36 Replies to “Speaking of Leftist Cults”

  1. Well Sargon … you got one thing wrong … I hate science. Not really, I love and admire science and medicine, and technology. But you see, I am also a Christian. A true believer. So by (eco-leftist) definition … I am anti-science. I believe in a sky-daddy, and I hate our environment. I think that God put animals on the planet to eat … not to love.

    Yes … everyone and everything is a simplistic cartoon in the mind of a leftist.

    2. Not only am I a Christian (Catholic), I do not believe in CAGW, I do not believe in Darwin’s theory or evolution, I do not believe in “fossil” origin of crude oil. So yes, I have been accused of being anti-science by people who don’t even have STEM degree, and having been told what degree I held. They either refuse to believe in the latter, or insist that happened so long ago it means nothing.

      OTOH, I do disagree with your last sentence. God put animals on Earth for us, yes, but not necessarily to eat. I eat some animals. But I won’t eat others. I don’t eat cats, and I love Mrs. OldBruin’s cat. (She is the official owner.) That is the least of my anti-stereotypical preferences for a conservative. I am a “person of color”, immigrant, I have an advanced degree, I went to UCLA, I live in westside of LA, I enjoy soccer, classical music, jazz, cheese, poetry (English and Chinese), Impressionist painting, Dostoevsky, Tommy Makem and the Clancey brothers, I root for the Pac and hate the SEC. Though I am not partial to car races, I’d rather watch Formula 1 than NASCAR.

      1. They either refuse to believe in the latter, or insist that happened so long ago it means nothing

        Ha! Made me laugh. I’d love to see them insist Newtonian mechanics happened so long ago, that it bears no relevance to them any longer. Our interests are remarkably aligned, however, as much as I admire and enjoy both classical music and poetry, I’ve just not dove deeply enough into them to fully appreciate them yet.

        And after not owning a pet for several years, we just “rescued” a cat from my wife’s Niece who moved from CA to a large northwestern State and could not take “Peter” with them. So Peter climbs into my lap every evening now. How does one get a cat to stop shedding? The more I comb, the more fur keeps coming. BTW … I didn’t mean not to love … but just some are tasty

        1. “How does one get a cat to stop shedding?”

          Presumably shaving is out. Have you tried varnish?
          (/sarc)

        2. Indoor or outdoor cat?
          The following is what I got from one website. It seems reasonable.
          Outdoor cats (our cat isn’t outdoor, but lives mostly in the sunroom wherein he can see and feel the changing weather) wear two coats a year, a summer coat and a winter coat. So they gradually shed their summer coat in the fall (like now) to grow the winter coat, and shed that in the spring to grow the summer coat. Indoor cats don’t do as much depending on how indoorsy the habitat is. Our cat shed horribly in the spring, but really having started in the fall yet. (Of course it only makes sense there is less of the summer fur.) Does your wife’s niece perhaps keep her house much cooler than you do?
          Admit it, you do look forward to Peter climbing into your lap.
          Perhaps I wasn’t clear. By “that” happened so long ago I mean me getting the advanced degree. They may have a point, at least from the time I retired from industry. I have been “shedding” my technical knowledge ever since.

  2. Greta of NOAA, like her 15th century counterpart, she will eventually be burned at the stake when her usefulness ends.

    2. Just saw a post on Twitter.. Says he’s gonna start a GoFundMe page for Greta’s exorcism.. I laughed out loud… Can we tell capcha to fuck off.. another 10/12 picture puzzle

    3. I sort of likened her to Judy Garland in a way, adults who should have nurtured and protected her are going to use her till they’ve squeezed all they can out of her and then will drop her like a used kleenex.

    1. You see him canoeing today sitting in the wrong position?.. Dolt.. Supposed to be the great explorer.. Can’t stand that asshole.. My BP goes nuts when I see him.

      1. The commercial should say:

        “Hi, I’m Justin Trudeau and you all bought me a new canoe and seven other boats. I occasionally use them at my vacation home, which you pay for, but most of the time I vacation in warmer places!”

  4. Thread headliner- Speaking of Leftist Cults ……
    I oftel too, fild mysenf ulcolsciousny ilterspersilg my ‘l’s and ‘n’s.
    Thalkyou.
    Slaggnepuss.
    ‘

  6. Well tomorrow is another demonstration of mass hysteria. Too bad nobody talks about that fact, instead, the idiots of the media continue their mutual admiration society for the little Maoling and their indoctrination committees, er, teachers.
    It’s a shame to see this faux outrage, none of THEM would give anything up, nor would their parents, their vacations, cars, or gas heating. Typical virtue Signalling small minds!
    Mass hysteria, nothing more!
    Oh, and make sure to never shop at MEC and Lush, amongst others. They are closing for the day, in support. There’s a list of other shops, most in Victoria are your typical hipster small coffee shops, tofu bars, and other such slop shops, serving their Lefty stoner brigades.

  7. No Sargon of Akkad. Greta should be ground into dust and if so, it wouldn’t be on OUR heads it would be upon the heads of the skeevy blackhearted swine who compose the upper echelons of Gang Green and their millions of minions who use her.
    These are the EVIL scum who have stolen $Trillions of taxes to impoverish us all and enrich themselves based entirely upon a HOAX.

