Break Them Up

Tech 33 Comments

“We searched for Tulsi Gabbard, her channel and her videos all showed up first,” Crowder claimed on his livestream. “When we switched our VPN to the United Sates … nothing.”

Update: It’s not clear why some can’t see the link above. This is an abridged version of the Steven Crowder video that the story is focused on.

33 Replies to “Break Them Up”

  1. When I follow the link, I get “An unexpected error has occurred.”

    Hillary is a powerful god!

  2. BS
    There are no algorithms that interfere with elections except those coming from Russia!
    (sarc)
    The world needs a digital bill of rights that applies to private company behaviours. True net neutrality would mean that all publisher’s content has equal access to the internet and to being revealed through search results.

    1. I’ve been thinking about doing the same. It’s tough as the batards have their tentacles in everything.

      p.s. Here is a joke I read a while ago (might even have read it here) and I tell all my friends and family. You might enjoy doing the same.
      *****************************************************************
      “Why are you whispering ?” my wife asked me at the dinner table.

      “I’m afraid the government might be listening” I said.

      She laughed.

      I laughed.

      Siri and Alexa laughed.

  4. Crowder claims a lot and knows very little. Somehow I doubt his technical expertise. For someone being ‘suppressed’, Tulsi sure is getting a lot of exposure.

    Here’s an idea: instead of telling lies about the supposed evil’s of Google and using them to justify crushing capitalism and stealing people’s stuff, make your own search engine multi-conglomerate of awesomeness.

    1. Google Assistant, is that you? How did you get in here?

      We don’t like your kind, the kind that promises honest search results to induce us to read ads and then delivers dishonest search results.

      You can’t defraud to us like that, it’s not as though you’re Hillary Clinton…uh, oh… you are Hillary, aren’t you, you killed her, stole her soul and re-animated her body, didn’t you?

        1. What a laugh you little child. Google scrubbed a certain famous video of Evelyn Farkas talking about spying on Trump. But there’s no bias. Right.

        2. unDork has a huuuge range of don’t know schitt, and keeps proving so every post in here. There have been many documented incidents of deleted videos, and shadow banning by various electronic media, Fakebook is not the only one doing these things. But unDork knows better than those who work in the industry, like my SIL and nephew, rite unDork????

          1. I have paid little attention to Crowder. Unme doesn’t like him. Therefore I will read everything he offers for at least a week.

        3. UnT

          You wouldn’t say shit if your mouth was full of it…which it most certainly is 99.995% of the time.

          Link works for me on my ’12 Macbook…

      3. We don’t like your kind, the kind that promises honest search results

        I’ll bet you a hundred dollars you can’t find any evidence that Google ever promised any such thing (not least of which because when it comes to AI-generated search results, you’re going to have to define what you mean by “honest” first).

        Google hasn’t lied to you because Google never made you any promises whatsoever, and you aren’t owed anything because you haven’t paid them a thin dime for anything.

        The world needs a digital bill of rights that applies to private company behaviours. True net neutrality would mean that all publisher’s content has equal access to the internet and to being revealed through search results.

        You don’t have a right to use someone else’s computer for free. Why is this so difficult for people to understand?

        I’m curious, are you familiar with the life story of Sir Henry Pellatt?

        1. daniel, you that out of touch, change your name to unReam,then. Because of the power digital sites have over the general public discourse there in an absolute need to make sure they are fair and honest . You some one else’s computer is bullshit BTW

    2. Do you honestly believe that any enterprise gets beyond the size of a family farm or corner store whose owners know most of their customers WITHOUT being evil?

      Do you believe that what you call “capitalism” is sustained by anything but sucking the blood of tax- and debt-peons to guarantee unimaginable wealth and power for a few thousand people?

      Or that they are not working day and night on finding ways to replace all their human drudges with robots so they can finally haul us all off to the scrapyard like the obsolete machinery that is all we will ever be to them?

