along well.

      Oh and Kate this title really killed me. Still laughing.

2. A new year and the stupid continues to expand exponentially.

3. Greater love has no vegan than he who presents himself a living sacrifice in place of a rodent for the purpose of product testing.

   The article also notes “a previous tribunal ruled that a strongly held belief in climate change amounted to a philosophical belief capable of protecting someone against discrimination in their employment.”. No surprise to readers of SDA.

   I expect that the rainbow coalition would also be a protected philosophy.

4. So it’s not possible that he was fired for simply being annoying? I stand corrected. Who knew that would become a protected category?

5. What do you expect from a tribunal? I’d reject any ruling coming out of one. A tribunal is a Troika. Troikas are Communist.

6. It’s no dumber than Catholicism, TBH.

7. A nut bar being fired from a nut bar organization, protected by a nut bar tribunal making up nut bar rulings within a culture becoming too stupid to survive.

   1. whal shucks John, at least there’s lotsa nuts to snack on !!!!
      ooooh, different kind of nut . . . .

8. And that is why I tell zoophiles – I.e. Vancouver Humane Society – they have no right to shove their religion down our throats.
   Then can no longer claim they’re not a religion.

9. If they are on-par with religions, then the ethical vegans can be nailed for proselytizing at work! And for oppression if they criticize meat eaters! Watch out anti-vaxxers – you can be put in the same restraints.

10. Hypothesis: Would a pack of wolves decide to eat a vegetarian/animal rights zealots, who worship them ?

    A valid scientific test of the hypothesis would have be repeatable for it to be considered valid.

    Proof of the volunteer’s DNA would be tested for in the wolf pack’s scat.

    Would the animal “rights” zealots volunteer as a “religious” duty, in which case the test may be ruled legally protected religious practice by the judiciary?

    In other news, at a press conference hosted by Barry Bear, Walter Wolf and Carla Cougar, they issued the following statements:
    1. “If Mother Nature didn’t want predatory animals to eat humans, she would not have made them out of meat. ”
    2. “Not all humans are fit to be at the top of the food chain.”

11. Holy cow! No questions asked.
    Super tribunal.
    The three little pigs could have done better.

12. While the BBC article asks, “So, for example, could a worker on a supermarket checkout refuse to put a meat product through the till?”

    I ask back, so, for example, can an applicant for employment withhold in the application process that because of their ethical beliefs they are going to refuse to carry out some tasks that are essential parts of the job and then be entitled to accommodation in the job, despite having secured employment by dishonesty? If they do disclose that they will refuse some tasks, will the employer be forced to hire them anyway by a complaint of religious discrimination?

13. Many years ago, I asked my doctor about the benefits of a meatless diet.

    He replied, ” If had something that was made of aluminum that needed repair, the first thing I’d do is get some aluminum.

    I am made out of meat.”