    As I have said before, this Greta incident reminds me of the Iranian Ayatollahs who gave little children plastic “Keys to Heaven” and then sent them into the mine fields between Iran and Iraq just so that they could get at the “enemy” on the other side.
    Who was right, who was wrong, …doesn’t matter, those kids are dead and it wasn’t the Iraqis fault. It was the fault of those EVIL SOBs who sent them into the minefields.

    If this was WAR, and it is, Gang Green would be the ones who broke the Geneva Conventions, not the people who bombed the target knowing that the enemy was using children as human shields.

  8. So that’s where Carl Benjamin is hanging out these days:

    // Meanwhile, freelance internet archivists have been digging up recordings of some of the terrible things he’s said over the years on Youtube, like this froth-mouthed rant blaming feminism for Elliot Rodger’s misogyny-fueled murder spree.
    Kristi Apparently this screaming video rant was removed, maybe by Carl himself. Here a copy for anyone, but esp @kflogan @MikeStuchbery_ @zei_nabq
    &
    And this creepy defense of pedophilia “on a case by case basis.”
    Sargon of Akkad aka Carl Benjamin says “it depends on the child” whether they are able to consent to sex, even if they are “well under the age of 11”
    this is classic apologia for pedophilia, and it’s what got Milo’s career ruined. Somehow Sargon gets away with it //

    1. Love it! I will be using this word a lot in the coming weeks.
      When I was in my early 20’s (1971-1975), David Suzuki was banging on about Zero Population Growth and how we all should only have max. 2 children per couple. He had 3 wives and had 5 children. Clearly, he interpreted couples differently than I did. I have one daughter. Paul Erlichman was banging on that world wide famine would hit by 1980. Sadly, in Africa, the middle East and parts of India/Pakistan/Bangladash, there WAS famine and even today, there is still famine. But world-wide famine – did not happen. These two guys fear mongered in order to sell TV programs and their books. I have a more, Star Trek, positive view of the Earth’s future. I think mankind (and I do say “mankind”) will be inventive and do great things in the coming years.

      1. I have the perfect book for you. It’s All the Trouble in the World by P.J. O’Rourke (“The Lighter Side of Overpopulation, Famine, Ecological Disaster, Ethnic Hatred, Plague, and Poverty”). A bit dated now (published in 1994) but full of great bons mots:

        “Being gloomy is easier than being cheerful. Anybody can say ‘I’ve got cancer’ and get a rise out of a crowd. But how many of us can do five minutes of good stand-up comedy?
        And worrying is less work than doing something to fix the worry. This is especially true if we’re careful to pick the biggest possible problems to worry about. Everybody wants to save the earth; nobody wants to help Mom do the dishes.”

        “Fretting makes us important. Say you’re an adult male and you’re skipping down the street whistling ‘Last Train to Clarksville.’ People will call you a fool. But lean over to the person next to you on a subway and say, ‘How can you smile when innocents are dying in Tibet?’ You’ll acquire a reputation for great seriousness and also more room to sit down.”

        And regarding overpopulation:

        “Just enough of me, way too much of you.”

  11. Cut her no slack because the lip curling little darling is being used as an idiot tool of the socialists.
    Fridays are reserved for teaching little Marxist narcissists Civil Disobedience 101.
    They graduate on to become goons of the thought police at institutions of advanced indoctrination in intersectionality.
    They are rabid. No Dear Leader’s whistle will get these little monsters to heel once they embark on a culture cleansing.

  12. Well, the Gores and the Suzukis were a little long in the tooth and wouldn’t resonate with the latest generation of idiots. The MSM and the green parasites needed a new Screecher for their flock of fools.

  13. Ignorant, indoctrinated climate brats, Greta and every other teenaged twerp cutting school to “strike”. If those kids are our future, then the Earth might as well burn because none of them deserve a future.

  14. This child has a bleak future. Not because of climate but because of her parents and the people manipulating her.

  15. So uh…ain’t today the meeting of the Climate Emergency (screech) “minds” in Ottawa..??

    The Swedish retard will meet with our own homegrown retard…and be glowingly reported / fawned upon by the various Retarded Canadian Media …. With the obligatory mention that if you happen to deny Man Made Climate change, you are of course the progenitor – first ever Neanderthal NAZI + a current White Supremist, Racist, Euro-Centric POS…

    Yea, I thought so.

  16. The most revealing part of this sane vid is from 7:00 – 8:30
    She is a child, and she is nothing more than a memorized speech.
    The other part starts at 9:50 – 11:30
    Which shows the U.N. has pulled this bs before(1992).
    The left has no qualms about using children.

  17. Why doesn’t the media ask where the money and organizing power is coming from. Clearly it’s beyond the ability of the little Swedish freak. Who’s behind this.

    1. The media consistently fails to ask the following set of background questions of any climate change celebrity:

      1. How many residences do you have?
      2. How many vehicles do you own?
      3. How many boats do you own?
      4. Do you own a private plane?
      5. How often do you fly and what class do you fly in?