      Silicon Valley’s goal is not a free enterprise system, where those willing to work productively can count on being rewarded, and where their children will have a future if they are brought up right.

      It is to replace the human proletariat with a robotic one that will make much better New Socialist Men than humans ever did.

      Such a proletariat will be much better suited to fulfilling the childish dreams of galactic conquest held by space cadets like Bezos and Musk, who should have outgrown such notions with the comic books they found them in. You? Me? We have no part to play in their space melodrama even as slaves.

    3. Unsurprisingly, being a halfwit clownshoes, you fail to notice in the article that YouTube tacitly acknowledged they had been messing around with the results.

      Keep pretending Google isn’t censoring, just because they do it in favour of the causes you support. That’s a very principled stand.

  5. Regarding Clinton’s imputations:

    // Both these accusations were made without evidence. Equally troubling is the fact that they relied on the weaselly spy-world usage of the word “asset.” A Russian asset, in secret agent lingo, can be a spy or a conscious collaborator. But the term can also refer to someone who is unwittingly promoting Russian interests and unknowingly gets Russian assistance for doing so. That assistance can take so intangible and ephemeral a form as being retweeted on Twitter. And since the “promotion” is in the eyes of the beholder, it’s a smear that can’t be defended against. //

    BUT, given the reaction:
    // The upshot of Clinton’s intervention was surely the opposite of what she intended: Tulsi Gabbard was elevated in public discourse, the beneficiary of an enormous amount of free publicity and the recipient of kind words from her rivals. Gabbard’s Twitter account gained 50,000 new followers after Clinton’s barrage. //

    In other words:
    // Clinton had made herself into Gabbard’s asset.//

    https://tinyurl.com/y6tthfrq

  6. I click on the link and get a giant screen of white.

    Google is Satan. And don’t you forget it.

  7. You would have to be mentally retarded not to have seen the changes in Google over the years. A long time ago when you googled something you got answers. Now you get adds.

  8. I use Duck Duck Go search engine and it gave me Tulsi’s stuff in both modes. I VPN to Denver, they did one from Vancouver …. no problemo. I haven’t used Google Search for two years. I do not miss it. It doesn’t deliver what I want because I am conservative.

    1. The only place where I relay on google is Youtube because unfortunately there is no substitute for this cancer. Beyond that: email, search engine, browser; there are much better alternatives not hosted by the enemy.

    2. It doesn’t deliver what I want because I am conservative.

      Can’t be. UnMe says a hard-global-Marxist website found no evidence of hard-global-Marxist skewing of search results from Google.

      How can you not trust UnMe?

      Did you know that you will immediately die from living on a more-fruitful, more-pleasant slightly-warmer planet? The Economist says so! You’d have to be crazy not to agree!

      1. I am censored and cut off constantly. I have given up worrying about it because it seems evil will rise to top no matter how much we try to keep it away.

        1. Consider that if evil regularly triumphed over good, we would never have gotten this far. The modern world would never have come into being. Good creative, motivated humans can defeat the evil, but there doesn’t seem to be enough of us anymore. And our numbers continue to shrink in a society that works hard to rid itself of ……… us.

          1. I think I am in agreement. I guess when Revelation comes to fruition all will be removed, forgiven, forgotten, altered, ummm, I see a theocracy in the offing.

  9. Bing is working very well, so I’ve been ungoogled for nearly a year now. Not sure why you’d need google for YouTube.

    1. I follow multiple channels on Youtube. Youtube belongs to Google. So how do you ungoogle and keep a Youtube account?

      1. You do not need a google account to view the clips do you? Just of you want to post or colllect …. Vids,

        1. Unfortunately you need to verify your age in order to view videos that EffYoutube deems “controversial” and to do that you need an account.

        2. I need an account to subscribe to channels. Otherwise to search my favorite channels for new content I would need to check them one by one. With an account I just go to the subscriptions page. That saves a lot of time.

          But that is beside the point, Youtube belongs to Google. Using Youtube (with or without subscription) is using Google.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation