When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal

11 Replies to “When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal”

1. Neat, you are a racist and a bigot even if you are not. There is no escaping the catch 22 of 1984 and beyond. Socialism/communism and all on the left spectrum of politics make stuff up as they go. There never is a correct answer unless you are tuned into the code de jure and are a left wing maggot.

   1. “Franz Kafka come home – you can have your old room back.”

2. It is keeping up with the Jones. You can never be pure enough, righteous enough for the absolute, mendacious ideologue because the goal posts are always in motion. By the time you have reached the post in front of you, there is another one further out and the nearest post is passe, even if the two posts are in total contradiction (thanks to Hegel and synthesis). Power is maintained by keeping the playing field under your feet in constant motion.

   1. All tyrannies are whimsical, as the Queen of Hearts so aptly demonstrates in Alice In Wonderland. The modern left is a tyrannical outfit, bent on acquiring morenpwer to itself. It is a disease, and it is never sated, never sleeps. The day is coming when YOU will be forced to choose: join some conservative paramilitary, or live on your knees as a slave of the leftists.

3. We need more Victor Davis Hanson. He is terrific.

4. Ha, I loved his comparison of Trump arriving in elitist DC to Rodney Dangerfield’s loud and brash character shaking up the snotty clubhouse members in ‘Caddyshack’.

   Perfect.

5. Trump isn’t undoing nothing. America’s as progressive as it has been in decades.

   1. you are dumb as you were before

      you contradict yourself and are too dumb to know it

      Trump is undoing a lot, and you have complained about it in the past

      now you are saying he is undoing nothing

      the people paying you to troll here need to hire better people than you

6. It makes more sense after starting in on that. I got a few minutes in, and he said

   “they started with the presupposition that Hillary was going to win”
   “this explains why each person was willing to take on so much personal risk”
   “because they would be rewarded; Hillary was going to win”.

   That really does explain a lot; Hillary is going to win, therefore whatever questionable or illegal actions we take will be rewarded. There is no chance of this failing, because it is a mathematical certainty that Hillary will win. It is the fifth law of thermodynamics “Hillary is going to win”. If Hillary was an Avenger, Thanos would have been taken care of easily because it is Hillary, and not Thanos, that is inevitable.

   And then?

   “OH, SCHIFF!”

   Then, the butt covering just went off on ridiculous tangents. After that, panic took over; these were no longer the actions of confident people, assured of their reward and place in Valhalla. These were suddenly people who were looking at the very real possibility of punishment. People who suddenly had to start thinking “I wonder if any of my co-conspirators is wearing a wire”…

   1. That makes the obvious tactic, a simple smirk; a “we know what you did, and someone has already ratted you out” smirk.

      Because if they are willing to break their oaths of office, they are willing to sell out their friends. They already have, I am sure of it. For a sociopath and a narcissist, taking one for the “team”, is simply not in the cards.

7. Google “Peter Strzok” – About 1,840,000 results (0.52 seconds)

   Google “Joseph Pientka” – About 108,000 results (0.48 seconds)

   Any questions?