  18. I have some symapthy for her and how she’s been used, but her parents have, by pimping her out thusly, tacitly given all of us permission to ignore her age. They put her out on the world stage, innocently or not, and it will destroy her, innocently or not. They turned a teen who needs psychiatric help into a target, and we treat her as anything but a target at our own peril. Keep in mind, at 16, she’s not a “real” child, so don’t let people try to use that term as a deflection. If a child soldier is under 16, and she’s not, she should be treated as an “enemy combatant”.

    It kind of reminds me of that scene in American Sniper where the mom gives the grenade to her kid in the street to attack the convoy: she made her child into a valid military target and, quite frankly, deserved to watch him die for doing it. The fact that she was willing to send her kid out instead of doing it herself (probably would have been more successful, too) shows her to be a monster. I have about the same amount of sympathy for Greta’s parents: they’re brain-damaged monsters using a teenager for fun and profit.

    1. calgary:
      is that scene also based on an actual experience by the sniper?
      hollyweird and all that . . . . .
      my view? other than the ‘view’ thru the scope?
      gently squeeze . . . . .
      mebbe even aim for the bulge in the cloak and pop the grenade for effect.
      and remember, the kid KNEW FULL WELL about the martyr angle.

      1. There’s a lot of criticism of both the autobiography and the Hollywood version of it, so who knows? And most of it came up after Kyle was no longer around to defend himself. The only bit that I understand to be truly fabricated was the long-distance duel with the opposing sniper–for dramatic effect.

        However, upon searching for the info, I found this, so TIL:

        Did Chris Kyle really shoot a boy who was concealing a grenade?

        No. In the movie, Chris Kyle (Bradley Cooper) shoots a boy and his mother who are approaching a U.S. Marine convoy concealing an RKG-3 Russian Anti-Tank Grenade. In the book, a woman does come out of a small house with her child, but she approaches the convoy by herself as she conceals something beneath her clothes. She sets a Chinese grenade, not a Russian RKG. Kyle hesitates shooting the woman but does take the shot. The grenade drops and he fires again as it’s exploding. It was “the only time I killed anyone other than a male combatant,” writes Kyle. In the book, he indicates that this is his first kill in Iraq.

        In his autobiography, Chris Kyle does scope a child at one point. The moment is also depicted in the movie. The combatants had sent the child down the street to retrieve an RPG (in the movie, a nearby boy simply wanders over and picks up the RPG). “I had a clear view in my scope,” writes Kyle, “but I didn’t fire. I wasn’t going to kill a kid, innocent or not. I’d have to wait until the savage who put him up to it showed himself on the street.”

        Source: History vs Hollywood website, found in a search

        That said, I still have no sympathy for anyone who uses their kids politically or militarily. Defending against them is also not the same as preemptively attacking someone’s kids/family.

        Mods, if this turns out to be the 2nd/3rd post, please delete the ones not containing the proper URL. Thanks.

    2. hb, I’m having mucho problems posting my reply to you, so I’m trying again:

      There’s a lot of criticism of both the autobiography and the Hollywood version of it, so who knows? And most of it came up after Kyle was no longer around to defend himself. The only bit that I understand to be truly fabricated was the long-distance duel with the opposing sniper–for dramatic effect.

      However, upon searching for the info, I found this on History vs Hollywood, so TIL:

      Did Chris Kyle really shoot a boy who was concealing a grenade?

      No. In the movie, Chris Kyle (Bradley Cooper) shoots a boy and his mother who are approaching a U.S. Marine convoy concealing an RKG-3 Russian Anti-Tank Grenade. In the book, a woman does come out of a small house with her child, but she approaches the convoy by herself as she conceals something beneath her clothes. She sets a Chinese grenade, not a Russian RKG. Kyle hesitates shooting the woman but does take the shot. The grenade drops and he fires again as it’s exploding. It was “the only time I killed anyone other than a male combatant,” writes Kyle. In the book, he indicates that this is his first kill in Iraq.

      In his autobiography, Chris Kyle does scope a child at one point. The moment is also depicted in the movie. The combatants had sent the child down the street to retrieve an RPG (in the movie, a nearby boy simply wanders over and picks up the RPG). “I had a clear view in my scope,” writes Kyle, “but I didn’t fire. I wasn’t going to kill a kid, innocent or not. I’d have to wait until the savage who put him up to it showed himself on the street.”

      That said, I still have no sympathy for anyone who uses their kids politically or militarily. Defending against them is also not the same as preemptively attacking someone’s kids/family.

  19. I don’t think “Saint Greta” adequately describes what she thinks of herself. Even if we all know she is just mouthing the speeches, she must still believe in them.
    Found this quote on climatedepot of her at the U.N. She excoriated the national leaders for inaction, culminating with:
    “Yet you all come to me for hope? How dare you,” she said.

  20. nuthin ta wurrry bout saint greta?
    ooooooh no no no no. LOTS to worry about that one.
    I have on good aut’orty there is an underground movement (kinda like a bowel movement) to start a brannnnn new riligin
    based on greta the saint.
    watch for followers at the airport and empty edifices like the scientologists.

    you saw it here first at SDA.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation